Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 3–12 | Cite as

Risk Factors for Women’s Intimate Partner Violence Victimization: An Examination from the Perspective of the Schema Therapy Model

Original Article


This study attempted to examine risk factors for intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization against women in terms of the schema therapy model (STM). Seventy-nine shelter-residing female IPV victims and 78 married female IPV non-victims participated in the study. The Young Schema Questionnaire Short Form, the Young Parenting Inventory, the Young Compensation Inventory, and the Young Avoidance Inventory were used. The results revealed that being young and having low income were risk factors for IPV victimization. Paternal parenting style was also found to be a further risk factor in addition to demographic variables. Further, the endorsement of disconnection and the unrelenting standards schema domains presented further information predicting IPV victimization above and beyond demographic variables and parenting styles. Maladaptive coping styles did not reveal themselves as maintenance factors for IPV victimization when the information gathered from demographic variables, parenting styles, and schema domains is taken out. The results are discussed in terms of the STM.


Early maladaptive schemas Parenting styles Coping styles Shelters 



Findings reported here are derived from the Master’s thesis of the first author under the supervision of the second author. The study was conducted with the permission of Hacettepe University Ethics Committee and the Family and Social Policies Ministry of Turkey. The authors want to thank Assoc. Prof. Özlem Sertel-Berk for her invaluable contribution during the data analysis process.


  1. Alhabib, S., Nur, U., & Jones, R. (2010). Domestic violence against women: Systematic review of prevalence studies. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 369–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Astin, M. C., Ogland-Hand, S. M., Coleman, E. M., & Foy, D. W. (1995). Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and childhood abuse in battered women: Comparisons with martially distressed women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(2), 308–312.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Blissett, J., & Haycraft, E. (2008). Are parenting style and controlling feeding practices related? Appetite, 50, 477–485.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Browne, A. (1993). Violence against women by male partners: Prevalence, outcomes and policy implications. American Psychologist, 48(10), 1077–1087.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Caetano, R., Vaeth, P. A. C., & Ramisetty-Mikler, S. (2008). Intimate partner violence victim and perpetrator characteristics among couples in United States. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 507–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Çakır, Z. (2007). Antisosyal kişilik bozukluğunda erken dönem uyumsuz şemalar, algılanan ebeveynlik stilleri ve şema sürdürücü başa çıkma davranışları arasındaki ilişkiler: şema terapi modeli çerçevesinde bir inceleme [Relationship between early maladaptive schemas, perceived parenting styles and schema perpetuating coping styles in antisocial personality disorder: An assessment in terms of schema therapy model]. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Hacettepe University Graduate School of Social Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.Google Scholar
  7. Calvete, E., & Orue, I. (2013). Cognitive mechanisms of the transmission of violence: Exploring gender differences among adolescents exposed to family violence. Journal of Family Violence, 28, 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calvete, E., Corral, S., & Estévez, A. (2007a). Cognitive and coping mechanisms in the interplay between intimate partner violence and depression. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 20(4), 369–382.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Calvete, E., Estévez, A., & Corral, S. (2007b). Intimate partner violence and depressive symptoms in women: Cognitive schemas as moderators and mediators. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 791–804.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cascardi, M., O’Leary, K. D., Lawrence, E. E., & Schlee, K. (1995). Characteristics of women physically abused by their spouses and who seek treatment regarding marital conflict. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(4), 616–623.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Crawford, E., & O’Dougherty Wright, M. (2007). The impact of childhood psychological maltreatment on interpersonal schemas and subsequent experiences of relationship aggression. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 7(2), 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cukor, D., & McGinn, L. K. (2006). History of child abuse and severity of adult depression: The mediating role of cognitive schemata. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 15(3), 19–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dağ, İ. (1991). Belirti Tarama Listesi (SCL-90-R)‘nin üniversite öğrencileri için güvenirliği ve geçerliliği [Reliability and validity of the Symptom Checklist (SCL-90-R) for university students]. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 2(1), 5–12.Google Scholar
  14. Dahlberg, L. L., & Krug, E. G. (2002). Violence – a global public health problem. In E. G. Krug, L. L. Dahlberg, J. A. Mercy, A. B. Zwi, & R. Lozano (Eds.), World report on violence and health (pp. 1–21). Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  15. Downs, W. R., Miller, B. A., Testa, M., & Panek, D. (1992). Long-term effects of parent-to-child violence for women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 365–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dutton, M. A., Burghardt, K. J., Perrin, S. G., Chrestman, K. R., & Halle, P. M. (1994). Battered women’s cognitive schemata. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 7(2), 237–255.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellsberg, M., Peña, R., Herrera, A., Liljestrand, J., & Winkvist, A. (2000). Candies in hell: Women’s experiences of violence in Nicaragua. Social Science and Medicine, 51(11), 1595–1610.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Farrell, G. (1992). Multiple victimization: Its extent and significance. International Review of Victimology, 2, 85–102.Google Scholar
  19. Flynn, A., & Graham, K. (2010). “Why did it happen?” A review and conceptual framework for research on perpetrators’ and victims’ explanations for intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 239–251.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Garcia-Moreno, C., Jansen, H. A. F. M., Ellsberg, M., Heise, L., & Watts, C. H. (2006). Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. The Lancet, 368(3543), 1260–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gay, L. E., Harding, H. G., Jackson, J. L., Burns, E. E., & Baker, B. D. (2013). Attachment style and early maladaptive schemas as mediators of the relationship between childhood emotional abuse and intimate partner violence. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 22, 408–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Güleç Öyekçin, D., Yetim, D., & Şahin, E. M. (2012). Kadına yönelik farklı eş şiddeti tiplerini etkileyen psikososyal faktörler [Psychosocial factors affecting different types of violence against women]. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 23(2), 75–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Haycraft, E. L., & Blissett, J. M. (2008). Maternal and paternal controlling feeding practices: Reliability and relationships with BMI. Obesity, 16, 1552–1558.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hubbs-Tait, L., Kennedy, T. S., Page, M. C., Topham, G. L., & Harrist, A. W. (2008). Parental feeding practices predict authoritative, authoritarian, and permissive parenting styles. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 108(7), 1154–1161.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hyde-Nolan, M. E., & Juliano, T. (2012). Theoretical basis for family violence. In R. Fife and S. Schrager (Eds.), Family violence: What healthcare providers need to know (s. 5–21). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.Google Scholar
  26. Jacobson, N. S., Gottman, J. W., Waltz, J., Rushe, R., et al. (1994). Affect, verbal content, and psychophysiology in the arguments of couples with a violent husband. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(5), 982–988.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Jansen, H. A. F. M., Yüksel, İ., & Çağatay, P. (2009). Kadına yönelik şiddetin yaygınlığı [Prevalence of violence against women]. T.C. Başbakanlık Kadının Statüsü Genel Müdürlüğü. In Türkiye’de kadına yönelik aile içi şiddet [Violence against women in Turkey] (pp. 45–70). Ankara: T.C. Başbakanlık Kadının Statüsü Genel Müdürlüğü.Google Scholar
  28. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1996). The autonomous-relational self: A new synthesis. European Psychologist, 1(3), 180–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Karaosmanoğlu, A., Soygüt, G., & Kabul, A. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Turkish Young Compensation Inventory. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 20(2), 171–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lloyd, S., Farrell, G., & Pease, K. (1994). Preventing repeated domestic violence: A demonstration project on Merseyside. London: Home Office Police Department.Google Scholar
  31. Maker, A. H., Kemmelmeier, M., & Peterson, C. (1998). Long-term psychological consequences in women of witnessing parental physical conflict and experiencing abuse in childhood. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13(5), 574–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mihalic, S. W., & Elliott, D. (1997a). A social learning theory model of marital violence. Journal of Family Violence, 12(1), 21–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mihalic, S. W., & Elliott, D. (1997b). If violence is domestic, does it really count? Journal of Family Violence, 12(3), 293–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Naçar, M., Baykan, Z., Poyrazoğlu, S., & Çetinkaya, F. (2009). Kayseri ilinde iki sağlık ocağı bölgesinde kadına yönelik aile içi şiddet [Violence against women in two health center in the Kayseri province]. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin, 8(2), 131–138.Google Scholar
  36. O’Neill, M. L., & Kerig, P. K. (2000). Attributions of self-blame and perceived control as moderators of adjustment in battered women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 1036–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Phares, V., & Compas, B. E. (1992). The role of fathers in child and adolescent psychopathology: Make room for daddy. Psychological Bulletin, 111(3), 387–412.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Renner, L. M., & Shook Slack, K. (2006). Intimate partner violence and child maltreatment: Understanding intra- and intergenerational connections. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30(6), 599–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Şahin, B. (2011). Alkol bağımlıları ve eşlerinde evlilik uyumu, bağlanma biçimi ve mizaç karakter özellikleri arasındaki ilişki [Relationship between marital adjustment, attachment type and temperament characteristics of alcoholics and their spouses]. Unpublished Specialty in Medicine Thesis. Ankara, Turkey: Gazi University Faculty of Medicine Psychiatry Department.Google Scholar
  41. Schornstein, S. L. (1997). The dynamics of abuse. In Domestic violence and health care: What every professional needs to know (pp. 46–69). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  42. Soygüt, G. (2007). Young-Rygh kaçınma ölçeği (YR-KÖ)‘nin psikometrik özellikleri [Psychometric properties of Young-Rygh Avoidance Inventory (YR-AI)]. Unpublished instrument .Retrieved from:
  43. Soygüt, G. (2012). Parental styles: Universalities and cultural specificities [special issue]. International Journal of Psychology, 47, 237–238.Google Scholar
  44. Soygüt, G., & Karaosmanoğlu, A. (2005). The Relationship between parenting style and interpersonal schemas. Presented at the meeting of European Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies. Greece: Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
  45. Soygüt, G., Çakır, Z., & Karaosmanoğlu, A. (2008). Ebeveynlik biçimlerinin değerlendirilmesi: Young Ebeveynlik Ölçeği’nin psikometrik özelliklerine ilişkin bir inceleme [Assessment of parenting styles: A psychometric study of the Turkish Young Parenting Inventory]. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 11(22), 17–30.Google Scholar
  46. Soygüt, G., Karaosmanoğlu, A., & Çakır, Z. (2009). Erken dönem uyumsuz şemaların değerlendirilmesi: Young Şema Ölçeği Kısa Form–3'ün psikometrik özelliklerine ilişkin bir inceleme [Assessment of early maladaptive schemas: A psychometric study of the Turkish Young Schema Questionnaire–Short Form–3]. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 20(1), 75–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Stith, S. M., Smith, D. B., Penn, C. E., Ward, D. B., & Tritt, D. (2004). Intimate partner physical abuse perpetration and victimization risk factors: a meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 65–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Swartout, K. M., Cook, S. L., & White, J. W. (2012). Trajectories of intimate partner violence victimization. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 13(3), 272–277.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Taşkale, N. (2014). Aile içi şiddet mağduru kadınların Şema Terapi Modeli açısından incelenmesi [Analysis of domestic violence victim women in terms of Schema Focused Model]. Hacettepe University Graduate School of Social Sciences, Ankara, Turkey: Unpublished Master’s Thesis.Google Scholar
  50. Taşkale, N., & Soygüt, G. (2015). Sığınaklarda kalan şiddet mağduru kadınlar: Demografik ve sosyoekonomik bir inceleme [Shelter-residing female violence victims: A demographic and socioeconomic examination]. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  51. Walker, L. E. (2009). Learned helplessness, learned optimism and battered women. In The battered woman syndrome. 3rd ed. NY: Springer Publication Cooperation.Google Scholar
  52. Watts, C., & Zimmerman, C. (2002). Violence against women: global scope and magnitude. The Lancet, 359(9313), 1232–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. White, J. W., Smith, P. H. (2004). Longitudinal perspective on physical and sexual intimate partner violence against women. In B. Fisher (Ed.), Violence Against Women and Family Violence: Developments in Research, Practice, and Policy (pp. II/2/1–II/2/10). Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
  54. Yıldırım, A. (1996). Sığınaklarda kalan kadınların uğradığı şiddetin boyutları, The dimensions of violence experienced by shelter-residing women. Ankara, Turkey: Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Hacettepe University Graduate School of Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  55. Young, J. E. (1994). Young parenting inventory. New York: Cognitive Therapy Center of New York.Google Scholar
  56. Young, J. E. (1995). Young compensation inventory. New York: Cognitive Therapy Center of New York.Google Scholar
  57. Young, J. E. (1998). Young schema inventory – short form. New York: Cognitive Therapy Center of New York.Google Scholar
  58. Young, J. E., & Brown, G. (1990). Young schema questionnaire. New York: Cognitive Therapy Center of New York.Google Scholar
  59. Young, J. E., & Rygh, J. (1994). Young-Rygh avoidance inventory. New York: Cognitive Therapy Center of New York.Google Scholar
  60. Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S., & Weishaar, M. E. (2003). Schema therapy: A practitioner’s guide. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyHacettepe UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyIstanbul UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations