Skip to main content


Log in

Assessing Children’s Risk for Homicide in the Context of Domestic Violence

  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript


Increasing evidence indicates that children are at risk of homicide in the context of domestic violence. Using a retrospective case analysis of 84 domestic homicide cases, this study sought to identify the unique factors that place a child at risk of homicide. Three groups of domestic homicide cases in which there were no children in the home (No Child in the Home, n = 44), a child was targeted (Child Target, n = 13), and a child was present, but not targeted (No Child Target, n = 27) were compared. Overall, there were no significant differences amongst cases involving children (targeted or not) on major factors except for the higher number of agencies involved with couples with children. Few cases had risk assessment or safety plans completed. Despite the study limitations, the findings speak to the need for professionals to assess child risk and include children in safety planning in all cases of domestic violence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others


  • Adams, D. (2007). Why do they kill? Men who murder their intimate partners. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alpert, E. J., Cohen, S., & Sege, R. D. (1997). Family violence: an overview. Academic Medicine, 72(1), S3–S6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bourget, D., Grace, J., & Whitehurst, L. (2007). A review of maternal and paternal filicide. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 35(1), 74–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, M. (2009). Child fatality or serious injury through maltreatment: making sense of outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 1107–1112. doi:10.1016/j.child youth.2009.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. C. (1995). Assessing dangerousness violence by sexual offenders, batterers, and child abusers. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. C., Webster, D., Koziol-McLain, J., Block, C., Campbell, D., Curry, M. A., et al. (2003). Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: results from a multisite case control study. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1089–1097. doi:10.2105/AJPH.93.7.1089.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1996). Violence against stepchildren. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5(3), 77–81. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Division of Criminal Justice Services Office of Justice Research and Performance. (2008). Criminal justice research report: Domestic homicide in New York State, 2007. Albany: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domestic Violence Advisory Council (2009). Transforming our communities: Report from the Domestic Violence Advisory Council for Minister Responsible for Women’s Issues. Toronto, ON: Ontario Women’s Directorate. Retrieved from

  • Ewing, C. P. (1997). Fatal families: The dynamics of intrafamilial homicide. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, J. (2010). Up to us: Lessons learned and goals for change after thirteen years of the Washington state domestic violence fatality review. Seattle: Washington State Coalition Against Domestic Violence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida Domestic Violence Fatality Review Team. (2007). Annual report: Executive summary. Tallahassee: Florida Department of Law Enforcement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frye, V., Manganello, J., Campbell, J. C., Walton-Moss, B., & Wilt, S. (2006). The distribution of and factors associated with intimate terrorism and situational couple violence among a population-based sample of urban women in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 1286–1313. doi:10.1177/0886260506291658.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, C. (2007). Domestic violence and child protection: exploring the role of perpetrator risk assessments. Child and Family Social Work, 12, 360–369. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2006.00464.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, P. G., & Juodis, M. (2006). Children as victims and witnesses of domestic homicide: lessons learned from domestic violence death review committees. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 57(3), 13–28. doi:10.1111/j.1755-6988.2006.tb00125.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, P. G., Johnston, J. R., Crooks, C. V., & Bala, N. (2008). Custody disputes involving allegations of domestic violence: toward a differentiated approach to parenting plans. Family Court Review, 46, 500–522. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00216.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, P. G., Wolfe, D. A., & Campbell, M. (2011). Growing up with domestic violence: Assessment, intervention & prevention strategies for children & adolescents. Cambridge: Hogrefe & Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, P. G., Campbell, M., Hamilton, L. H., & Juodis, M. (2012). Children in danger of domestic homicide. Child Abuse & Neglect, 36(1), 71–74. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.06.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kropp, P. R. (2008). Intimate partner violence risk assessment and management. Violence and Victims, 23, 202–222. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.23.2.202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowski, L. A., McFarlane, J., Campbell, J. C., Gary, F., & Barenski, C. (2004). “He killed my mommy!” Murder or attempted murder of a child’s mother. Journal of Family Violence, 19, 211–220. doi:10.1023/B:JOFV.0000032631.36582.23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewenberg, S. (2005). Domestic violence in Spain. The Lancet, 365, 464. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17884-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marleau, J. D., Poulin, B., Webanck, T., Roy, R., & Laporte, L. (1999). Paternal filicide: a study of 10 men. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 44(1), 57–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery County Domestic Violence Death Review Committee (2008). Report number five: Data summary and recommendation. Montgomery County, OH: Author. Retrieved from

  • Nichols-Hadeed, C., Cerulli, C., Kaukeinen, K., Rhodes, K. V., & Campbell, J. (2012). Assessing danger: what judges need to know. Family Court Review, 50(1), 150–158. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01436.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Domestic Violence Death Review Committee (Ontario DVDRC). (2008). Sixth annual report of the Domestic Violence Death Review Committee. Toronto: Office of the Chief Coroner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Domestic Violence Death Review Committee (Ontario DVDRC). (2009). Seventh annual report of the Domestic Violence Death Review Committee. Toronto: Office of the Chief Coroner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Domestic Violence Death Review Committee (Ontario DVDRC) (2010). Eighth annual report of the domestic violence death review committee. Toronto, ON: Office of the Chief Coroner. Retrieved from

  • Roberts, A. R. (2007). Domestic violence continuum, forensic assessment and crisis intervention. Families in Society, 88(1), 42–54. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.3591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. (2009). Family violence in Canada: A statistical profile, 2009. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics. Catalogue No. 85-224-X.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey (Report No. NCJ 181867). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. Retrieved from

  • Turvey, B. E. (2008). Criminal profiling: An introduction to behavioral evidence analysis (3rd ed.). Kidlington: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Websdale, N. (1999). Understanding domestic homicide. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Websdale, N. (2010). Familicidal hearts. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (2005). WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women. Geneva, Switzerland: Author. Retrieved from

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter G. Jaffe.

Additional information

We acknowledge the support of the Office of the Chief Coroner of Ontario. The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors.



Definitions of 12 Most Common DVDRC Risk Factors


The partner wanted to end the relationship or the perpetrator was separated from the victim but wanted to renew the relationship, or there was a sudden and/or recent separation, or the victim had contacted a lawyer and was seeking a separation and/or divorce.


Any actual, attempted, or threatened abuse/maltreatment (physical, emotional, psychological, financial, sexual, etc.) toward a person who has been in, or is in, an intimate relationship with the perpetrator. This incident did not have to necessarily result in charges or convictions and can be verified by any record (e.g., police reports, medical records) or witness (e.g., family members, friends, neighbors, co-workers, counselors, medical personnel, etc.). It could be as simple as a neighbor hearing the perpetrator screaming at the victim or include a co-worker noticing bruises consistent with physical abuse on the victim while at work.


Any actions or behaviors by the perpetrator that indicate an intense preoccupation with the victim. For example, stalking behaviors, such as following the victim, spying on the victim, making repeated phone calls to the victim, or excessive gift giving, etc.


In the opinion of any family, friends, or acquaintances, and regardless of whether or not the perpetrator received treatment, the perpetrator displayed symptoms characteristic of depression.


A diagnosis of depression by any health professional (e.g., family doctor, psychiatrist, psychologist, nurse practitioner) with symptoms recognized by the DSM-IV-TR, regardless of whether or not the perpetrator received treatment.


The abuse/maltreatment (physical, psychological, emotional, sexual, etc.) inflicted upon the victim by the perpetrator was increasing in frequency and/or severity. For example, this can be evidenced by more regular trips for medical attention or include an increase in complaints of abuse to/by family, friends, or other acquaintances.


Any comment made to the victim, or others, that was intended to instill fear for the safety of the victim’s life. These comments could have been delivered verbally, in the form of a letter, or left on an answering machine. Threats can range in degree of explicitness from “I’m going to kill you” to “You’re going to pay for what you did” or “If I can’t have you, then nobody can” or “I’m going to get you.”


Any recent (past 6 months) act or comment made by the perpetrator that was intended to convey the perpetrator’s idea or intent of committing suicide, even if the act or comment was not taken seriously. These comments could have been made verbally, or delivered in letter format, or left on an answering machine. These comments can range from explicit (e.g., “If you ever leave me, then I’m going to kill myself” or “I can’t live without you”) to implicit (“The world would be better off without me”). Acts can include, for example, giving away prized possessions.


Any recent (past 6 months) suicidal behavior (e.g., swallowing pills, holding a knife to one’s throat, etc.), even if the behavior was not taken seriously or did not require arrest, medical attention, or psychiatric committal. Behavior can range in severity from superficially cutting the wrists to actually shooting or hanging oneself.


Any actual or attempted assault on any person who is not, or has not been, in an intimate relationship with the perpetrator. This could include friends, acquaintances, or strangers. This incident did not have to necessarily result in charges or convictions and can be verified by any record (e.g., police reports, medical records) or witness (e.g., family members, friends, neighbors, co-workers, counselors, medical personnel, etc.).


Any non-physical behavior, whether successful or not, that was intended to keep the victim from associating with others. The perpetrator could have used various psychological tactics (e.g., guilt trips) to discourage the victim from associating with family, friends, or other acquaintances in the community (e.g., “If you leave, then don’t even think about coming back,” “I never like it when your parents come over,” or “I’m leaving if you invite your friends here”).


The victim is one that knows the perpetrator best and can accurately gauge his level of risk. If the woman discloses to anyone her fear of the perpetrator harming herself or her children, for example statements such as, “I fear for my life,” “I think he will hurt me,” or “I need to protect my children.”

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamilton, L.H.A., Jaffe, P.G. & Campbell, M. Assessing Children’s Risk for Homicide in the Context of Domestic Violence. J Fam Viol 28, 179–189 (2013).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: