Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 329–339 | Cite as

Sex of Spouse Abuse Offender and Directionality of Abuse as Predictors of Personal Distress, Interpersonal Functioning, and Perceptions of Family Climate

  • Lisa Taylor
  • Joe F. Pittman


This study examines perceptions of personal distress, interpersonal functioning and family climate reported by men and women involved in unidirectional versus bidirectional spouse abuse. Participants were 7253 offenders treated by the USAF Family Advocacy Program from 1988 to 1996. Over a quarter of the sample is female and included among them were both unidirectional and bidirectional offenders. Grouping factors for the analysis are gender, directionality of aggression, history of abuse in childhood, history of recidivism, and severity of aggression. Females and offenders raised in abusive homes reported more negative perceptions across the measured spheres. Unidirectional abusers reported more personal distress, but bidirectional abuse had more conflicted family climates. Few differences were noted in offenders' perceptions based on the severity of their abuse or their history of repeat offenses. Tests for interactions yielded no reliable pattern indicating that grouping factors were related to outcomes in an additive fashion.


spouse abuse sex of offender mutual abuse severity of abuse recidivism childhood history of abuse 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anglin, K., and Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (1997). Comparing the responses of maritally violent and nonviolent spouses to problematic marital and nonmarital situations: Are the skill deficits of physically aggressive husbands and wives global? J. Fam. Psychol. 11: 301–313.Google Scholar
  2. Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychol. Bull. 126: 651–680.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brinkeroff, M. B., and Lupri, E. (1988). Interspousal violence. Can. J. Sociol. 13: 407–434.Google Scholar
  4. Dobash, R. P., Dobash, R. E., Wilson, M., and Daly, M. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Soc. Prob. 39: 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hamby, S. L., and Sugarman, D. B. (1999). Acts of psychological aggression against a partner and their relation to physical assault and gender. J. Marriage Fam. 61: 959–970.Google Scholar
  6. Hudson, W. W. (1982). The Clinical Measurement Package: A Field Manual, Dorsey, Homewood, IL.Google Scholar
  7. Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. J. Marriage Fam. 57: 283–294.Google Scholar
  8. Johnson, M. P., and Ferraro, K. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. J. Marriage Fam. 62: 948–963.Google Scholar
  9. Kwong, M. J., Bartholomew, K., and Dutton, D. G. (1999). Gender differences in patterns of relationship violence. Can. J. Behav.l Sci. 31: 150–160.Google Scholar
  10. Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Neidig, P., and Thorn, G. (1995). Violent marriages: Gender differences in levels of current violence and past abuse. J. Fam. Viol. 10: 159–176.Google Scholar
  11. Lehr, R. F., and Fitzsimmons, G. (1991). Adaptability and cohesion: Implications for understanding the violence-prone system. J. Fam. Violence 6: 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lloyd, S. A. (1990). Conflict types and strategies in violent marriages. J. Fam. Violence 5: 269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lloyd, S. A. (1996). Physical aggression, distress, and everyday marital interaction. In Cahn, D. D., and Lloyd, S. A. (eds.), Family Violence From a Communication Perspective, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 177–198.Google Scholar
  14. Madgol, L., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A.., Newman, D. L., Fagan, J., and Silva, P. A. (1997). Gender differences in partner violence in a birth cohort of 21-year olds: Bridging the gap between clinical and epidemiological approaches. J. Counsel. Clin. Psychol. 65: 68–78.Google Scholar
  15. McFarlane, J., and Willson, P. (2000). Intimate partner violence. J. Interpers. Violence 15: 158–169.Google Scholar
  16. Meredith, W. H., Abbott, D. A., and Adams, S. L. (1986). Family violence: Its relation to marital and parental satisfaction and family strengths. J. Fam. Violence 4: 299–305.Google Scholar
  17. Milner, J. S. (1986). The Child Abuse Potential Inventory Manual, 2nd edn., PSYTEC, Decalb, IL.Google Scholar
  18. Milner, J. S. (1994). Assessing physical child abuse risk: The Child Abuse Potential Inventory. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 14: 547–583.Google Scholar
  19. Moos, R. H., and Moos, B. S. (1986). Family Environment Scale Manual, 2nd edn., Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  20. Nazroo, J. (1995). Uncovering gender differences in the use of marital violence: The effect of methodology. Sociology 29: 475–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stets, J. E. and Straus, M. (1989). The marriage as a hitting license: A comparison of assaults in dating, cohabitating, and married couples. J. Fam. Violence 4: 161–180.Google Scholar
  22. Stets, J. E., and Straus, M. A. (1990). Gender differences in reporting marital violence and its medical and psychological consequences. In Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (eds.), Physical Violence in American Families, Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 151–165.Google Scholar
  23. Straus, M. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. J. Marriage Fam. 41: 75–88.Google Scholar
  24. Straus, M. (1980). Victims and aggressors in marital violence. Am. Behav. Sci. 23: 681–704.Google Scholar
  25. Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (1986). Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys. J. Marriage Fam. 48: 465–479.Google Scholar
  26. Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (1990). How violent are American families? Estimates from the National Family Violence Resurvey and other studies. In Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (eds.), Physical Violence in American Families, Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 95–112.Google Scholar
  27. Straus, M. A., and Sweet, S. (1992). Verbal/symbolic aggression in couples: Incidence rates and relationships to personal characteristics. J. Marriage Fam. 54: 346–357.Google Scholar
  28. Thompson, E. H. (1991). The maleness of violence in dating relationships: An appraisal of stereotypes. Sex Roles 24: 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vivian, D., and Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (1994). Are bi-directionally violent couples mutually victimized? A gender-sensitive comparison. Violence Victims 9: 107–124.Google Scholar
  30. Zlotnick, C., Kohn, R., Peterson, J., and Pearlstein, T. (1998). Partner physical victimization in a national sample of American families. Relationship to psychological functioning, psychosocial factors, and gender. J. Interpers. Violence 13: 156–166.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Auburn UniversityAuburn
  2. 2.Department of Human Development and Family StudiesAuburn UniversityAuburn

Personalised recommendations