Advertisement

Journal of Family Violence

, 24:75 | Cite as

Perceived Risk for Future Intimate Partner Violence among Women in a Domestic Violence Shelter

  • Hilary G. Harding
  • Marie Helweg-Larsen
Original Article

Abstract

Research investigating women’s risk assessments for intimate partner violence (IPV) shows that women can predict future violence with relative accuracy. Limited research has investigated factors that are associated with perceived risk and the potential behavioral consequences of victim risk perception. Results from a survey of women in a domestic violence shelter (N = 56) indicated that women perceive lower risk of future violence if the abusive relationship were to end and higher risk of violence if it were to continue. Certain abuse experiences were related to elevated perceptions of personal risk for future violence. Further, perceived personal risk predicted the women’s intention to terminate their relationship upon leaving shelter. Results are discussed as they may inform interventions preventing IPV.

Keywords

Intimate partner violence Risk perception Relationship decisions Domestic violence shelters 

References

  1. Anderson, D. J. (2003). The impact on subsequent violence of returning to an abusive partner. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 34, 93–112.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, M. A., Gillig, P. M., Sitaker, M., McCloskey, K., Malloy, K., & Grigsby, N. (2003). “Why doesn’t she just leave?”: A descriptive study of victim reported impediments to her safety. Journal of Family Violence, 18, 151–155. doi: 10.1023/A:1023564404773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.651.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arias, I., & Corso, P. (2005). Average cost per person victimized by an intimate partner of the opposite gender: A comparison of men and women. Violence and Victims, 20, 379–391. doi: 10.1891/vivi.2005.20.4.379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell, M. E., Goodman, L. A., & Dutton, M. A. (2007). The dynamics of staying and leaving: Implications for battered women’s emotional well-being and experiences of violence at the end of a year. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 413–428. doi: 10.1007/s10896-007-9096-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brewer, N. T., Weinstein, N. D., Cuite, C. L., & Herrington, J. F. (2004). Risk perceptions and their relation to risk behavior. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 27, 125–130. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm2702_7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brewer, N. T., Chapman, G. B., Gibbons, F. X., Gerrard, M., McCaul, K. D., & Weinstein, N. D. (2007). Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: The example of vaccination. Health Psychology, 26, 136–145. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, A. L., Messman-Moore, T. L., Miller, A. G., & Stasser, G. (2005). Sexual victimization in relation to perceptions of risk: Mediation, generalization, and temporal stability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 963–976. doi: 10.1177/0146167204274101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell, J., Sharps, P., & Glass, N. (2001). Risk assessment for intimate partner homicide. In: G. F. Pinard & L. Pagani (Eds.), Clinical assessment of dangerousness. Cambridge University Press, Cambrige, pp. 136–157.Google Scholar
  10. Campbell, J. C., Webster, D., Koziol-McLain, J., Block, C., Campbell, D., Curry, M. A., et al. (2003). Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: Results from a multisite case control study. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1089–1097.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cattaneo, L. (2007). Contributors to assessments of risk in intimate partner violence: How victims and professionals differ. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 57–75. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cattaneo, L., & Goodman, L. (2003). Victim-reported risk factors for continued abusive behavior: Assessing the dangerousness of arrested batterers. Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 349–369. doi: 10.1002/jcop.10056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cattaneo, L., & Goodman, L. (2005). Risk factors for re-abuse in intimate partner violence: A cross disciplinary critical review. Trauma, Violence and Abuse: A Review Journal, 6, 141–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cattaneo, L., Bell, M. E., Goodman, L. A., & Dutton, M. A. (2007). Intimate partner violence victims’ accuracy in assessing their risk of re-abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 429–440. doi: 10.1007/s10896-007-9097-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gondolf, E. W., & Heckert, D. A. (2003). Determinants of women’s perceptions of risk in battering relationships. Violence and Victims, 18, 371–386. doi: 10.1891/vivi.2003.18.4.371.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heckert, D. A., & Gondolf, E. W. (2004). Battered women’s perceptions of risk versus risk factors and instruments in predicting repeat assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 778–799. doi: 10.1177/0886260504265619.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Helweg-Larsen, M. (1999). (The lack of) optimistic biases in response to the 1994 Northridge earthquake: The role of personal experience. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 119–129.Google Scholar
  18. Helweg-Larsen, M., & Shepperd, J. A. (2001). Do moderators of the optimistic bias affect personal or target risk estimates? A review of the literature. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 74–95. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0501_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Helweg-Larsen, M., Harding, H., & Kleinman, K. (2008). Risk perceptions of dating violence among college women: The role of experience and depressive symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27, 600–620. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2008.27.6.600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hendy, H. M., Eggen, D., Gustitus, C., McLeod, K. C., & Ng, P. (2003). Decision to leave scale: Perceived reasons to stay in or leave violent relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 162–173. doi: 10.1111/1471-6402.00096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kernsmith, P. (2006). Gender differences in the impact of family of origin violence on perpetrators of domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 21, 163–171. doi: 10.1007/s10896-005-9014-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Krause, E. D., Kaltman, S., Goodman, L. A., & Dutton, M. A. (2006). Role of distinct PTSD symptoms in intimate partner reabuse: A prospective study. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 19, 507–516. doi: 10.1002/jts.20136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marshall, A. D., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (2002). Varying forms of husband sexual aggression: Predictors and subgroup differences. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 286–296. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.16.3.286.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martin, A. J., Berenson, K. R., Griffing, S., Sage, R. E., Madry, L., Bingham, L. E., & Primm, B. J. (2000). The process of leaving an abusive relationship: The role of risk assessments and decision-certainty. Journal of Family Violence, 15, 109–121. doi: 10.1023/A:1007515514298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nicolaidis, C., Curry, M., Ulrich, Y., Sharps, P., McFarlane, J., Campbell, D., et al. (2003). Could we have known? A qualitative analysis of data from women who survived an attempted homicide by an intimate partner. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 18, 788–794. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21202.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scale (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316. doi: 10.1177/019251396017003001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence against Women Survey (Publication No. NCJ 181867). Washington, DC: Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  28. Weinstein, N. D. (1988). The precaution adoption process. Health Psychology, 7, 355–386. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.7.4.355.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Weinstein, N. D. (1989). Effects of personal experience on self-protective behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 31–50. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Weinstein, N. D., & Nicholich, M. (1993). Correct and incorrect interpretations between risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Health Psychology, 12, 235–245. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.12.3.235.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Weinstein, N. D., Rothmanm, A. J., & Nicholich, M. (1998). Use of correlational data to examine the effects of risk perceptions on precautionary behavior. Psychology & Health, 13, 479–501. doi: 10.1080/08870449808407305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weinstein, N. D., Kwitel, A., McCaul, K. D., Magnan, R. E., Gerrard, M., & Gibbons, F. X. (2007). Risk perceptions: Assessment and relationship to influenza vaccination. Health Psychology, 26, 146–151. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.146.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Weisz, A. N., Tolman, R. M., & Saunders, D. G. (2000). Assessing the risk of severe domestic violence: The importance of survivors’ predictions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 75–90. doi: 10.1177/088626000015001006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wilson, M., Daly, M., & Wright, C. (1993). Uxoricide in Canada: Demographic risk patterns. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 35, 263–291.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyDickinson CollegeCarlisleUSA

Personalised recommendations