Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Family Court Survivor-Centered Practice: A Qualitative Study of Advocate-IPV Survivor Safety Planning Interactions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In supporting survivors of intimate partner violence navigate the criminal justice system, many agencies offer legal and/or court programs guided by an empowerment-based, survivor-centered approach. However, there is limited research examining survivor-centered practice in the context of court services. The goal of this study was to explore the specific skills and strategies used by one sample of family court advocates to conduct survivor-centered safety planning with survivors. Twenty-two recorded family court advocate-survivor sessions were qualitatively explored and survivor-centered strategies for safety planning were identified. Such strategies included open-ended exploration of risks and safety options, paraphrasing survivor-identified risks and safety plans, prioritizing immediate risks, understanding safety strategies and resources, exploring support systems, providing survivor-centered information, and discussing the pros and cons of safety options. Understanding specific skills and strategies that may be utilized by family court advocates can support the field in developing, implementing, training on, supervising, and evaluating survivor-centered approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell, M. E. (2007). Empowerment and disempowerment for victims of intimate partner violence: An overview of the effects of criminal justice system practices. In K. Kendall-Tackett & S. M. Giacomoni (Eds.), Intimate partner violence (pp. 1–23). Kingston: Civic Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. E., & Goodman, L. A. (2001). Supporting battered women involved with the court system: An evaluation of a law school-based advocacy intervention. Violence Against Women, 7, 1377–1404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. E., Perez, S., Goodman, L. A., & Dutton, M. A. (2011). Perceptions of civil and criminal court helpfulness: The role of court outcome and process. Violence Against Women, 17(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801210393924.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett Cattaneo, L., & Goodman, L. A. (2005). Risk factors for reabuse in intimate partner violence: A cross-disciplinary critical review. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 6, 141–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838005275088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiding, M. J., Chen, J., & Black, M. C. (2014). Intimate partner violence in the United States — 2010. Atlanta: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J., & Glass, N. (2009). Safety planning, danger, and lethality assessment. In C. Mitchell & D. Anglin (Eds.), Intimate partner violence: A health-based perspective (pp. 319–334). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattaneo, L. B., & Goodman, L. A. (2010). Empowerment in the court system and well-being for intimate partner violence victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(3), 481–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509334282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J., & Lyon, E. (2014). Domestic violence advocacy: Complex lives/difficult choices. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DeVoe, E. R., & Smith, E. L. (2003). Don't take my kids: Barriers to service delivery for battered mothers and their young children. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 3(3–4), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1300/J135v03n03_06.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleury-Steiner, R. E., Bybee, D. I., Sullivan, C. M., Belknap, J., & Melton, H. C. (2006). Contextual factors impacting battered women’s intentions to reuse the criminal legal system. Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillis, J. R., Diamond, S. L., Jebely, P., Orekhovsky, V., Ostovich, E. M., MacIsaac, K., Sagrati, S., & Mandell, D. (2006). Systemic obstacles to battered women’s participation in the judicial system: When will the status quo change? Violence Against Women, 12, 1150–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206293500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L., & Epstein, D. (2008). Listening to battered women: A survivor-centered approach to advocacy, mental health, and justice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A., Thomas, K., Bennett Cattaneo, L., Heimel, D., Woulfe, J., & Chong, S. K. (2014). Practice in domestic violence work: Measure development and preliminary evidence of link to empowerment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31, 163–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514555131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann, J., Shor, R., Schaefer, K., & Bennett Cattaneo, L. (2018). Development of a tool to assess client-centered practice on a domestic violence hotline. Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017318757395.

  • Hardesty, J. L., & Campbell, J. C. (2004). Safety planning for abused women and their children. In P. G. Jaffe, L. L. Baker, & A. J. Cunningham (Eds.), Protecting children from domestic violence: Strategies for community intervention. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, V. E., Protivnak, J. J., & Sadlak, L. (2008). Counseling clients involved with violent intimate partners: The mental health counselor’s role in promoting client safety. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 30(3), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.30.3.e0r87734721l6016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (2000). Evolution of a model of stress, coping, and discrete emotions. In V. H. Rice (Ed.), Handbook of stress, coping, and health: Implications for nursing research, theory, and practice (pp. 195–222). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, F., Ross, T., & Guthrie, P. (2008). Enhancing safety and justice for victims of domesticviolence: Voices of women in the Queens integrated domestic violence court. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lindhorst, T., Nurius, P., & Macy, R. J. (2005). Contextualized assessment with battered women: Strategic safety planning to cope with multiple harms. Journal of Social Work Education, 41(2), 331–352.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, T. K., & Walker, R. (2009). Civil protective order outcomes: Violations and perceptions of effectiveness. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(4), 675–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508317186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, T. K., & Walker, R. (2010). Civil protective order effectiveness: Justice or just a piece of paper? Violence and Victims, 25(3), 332–348. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.25.3.332.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, T. K., & Walker, R. (2018). Looking into the day-to-day process of victim safety planning. Journal of Family Violence, 33, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-018-9951-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macy, R. J., Giattina, M., Sangster, T. H., Crosby, C., & Montijo, N. J. (2009). Domestic violence and sexual assault services: Inside the blackbox. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14, 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.06.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melbin, A. (2010). Voluntary services model. Washington, DC: The Office on Violence Against Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Revised and expanded from “case study research in education”. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C. E., & Graves, K. N. (2012). Responding to family violence: A comprehensive, research-based guide for therapists. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C., Horton, E., Johnson, G. H., Notestine, C., Garr, L., Pow, B. M., Flasch, A. P., & Doom, E. (2015). Domestic violence service providers’ perceptions of safety planning: A focus group study. Journal of Family Violence, 30, 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-015-9674-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, A. J. (2013). Survivor-defined practices to mitigate revictimization of battered women in the protective order process. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(7), 1403–1423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512468243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nurius, P. S. (2000). Coping. In P. Allen-Meares & C. Garvin (Eds.), Handbook of social work direct practice (pp. 349–372). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Römkens, R. (2006). Protecting prosecution: Exploring the powers of law in an intervention program for domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 12, 160–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801205284922.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (2012). Effectiveness, victim safety, characteristics, and enforcement of protective orders. Partner Abuse, 3(4), 531–552. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.3.4.531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steen, J. A. (2009). The perceived impact of a child maltreatment report from the perspective of the domestic violence shelter worker. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(11), 1906–1918. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508325495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, C. M., & Bybee, D. I. (1999). Reducing violence using community-based advocacy for women with abusive partners. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(1), 43–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tirado-Muñoz, J., Gilchrist, G., Farré, M., Hegarty, K., & Torrens, M. (2014). The efficacy of cognitive behavioural therapy and advocacy interventions for women who have experienced intimate partner violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Medicine, 46(8), 567–586. https://doi.org/10.3109/07853890.2014.941918.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waugh, F., & Bonner, M. (2002). Domestic violence and child protection: Issues in safety planning. Child Abuse Review, 11, 282–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author expresses her gratitude to Maureen Curtis, Vice President of Criminal Justice and Court Programs at Safe Horizon, and her staff for their continued support of this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda M. Stylianou.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stylianou, A.M. Family Court Survivor-Centered Practice: A Qualitative Study of Advocate-IPV Survivor Safety Planning Interactions. J Fam Viol 34, 245–259 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-018-0020-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-018-0020-2

Keywords

Navigation