Advertisement

Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 173–181 | Cite as

Outcomes of Case Management for African-American Men in Batterer Counseling

  • Edward W. Gondolf
Original article

Abstract

Case management for additional referrals has been recommended especially for African-American men in batterer counseling programs. Additional services addressing “at risk” needs may help to improve batterer program outcomes. To test this expectation, a quasi-experimental evaluation of a case management project was conducted for both “intention-to-treat” and “received-treatment.” The case management included brief assessment at batterer program intake, referral to relevant services, and follow-up calls from batterer program staff. Re-assault and re-arrests during a 12-month follow-up, along with program dropout from the 16 required sessions of the batterer program, were compared for 202 African-American program participants under case management and a sample of 482 African-American participants previously in the batterer program. In both bivariate and confirmatory multivariate analyses, neither the case management nor actual service contact significantly improved outcomes. However, the small portion of men contacting drug and alcohol treatment did tend toward better program outcomes. Poor implementation of the case management procedures may have contributed to the overall weak effects.

Keywords

Batterer counseling Case management African-American men Domestic violence 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The evaluation research was conducted by the staff of the Mid-Atlantic Addiction Training Institute that included Crystal Deemer, Project Director; Gayle Moyer and Vera Bonnet, Research Assistants; Santiago Sanz, Data Manager; and Megan Kensey, Data Entry Specialist. The project was developed and implemented at the Domestic Abuse Counseling Center in Pittsburgh under the direction of Robert Foster, CEO, and Larry Graziano, Chief Operating Officer. Trudy Paul Bernnardo, Program Director, coordinated and conducted much of the case management, and Nicole Malseed assisted with clinical records and subject contact. The domestic violence court of Pittsburgh Municipal Courts also contributed in its referrals to and support of the project. Jack Simmons, the Chief Administrator of the Municipal Courts, was instrumental in the collaboration with this court. This study of case management was made possible through a grant from the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency (PCCD Grant # 01-DS-19-12069). It followed an evaluation of specialized batterer counseling for African-American men funded by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ Grant #: 2001-WT-BX-0003), and its results are compared to information derived from that previous evaluation. The conclusions of this report do not necessarily reflect the views of PCCD or NIJ.

References

  1. Allen, N. (2006). An examination of the effectiveness of domestic violence coordinating councils. Violence Against Women, 12, 46–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett, L. (1998). In defense of batterer-program standards. Families in Society, 79, 93–97.Google Scholar
  3. Blake, W., & Darling, C. (1994). The dilemmas of the African-American male. Journal of Black Studies, 24, 402–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dobash, R. E., Dobash, R. P., Cavanagh, K., & Lewis, R. (2000). Changing violent men. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Gondolf, E. (1999). Characteristics of court-mandated batterers in four cities: Diversity and dichotomies. Violence Against Women, 5, 1277–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gondolf, E. (2002). Batterer intervention systems: Issues, outcomes, and recommendations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Gondolf, E. (2007a). Culturally-focused batterer counseling for African-American men: A clinical trial of re-assault and re-arrest outcomes. Criminology and Public Policy, 6, 341–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gondolf, E. (2007b). Supplemental mental health treatment for batterer program participants (Grant #: 2003-MU-MU-0002). Final report to the National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC (available at www.iup.edu/maati/publications).
  9. Gondolf, E. (2007c) Implementation of case management for batterer program participants. Violence Against Women, in press.Google Scholar
  10. Gondolf, E., & Deemer, C. (2004). Phoning logistics in a longitudinal follow-up of batterers and their partners. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 747–765.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gondolf, E., & Jones, A. (2001). The program effect of batterer programs in three cities. Violence and Victims, 16, 693–704.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gondolf, E., & Williams, O. (2001). Culturally-focused batterer counseling for African-American men. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 4, 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hamberger, L. K. (2002). The men’s group program: A community-based, cognitive-behavioral, pro-feminist intervention program. In E. Aldarondo & F. Mederos (Eds.) Men who batter: Intervention and prevention strategies in a diverse society (pp. 7-1–7-43). New York: Civic Research Institute.Google Scholar
  14. Hampton, R., Carrillo, R., & Kim, J. (1998). Violence in communities of color. Family violence and men of color: Healing the wounded male spirit (pp. 74–94). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Hotaling, G., & Sugarman, D. (1986). An analysis of risk markers in husband to wife violence: The current state of knowledge. Violence and Victims, 1, 101–124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones, A., D’Agostino, R., Gondolf, E., & Heckert, A. (2004). Assessing the effect of batterer program completion on reassault using propensity scores. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1002–1020.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jones, A., & Gondolf, E. (2001). Time-varying risk factors for re-assault by batterer program participants. Journal of Family Violence, 16, 345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Labriola, M., Rempel, M., O’Sullivan, C., & Frank, P. (2007). Court responses to batterer program noncompliance: A national perspective. New York: Center for Court Innovation (available at www.courtinnovation.org).Google Scholar
  19. Mederos, F. (2002). Changing our visions of intervention: The evolution of programs for physically abusive men. In E. Aldarondo & F. Mederos (Eds.) Men who batter: Intervention and prevention strategies in a diverse society (pp. 1-2–1-26). New York: Civic Research Institute.Google Scholar
  20. Oliver, W. (1994). The violent social world of African-American men. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  21. Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (2003). Creating a process of change for men who batter: The Duluth curriculum. Duluth, MN: Minnesota Program Development available at www.duluth-model.org.Google Scholar
  22. Pence, E., & Shepard, M. (1999). Developing a coordinated community response. In M. Shepard & E. Pence (Eds.) Coordinating community responses to domestic violence: Lessons from Duluth and beyond (pp. 3–25). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Rasheed, J., & Rasheed, M. (Eds.) (1999). Social work practice with African-American men: The invisible presence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Richie, B. (2000). A black feminist’s reflection on the antiviolence movement. Signs, 25, 1133–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Russell, M. (1995). Confronting abusive beliefs: Group treatment for abusive men. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Stordeur, R., & Stille, R. (1989). Ending men’s violence against their partners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Straus, M. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tolman, R. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners. Violence and Victims, 4, 159–177.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Visher, C., Newmark, L., & Harrell, A. (2006). Final report on the evaluation of the Judicial oversight demonstration (Volume 2): Findings and lessons on implementation. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  30. White, R., & Gondolf, E. (2000). Implications of personality profiles for batterers treatment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 467–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Williams, O. (1993). Developing an African-American perspective to reduce spouse abuse: Considerations for community action. Black Caucus: Journal of the National Association of Black Social Workers, 1(2), 1–8.Google Scholar
  32. Williams, O. (1994). Group work with African-American men who batter: Toward more ethnically-sensitive practice. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 25, 91–103.Google Scholar
  33. Williams, O. (1998). Healing and confronting the African-American male who batters. In R. Carillo & J. Tello (Eds.) Family violence and men of color: Healing the wounded male spirit (pp. 74–94). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Williams, O. (2000). Working in groups with African-American men who batter. In L. D. Davis (Ed.), A guide to working with African-American men. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mid-Atlantic Addiction Training Institute (MAATI)Indiana University of PennsylvaniaIndianaUSA

Personalised recommendations