Advertisement

Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 101–111 | Cite as

Observed Initiation and Reciprocity of Physical Aggression in Young, At-Risk Couples

  • Deborah M. Capaldi
  • Hyoun K. Kim
  • Joann Wu Shortt
Original Article

Abstract

The present study examined sex differences in initiation of physical aggression as observed during discussion tasks and in the likelihood of a similar response from the partner. In addition, patterns for men and women in the prevalence of aggression initiation and partner reciprocation across 4 time points spanning approximately 9 years from late adolescence through the mid-20s are examined, as well as overall associations with reported aggression and injuries. Findings indicated that the young women were more likely than the men to initiate physical aggression at late adolescence. However, by the mid-20s in early adulthood there were no significant sex differences in initiation rates. The average rates of reciprocation across the 4 time points appeared to be similar for men and women. Women and men appeared more likely to report injuries if the couples observed involved mutual physical aggression in their interactions.

Keywords

Observed physical aggression Initiation Reciprocation Injury 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The Cognitive, Social and Affective Development, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), and Division of Epidemiology, Services and Prevention Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) provided support for the Couples Study (HD 46364). Additional support was provided by Grant MH 37940 from the Antisocial and Other Personality Disorders Program, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), U.S. PHS; Grant DA 051485 from the Division of Epidemiology, Services and Prevention Branch, NIDA, and Cognitive, Social, and Affective Development, NICHD, NIH, U.S. PHS; and Grant MH 46690 from the Prevention, Early Intervention, and Epidemiology Branch, NIMH, and Office of Research on Minority Health, U.S. PHS.

References

  1. Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnett, O. W., Lee, C. Y., & Thelen, R. E. (1997). Gender differences in attributions of self-defense and control in interpartner aggression. Violence Against Women, 3, 462–481.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brush, L. (1990). Violent acts and injurious outcomes in married couples: Methodological issues in the National Survey of Families and Households. Gender & Society, 4, 156–167.Google Scholar
  4. Buss, D. M. (1987). Selection, evocation, and manipulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1214–1221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Capaldi, D. M., & Crosby, L. (1997). Observed and reported psychological and physical aggression in young, at-risk couples. Social Development, 6, 184–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Capaldi, D. M., Crosby, L., & Stoolmiller, M. (1996). Predicting the timing of first sexual intercourse for at-risk adolescent males. Child Development, 67, 344–359.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Capaldi, D. M., & Gorman-Smith, D. (2003). The development of aggression in young male/female couples. In P. Florsheim (Ed.), Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior: Theory, research, and practical implications (pp. 243–278), Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Capaldi, D. M., Kim, H. K., & Shortt, J. W. (2004). Women’s involvement in aggression in young adult romantic relationships: A developmental systems model. In M. Putallez, & K. L. Bierman (Eds.), Aggression, antisocial behavior, and violence among girls: A developmental perspective (pp. 223–241), New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  9. Capaldi, D. M., & Owen, L. D. (2001). Physical aggression in a community sample of at-risk young couples: Gender comparisons for high frequency, injury, and fear. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 425–440.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Capaldi, D. M., Shortt, J. W., & Crosby, L. (2003). Physical and psychological aggression in at-risk young couples: Stability and change in young adulthood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cascardi, M., Langhinrichsen, J., & Vivian, D. (1992). Marital aggression, impact, injury, and health correlates for husbands and wives. Archives of Internal Medicine, 152, 1178–1184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cascardi, M., & Vivian, D. (1995). Context for specific episodes of marital violence: Gender and severity of violence differences. Journal of Family Violence, 10, 265–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen, J. A. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.Google Scholar
  14. Cordova, J. V., Jacobson, N. S., Gottman, J. M., Rushe, R., & Cox, G. (1993). Negative reciprocity and communication in couples with a violent husband. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 559–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeMaris, A. (1992). Male versus female initiation of aggression: The case of courtship violence. In E. C. Viano (Ed.), Intimate violence: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 111–120), Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  16. Dishion, T. J., Andrews, D. W., & Crosby, L. (1995). Antisocial boys and their friends in adolescence: Relationship characteristics, quality, and interactional processes. Child Development, 66, 139–151.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Feld, S. L., & Straus, M. A. (1989). Escalation and desistance of wife assault in marriage. Criminology, 27, 141–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fiebert, M. S., & Gonzalez, D. M. (1997). College women who initiate assaults on their male partners and the reasons offered for such behavior. Psychological Reports, 80, 583–590.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Follingstad, D. R., Wright, S., Lloyd, S., & Sebastian, J. A. (1991). Sex differences in motivations and effects in dating violence. Family Relations, 40, 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gelles, R. J., & Straus, M. A. (1988). Intimate violence: The causes and consequences of abuse in the American family. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  21. Gergen, M. (1990). Beyond the evil empire: Horsesplay and aggression. Aggression and Behavior, 16, 381–398.Google Scholar
  22. Gray, H. M., & Foshee, V. A. (1997). Adolescent dating violence: Differences between one-sided and mutually violent profiles. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 126–141.Google Scholar
  23. Harned, M. S. (2001). Abused women or abused men? An examination of the context and outcomes of dating violence. Violence and Victims, 16, 269–285.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Henton, J. M., Cate, R. M., Koval, J., Lloyd, S., & Christopher, F. S. (1983). Romance and violence in dating relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 4, 467–482.Google Scholar
  25. Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kessler, R. C. (1990). The national comorbidity survey. DIS Newsletter, 7(12), 1–2.Google Scholar
  27. Kim, H. K., & Capaldi, D. M. (2004). The association of antisocial behavior and depressive symptoms between partners and risk for aggression in romantic relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 82–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lawrence, E. (2002). Emerging perspectives in the study of physical aggression in intimate relationships. Couples Research and Therapy, 8, 3–6.Google Scholar
  29. Makepeace, J. M. (1986). Gender differences in courtship violence victimization. Family Relations, 35, 383–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Markman, H. J., Notarius, C. I., Stephen, T., & Smith, T. (1981). Behavioral observation systems for couples: The current status. In E. Filsinger, & R. Lewis (Eds.), Assessing marriage: New behavioral approaches. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Morse, B. J. (1995). Beyond the Conflict Tactics Scales: Assessing gender differences in partner violence. Violence and Victims, 10, 251–272.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. O’Leary, K. D. (1999). Developmental and affective issues in assessing and treating partner aggression. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 400–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Leary, K. D., & Slep, A. M. S. (2003). A dyadic longitudinal model of adolescent dating aggression. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 314–327.Google Scholar
  34. Patterson, G. R., Reid, J. B., & Dishion, T. J. (1992). A social learning approach: Antisocial boys (Vol. 4). Eugene, OR: Castalia Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. Scarr, S., & McCartney, K. (1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype leading to environment effects. Child Development, 54, 424–435.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Stets, J. E., & Straus, M. A. (1990). Gender differences in reporting marital violence and its medical and psychological consequences. In M. A. Straus, & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 151–166). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  37. Straus, M. A. (1997). Physical assaults by women partners: A major social problem. In M. R. Walsh (Ed.), Women, men and gender: Ongoing debates. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316.Google Scholar
  39. Stubbs, J., Crosby, L., Forgatch, M., & Capaldi, D. M. (1998). Family and Peer Process Code: Training manual: A synthesis of three OSLC behavior codes. Eugene OR: Oregon Social Learning Center.Google Scholar
  40. Sugarman, D. B., & Hotaling, G. I. (1989). Dating violence: Prevalence, context, and risk markers. In M. A. Pirog-Good, & J. E. Stets (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships: Emerging social issues (pp. 3–32). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  41. Swan, S. C., & Snow, D. L. (2002). A typology of women’s use of violence in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 8, 286–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Swan, S. C., & Snow, D. L. (2003). Behavioral and psychological differences among women who use violence in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 9, 75–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Walker, L. E. (1989). Psychology and violence against women. American Journal of Psychology, 44, 695–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Watson, J. M., Cascardi, M., Avery-Leaf, S., & O’Leary, K. D. (2001). High school students’ responses to dating aggression. Violence and Victims, 16, 339–348.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Yllö, K. A. (1993). Through a feminist lens: Gender, power, and violence. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 3–32). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah M. Capaldi
    • 1
  • Hyoun K. Kim
    • 1
  • Joann Wu Shortt
    • 1
  1. 1.Oregon Social Learning CenterEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations