Abstract
This case study discusses the Survivor-Centered Advocacy (SCA) Project, a community-based participatory research (CBPR) project that convened anti-violence advocates from culturally specific communities to design and implement research. The project used a unique approach to build grassroots research capacity and center survivors of intimate partner violence from historically marginalized communities. This approach coalesced into the creation of an exploratory Community-Led Research (CLR) framework that incorporated trauma-informed, research justice and language justice principles. The CLR framework responded to community members’ desire to lead, rather than simply participate in, the research process. As a result, five studies were designed and executed by practitioners turned community-based researchers, most of whom had never before engaged in research, except as subjects. The CLR framework integrated the skills and experiences of community-based and external researchers, and led to high levels of engagement, rich data, more equitable research processes and innovative research projects.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Full details about the SCA Project can be found in the final report that will be posted to the following website by Spring 2019: www.api-gbv.org. The SCA Project team and participants included: Aracelia Aguilar, Maria Carrillo, Harmit Cheema, Juana Flores, Susan Ghanbarpour, Irene Girgis, Amber Hodson, Tara Holcomb, Maria Jimenez, Mallika Kaur, Mimi Kim, Lesli Irene LeGras, Beckie Masaki, Carolina Morales, Kao “Tang” Ying Moua, Nuri Nusrat, Ada Palotai, Orchid Pusey, Riffat J. Rahman, Alvina Rosales, Wendy Schlater, Hyejin Shim and Liz Suk.
References
Allen, N. E., Bybee, D. I., & Sullivan, C. M. (2004). Battered women’s multitude of needs: Evidence supporting the need for comprehensive advocacy. Violence Against Women, 10(9), 1015–1035. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801204267658.
Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., Koh, C., Ng, K. Y., Templer, K. J., Tay, C., & Chandresekar, N. A. (2007). Cultural intelligence: Its measurement and effects on cultural judgment and decision making, cultural adaptation and task performance. Management and Organization Review, 3(3), 335–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2007.00082x.
Antena (2013). How to build language justice. Retrieved from http://antenaantena.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/langjust_eng.pdf
Assil, R., Kim, M., & Waheed, S. (2015). An Introduction to Research Justice. Retrieved from http://solidarityresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/RJ101_FINAL_WEB.pdf
Batterbury, S. C. E. (2014). Democratising policy theories: Enhancing prospects for language justice for sign language peoples. Polity & Politics, 42(4), 547–564. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557312X655701.
Bloom, T., Wagman, J., Hernandez, R., Yragui, N., Hernandez-Valdovinos, N., Dahlstrom, M., & Glass, N. (2009). Partnering with community-based organizations to reduce intimate partner violence. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 31(2), 244–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986309333291.
Cattaneo, L. B., & Goodman, L. A. (2015). What is empowerment anyway? A model for domestic violence practice, research, and evaluation. Psychology of Violence, 5(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035137.
Center for Survivor Agency & Justice. (2017). Survivor-centered advocacy. Retrieved from https://csaj.org/survivor-centered-advocacy
Earley, P. C., & Mosakowski, E. (2004). Cultural intelligence. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 139–146.
Edleson, J. L., & Bible, A. B. (1998). Forced bonding or community collaboration? Partnerships between science and practice in research on woman battering. In National Institute of Justice, viewing crime and justice from a collaborative perspective: Plenary papers of the 1998 conference on criminal justice research and evaluation (pp. 25–28). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
Edleson, J. L., & Bible, A. B. (2001). Collaborating for women’s safety: Partnerships between research and practice. In C. Renzetti, J. Edleson, & R. Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (pp. 73–95). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Garzón, C., Beveridge, B., Gordon, M., Martin, C., Matalon, E., & Moore, E. (2013). Power, privilege, and the process of community-based participatory research: Critical reflections on forging an empowered partnership for environmental justice in West Oakland, California. Environmental Justice, 6(2), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2012.0039.
Ginther, D. K., Schaffer, W. T., Schnell, J., Masimore, B., Liu, F., Haak, L. L., & Kington, R. (2011). Race, ethnicity, and NIH research awards. Science, 333(6045), 1015–1019. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1196783.
Glass, N. (2009). Partnering with community-based organizations to reduce intimate partner violence. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 31(2), 244–257.
Goodman, L. A., & Epstein, D. (2008). Psychology of women. Listening to battered women: A survivor-centered approach to advocacy, mental health, and justice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11651-000.
Goodman, L.A., Thomas, K.A., Serrata, J.V., Lippy, C., Nnawulezi, N., Ghanbarpour, S., Macy, R., Sullivan, C. & Bair-Merritt, M.A. (2017). Power through partnerships: A CBPR toolkit for domestic violence researchers. Retrieved from https://cbprtoolkit.org/
Green, L. W., George, M. A., Daniel, M., Frankish, C. J., Herbert, C. P., Bowie, W. R., & O'Neill, M. (1995). Study of participatory research in health promotion: Review and recommendations for the development of participatory research in health promotion in Canada. Vancouver, British Columbia: Royal Society of Canada.
Hayden, E. C. (2015). Racial bias continues to haunt NIH grants: Minorities still less likely to win biomedical funding. Nature News, 527(7578), 286–287. https://doi.org/10.1038/527286a.
Israel, B. A., Eng, E., Schulz, A. J., & Parker, E. A. (2005). Methods in community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Judicial Council of California. (2015). What is Language Access. Retrieved from http://www.courts.ca.gov/24467.htm.
Kirmayer, L. J., Gone, J. P., & Moses, J. (2014). Rethinking historical trauma. Transcultural Psychiatry, 5(13), 299–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461514536358.
Koyama, E. (2006). Disloyal to feminism: Abuse of survivors within the domestic violence shelter system. In INCITE! Women of Color Against Violence (Eds.), Color of violence: The INCITE! Anthology (pp. 208–222). Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
McKee, M., Thew, D., Starr, M., Kushalnagar, P., Reid, J. T., Graybill, P., Velasquez, J., & Pearson, T. (2012). Engaging the deaf american sign language community: Lessons from a community-based participatory research center. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 6(3), 321–329. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2012.0037.
Mehrotra, G., Kimball, E., & Wahab, S. (2016). The braid that binds us: The impact of neoliberalism, criminalization, and professionalization on domestic violence work. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 31, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109916643871.
Minkler, M. (2005). Community-based research partnerships: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 82(2), ii3–ii12. https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/jti034.
Minkler, M. (2012). Community organizing and community building for health and welfare. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Mouradian, V. E., Mechanic, M., & Williams, L. M. (2001). Recommendations for establishing and maintaining successful researcher-practitioner collaborations. Wellesley, MA: National Violence Against Women Research Center, Wellesley College.
Murray, C. E., & Smith, P. H. (2009). Perceptions of research and practice among domestic violence researchers. Journal of Aggression, Conflict, and Peace Research, 1, 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/17596599200900014.
Reisch, M., & Garvin, C. D. (2016). Social work and social justice: Concepts, challenge, and strategies. NY: Oxford University Press.
Satterfield, J. M., Spring, B., Brownson, R. C., Mullen, E. J., Newhouse, R. P., Walker, B. B., & Whitlock, E. P. (2009). Toward a transdisciplinary model of evidence-based practice. The Milbank Quarterly, 87(2), 368–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00561.x.
Serrata, J. V., Macias, R. L., Rosales, A., Hernandez, M., & Perilla, J. L. (2017). Expanding evidence-based practice models for domestic violence initiatives: A community-centered approach. Psychology of Violence, 7(1), 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000051.
Sheikh, A. (2006). Why are ethnic minorities under-represented in US research studies? PLoS Medicine, 3(2), e49. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030049.
Slattery, S. M., & Goodman, L. A. (2009). Secondary traumatic stress among domestic violence advocates: Workplace risk and protective factors. Violence Against Women, 15(11), 1358–1379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801209347469.
Sokoloff, N. J., & Dupont, I. (2005). Domestic violence at the intersections of race, class, and gender: Challenges and contributions to understanding violence against marginalized women in diverse communities. Violence Against Women, 11(1), 38–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801204271476.
Sullivan, M., Bhuyan, R., Senturia, K., Shui-Thornton, S., & Ciske, S. (2005). Participatory action research in practice: A case study in addressing domestic violence in nine cultural communities. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(8), 977–995. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260505277680.
Sullivan, T.P., Price, C., McPartland, T., Hunter, B.A., & Fisher, B.S. (2017). The Researcher-Practitioner Partnership Study (RPPS): Experiences from criminal justice system collaborations studying violence against women. Violence Against Women, 23(7), 887–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216650290.
Tervalon, M., & Murray-Garcia, J. (1998). Cultural humility versus cultural competence: A critical distinction in defining physician training outcomes in multicultural education. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Undeserved, 9, 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2010.0233.
World Health Organization. (2001). Putting women first: Ethical and safety recommendations for research on domestic violence. Geneva, Switzerland: Garcia-Moreno, C.
Yuan, N. P., Gaines, T. L., Jones, L. M., Rodrigues, L. M., & Hamilton, N. (2016). Bridging the gap between research and practice by strengthening academic-community partnerships for violence research. Psychology of Violence, 6(1), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000026.
Acknowledgements
The SCA Project was supported by Grant Number 90EV0430 from the Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Family and Youth Services Bureau, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; the Blue Shield of California Foundation; and the NoVo Foundation. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of any of the abovementioned entities. We are grateful to and acknowledge the contributions of Trilce Santana and Florencia Manovil – Spanish-English interpreters and translators and members of a Bay Area language justice collective – who worked with us extensively throughout the SCA project, and who first introduced us to the term and concept of “language justice.” Lastly, a special thank you to API-GBV staff member, Biney Kaur Dev, who contributed much to the preparation of this manuscript and to the SCA Project overall.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Susan Ghanbarpour was formerly at the Asian Pacific Institute on Gender-Based Violence.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ghanbarpour, S., Palotai, A., Kim, M.E. et al. An Exploratory Framework for Community-Led Research to Address Intimate Partner Violence: a Case Study of the Survivor-Centered Advocacy Project. J Fam Viol 33, 521–535 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-018-9987-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-018-9987-y