Skip to main content
Log in

The Effects of Scale Carving on Instruments Assessing Violence

  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Little research has examined the properties of survey instruments when the full instrument is not administered (scale carving). The purpose of the present study was to test scale carving effects on survey instruments. Participants completed carved and whole versions of two instruments measuring violent behaviors and attitudes at two sessions. Findings indicated that administering select subscales rather than the entire instrument affects psychometric properties of certain instruments. For instance, mean scores of certain instruments differed depending upon whether the instruments were administered in their entirety or in carved versions. Reliability coefficients did not differ between carved and whole versions, and correlation coefficients were moderate. Therefore, psychometric properties of carved instruments should be assessed prior to their use in research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ammerman, R. T., and Hersen, M. (1992). Current issues in the assessment of family violence. In Ammerman, R. T., and Hersen, M. (eds.), Assessment of family violence: A clinical and legal sourcebook (pp. 3–10). Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barling, J., O’Leary, K. D., Jouriles, E. N., Vivian, D., and MacEwen, K. E., (1987). Factor similarity of the CTS across samples, spouses, and sites. J. Fam. Violence 2: 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruning, J. L., and Kintz, B. L. (1977). Computational handbook of statistics. Scott, Foresman, and Company, Glenview, IL.

  • Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 38: 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, A. H., and Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 63: 452–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantos, A. L., Neidig, P. H., and O’Leary, K. D. (1994). Injuries of women and men in a treatment program for domestic violence. J. Fam. Violence 9: 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. C., and Shuminsky, T. R. (1990). Self-awareness mediates the relationship between serial position and item reliability. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 59: 1301–1307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D. A., and McLaughlin, M. E. (1993). Cognitive processes in self-report responses: Tests of item context effects in work attitude measures. J. Appl. Psychol. 78: 129–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D. A., McLaughlin, M. E., and Coalter, T. M. (1996). Context, cognition, and common method variance: Psychometric and verbal protocol evidence. Organ. Behav. Hum. Deci. Process. 68: 246–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. N. (1970). A sequential system for personality scale development. In Spielberger, C. D. (Ed.), Current topics in clinical and community psychology, (Vol. II) Academic Press, New York, pp. 61–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, E. S. (1988). Item context effects on personality scales: Measuring changes the measure. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 55: 312–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loevinger, J. (1957). Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. Psychological Reports 3: Monograph Supplement 9.

  • MacKay, N. J., and Covell, K. (1997). The impact of women in advertisements on attitudes toward women. Sex Roles 36: 573–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmark, L., Harrell, A., and Salem, P. (1995). Domestic violence and empowerment in custody and visitation cases. Fam. Conciliation Courts Rev. 33: 30–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodenburg, F. A., and Fantuzzo, J. W. (1993). The measure of wife abuse: Steps toward the development of a comprehensive assessment technique. J. Fam. Violence 8: 203–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1984). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.

  • Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. Am. Psychol. 54: 93–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, M. F., and Campbell, J. A. (1992). The abusive behavior inventory: A measure of psychological and physical abuse. J. Interpers. Violence 7: 291–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Lawrence, J. S., and Joyner, D. J. (1991). The effects of sexually violent rock music on males’ acceptance of violence against women. Psychol. Women Q. 15: 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L. (1994). Context and serial-order effects in personality measurement: Limits on the generality of measuring changes the measure. Journal of Personal. Soc. Psychol. 66: 341–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. J. Marriage Fam. 12: 75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., and Sugarman, D. B. (1996). Therevised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2). J. Fam. Issues 17: 283–316.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sujata Desai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Desai, S., Braitman, K.A. The Effects of Scale Carving on Instruments Assessing Violence. J Fam Viol 20, 101–107 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-005-3173-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-005-3173-8

Keywords

Navigation