Advertisement

Journal of Fluorescence

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 2069–2094 | Cite as

Application of 3-D Fluorescence: Characterization of Natural Organic Matter in Natural Water and Water Purification Systems

  • Guocheng Zhu
  • Yongning Bian
  • Andrew S. Hursthouse
  • Peng Wan
  • Katarzyna Szymanska
  • Jiangya Ma
  • Xiaofeng Wang
  • Zilong Zhao
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Natural organic matter (NOM) found in water sources is broadly defined as a mixture of polyfunctional organic molecules, characterized by its complex structure and paramount influence on water quality. Because the inevitable release of pollutants into aquatic environments due to an ineffective control of industrial and agricultural pollution, the evaluation of the interaction of NOM with heavy metals, nanoparticles, organic pollutants and other pollutants in the aquatic environment, has greatly increased. Three-dimensional (3-D) fluorescence has the potential to reveal the interaction mechanisms between NOM and pollutants as well as the source of NOM pollution. In water purification engineering system, the 3-D fluorescence can indicate the variations of NOM composition and gives an effective prediction of water quality as well as the underline water purification mechanisms. Inadequately treated NOM is a cause of precursors of disinfection byproducts (DBPs), posing a potential threat to human health. Effective control and measurement/evaluation of NOM have long been an important factors in the prevention of water pollution. Overall, 3-D fluorescence allows for a rapid identification of organic components thus indicating possible sources of water pollution, mechanisms of pollutant interactions, and possible DBPs formed during conventional treatment of this water. This article reviews the 3-D fluorescence characteristics of NOM in natural water and typical water purification systems. The 3-D fluorescence was effective for indicating the variabilities in NOM composition and chemistry thus providing a better understanding of NOM in natural water system and water engineering system.

Keywords

3-D fluorescence Natural water Natural organic matter Water purification 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China. (No. 51408215 and 51408004) and by Innovate UK, through KTP009641 (KS). ASH acknowledges the support of Hunan Provincial Government and Hunan University of Science & Technology through High End Expert Scholarship.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmad UK, Ulang Z, Yusop Z, Fong TL (2002) Fluorescence technique for the characterization of natural organic matter in river water. Water Sci Technol 46(9):117–125PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ishii SK, Boyer TH (2012) Behavior of reoccurring PARAFAC components in fluorescent dissolved organic matter in natural and engineered systems: a critical review. Environ Sci Technol 46(4):2006–2017PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hudson N, Baker A, Reynolds D (2007) Fluorescence analysis of dissolved organic matter in natural, waste and polluted waters—a review. River Res Appl 23(6):631–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marhaba TF, Lippincott RL (2000) Application of fluorescence technique for rapid identification of DOM fractions in source waters. J Environ Eng 126(11):1039–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhu G, Yin J, Zhang P, Wang X, Fan G, Hua B, Ren B, Zheng H, Deng B (2014) DOM removal by flocculation process: fluorescence excitation–emission matrix spectroscopy (EEMs) characterization. Desalination 346:38–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hofbauer DEW, Andrews SA (2004) Influence of UV irradiation and UV/hydrogen peroxide oxidation process on natural organic matter fluorescence characteristics. Water Sci Tech-W Sup 4(4):41–46Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stedmon CA, Markager S, Bro R (2003) Tracing dissolved organic matter in aquatic environments using a new approach to fluorescence spectroscopy. Mar Chem 82(3):239–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huang L, Zhuo J, Guo W, Spencer RG, Zhang Z, Xu J (2013) Tracing organic matter removal in polluted coastal waters via floating bed phytoremediation. Mar Pollut Bull 71(1):74–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hur J, Hwang S-J, Shin J-K (2008) Using synchronous fluorescence technique as a water quality monitoring tool for an urban river. Water Air Soil Pollut 191(1–4):231–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fan Z, Gong S, Xu X, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Yu X (2014) Characterization, DBPs formation, and mutagenicity of different organic matter fractions in two source waters. Int J Hyg Environ Health 217(2):300–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baghoth SA, Dignum M, Grefte A, Kroesbergen J, Amy GL (2009) Characterization of NOM in a drinking water treatment process train with no disinfectant residual. Water Sci Tech-W Sup 9(4):379–386Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Coble PG (1996) Characterization of marine and terrestrial DOM in seawater using excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy. Marine chemistry 51(4):325–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Henderson R, Baker A, Murphy K, Hambly A, Stuetz R, Khan S (2009) Fluorescence as a potential monitoring tool for recycled water systems: a review. Water Res 43(4):863–881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Crittenden J, Trussell RR, Hand DW, Howe KJ, Tchobanoglous G (2005) Water treatment: principles and design, vol 2E. Wiley, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang DS, Liu HL, Yan MQ, Yu JF, Tang HX (2006) Enhanced coagulation vs. optimized coagulation: a critical review. Acta Sci Circum Stantiae 26(4):544–551Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Singer P (1999) Humic substances as precursors for potentially harmful disinfection by-products. Water Sci Technol 40(9):25–30Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stedmon CA, Bro R (2008) Characterizing dissolved organic matter fluorescence with parallel factor analysis: a tutorial. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 6(11):572–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bahram M, Bro R, Stedmon C, Afkhami A (2006) Handling of Rayleigh and Raman scatter for PARAFAC modeling of fluorescence data using interpolation. J Chemometr 20(3–4):99–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hudson N, Baker A, Ward D, Reynolds DM, Brunsdon C, Carliellmarquet C, Browning S (2008) Can fluorescence spectrometry be used as a surrogate for the Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) test in water quality assessment? An example from South West England. Sci Total Environ 391(1):149–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Green SA, Blough NV (1994) Optical absorption and fluorescence properties of chromophoric dissolved organic matter in natural waters. Limnol Oceanogr 39(8):1903–1916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lakowicz JR (2006) Principles of fluorescence spectroscopy. Springer Science & Business Media, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zularisam A, Ismail A, Salim R (2006) Behaviours of natural organic matter in membrane filtration for surface water treatment—a review. Desalination 194(1–3):211–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Westerhoff P, Aiken G, Amy G, Debroux J (1999) Relationships between the structure of natural organic matter and its reactivity towards molecular ozone and hydroxyl radicals. Water Res 33(10):2265–2276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Myllykangas T, Nissinen T, Rantakokko P, Martikainen P, Vartiainen T (2002) Molecular size fractions of treated aquatic humus. Water Res 36(12):3045–3053PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nissinen T, Miettinen I, Martikainen P, Vartiainen T (2001) Molecular size distribution of natural organic matter in raw and drinking waters. Chemosphere 45(6):865–873PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Metsämuuronen S, Sillanpää M, Bhatnagar A, Mänttäri M (2014) Natural organic matter removal from drinking water by membrane technology. Sep Purif Rev 43(1):1–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fang J, Yang X, Ma J, Shang C, Zhao Q (2010) Characterization of algal organic matter and formation of DBPs from chlor (am) ination. Water Res 44(20):5897–5906PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gao L, Fan D, Li D, Cai J (2010) Fluorescence characteristics of chromophoric dissolved organic matter in shallow water along the Zhejiang coasts, southeast China. Mar Environ Res 69(3):187–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rosario-Ortiz FL, Snyder SA, Suffet IM (2007) Characterization of dissolved organic matter in drinking water sources impacted by multiple tributaries. Water Res 41(18):4115–4128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mostofa KM, Wu F, Liu C-Q, Fang WL, Yuan J, Ying WL, Wen L, Yi M (2010) Characterization of Nanming river (Southwestern China) sewerage-impacted pollution using an excitation-emission matrix and PARAFAC. Limnology 11(3):217–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Borisover M, Laor Y, Saadi I, Lado M, Bukhanovsky N (2011) Tracing organic footprints from industrial effluent discharge in recalcitrant riverine chromophoric dissolved organic matter. Water Air Soil Pollut 222(1–4):255–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Elliott S, Lead J, Baker A (2006) Characterisation of the fluorescence from freshwater, planktonic bacteria. Water Res 40(10):2075–2083PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Baker A (2001) Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix characterization of some sewage-impacted rivers. Environ Sci Technol 35(5):948–953PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Senesi N, Miano TM, Provenzano MR, Brunetti G (1989) Spectroscopic and compositional comparative characterization of I.H.S.S. reference and standard fulvic and humic acids of various origin. Sci Total Environ 81–2(1):143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhu G, Wang C, Dong X (2017) Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy analysis of landfill leachate DOM in coagulation-flocculation process. Environ Technol 38(12):1489–1497Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stevenson FJ (1982) Humus chemistry. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mobed JJ, Hemmingsen SL, Autry JL, McGown LB (1996) Fluorescence characterization of IHSS humic substances: total luminescence spectra with absorbance correction. Environ Sci Technol 30(10):3061–3065Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Buffle J, Greter FL, Haerdi W (1977) Measurement of complexation properties of humic and fulvic acids in natural waters with lead and copper ion-selective electrodes. Anal Chem 49(2):216–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kowalczuk P, Durako MJ, Young H, Kahn AE, Cooper WJ, Gonsior M (2009) Characterization of dissolved organic matter fluorescence in the South Atlantic Bight with use of PARAFAC model: interannual variability. Mar Chem 113(3):182–196Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yang L, Han DH, Lee BM, Hur J (2015) Characterizing treated wastewaters of different industries using clustered fluorescence EEM–PARAFAC and FT-IR spectroscopy: implications for downstream impact and source identification. Chemosphere 127:222–228Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Shutova Y, Baker A, Bridgeman J, Henderson RK (2014) Spectroscopic characterisation of dissolved organic matter changes in drinking water treatment: from PARAFAC analysis to online monitoring wavelengths. Water Res 54:159–169Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Søndergaard M, Stedmon CA, Borch NH (2004) Fate of terrigenous dissolved organic matter (DOM) in estuaries: aggregation and bioavailability. Ophelia 57(3):161–176Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nimptsch J, Woelfl S, Kronvangb B, Gieseckea R, Gonzáleza HE, Caputoa L, Gelbrechtc J, von Tuemplingd W, Graeberb D (2014) Does filter type and pore size influence spectroscopic analysis of freshwater chromophoric DOM composition? Limnol Ecol Manage Inland Waters 48:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Phong DD, Hur J (2015) Insight into photocatalytic degradation of dissolved organic matter in UVA/TiO2 systems revealed by fluorescence EEM-PARAFAC. Water Res 87:119–126Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Murphy KR, Stedmon CA, Waite TD, Ruiz GM (2008) Distinguishing between terrestrial and autochthonous organic matter sources in marine environments using fluorescence spectroscopy. Mar Chem 108(1):40–58Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yamashita Y, Jaffé R, Maie N, Tanoue E (2008) Assessing the dynamics of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in coastal environments by excitation emission matrix fluorescence and parallel factor analysis (EEM-PARAFAC). Limnol Oceanogr 53(5):1900–1908Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lee S, Hur J (2016) Heterogeneous adsorption behavior of landfill leachate on granular activated carbon revealed by fluorescence excitation emission matrix (EEM)-parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC). Chemosphere 149:41–48Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wang X, Zhang F, Ghulam A, Trumbo AL, Yang J, Ren Y, Jing Y (2017) Evaluation and estimation of surface water quality in an arid region based on EEM-PARAFAC and 3D fluorescence spectral index: a case study of the Ebinur Lake Watershed, China. CATENA 155:62–74Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wang Q-L, Jiang T, Zhao Z, Liang J, Mu Z-J, Wei S-Q, Chen X-S (2016) Spectral characteristics of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in waters typical agricultural watershed of Three Gorges reservoir areas. Environ Sci 37(6):2082–2092Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wu J, Zhang H, Shao LM, He PJ (2012) Fluorescent characteristics and metal binding properties of individual molecular weight fractions in municipal solid waste leachate. Environ Pollut 162:63–71Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gao Z, Guéguen C (2017) Size distribution of absorbing and fluorescing DOM in Beaufort Sea, Canada Basin. Deep sea research part I: oceanographic. Res Pap Hist Med Assoc 121:30–37Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Airado-Rodríguez D, Galeano-Díaz T, Durán-Merás I, Wold JP (2009) Usefulness of fluorescence excitation–emission matrices in combination with PARAFAC, as fingerprints of red wines. J Agric Food Chem 5(57):1711–1720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Shimotori K, Watanabe K, Hama T (2012) Fluorescence characteristics of humic-like fluorescent dissolved organic matter produced by various taxa of marine bacteria. Aquat Microb Ecol 65(3):249–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Dainard PG, Guéguen C (2013) Distribution of PARAFAC modeled CDOM components in the North Pacific ocean, Bering, Chukchi and Beaufort seas. Mar Chem 157:216–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Singh S, D’Sa EJ, Swenson EM (2010) Chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) variability in Barataria Basin using excitation–emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence and parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC). Sci Total Environ 408(16):3211–3222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Walker SA, Amon RM, Stedmon C, Duan S, Louchouarn P (2009) The use of PARAFAC modeling to trace terrestrial dissolved organic matter and fingerprint water masses in coastal Canadian Arctic surface waters. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 114:1470–1478Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Murphy KR, Stedmon CA, Waite TD, Ruiz GM (2008) Distinguishing between terrestrial and autochthonous organic matter sources in marine environments using fluorescence spectroscopy. Mar Chem 108(1):40–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Du Y, Zhang Y, Chen F, Chang Y, Liu Z (2016) Photochemical reactivities of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in a sub-alpine lake revealed by EEM-PARAFAC: an insight into the fate of allochthonous DOM in alpine lakes affected by climate change. Sci Total Environ 568:216–225Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Murphy KR, Ruiz GM, Dunsmuir WT, Waite TD (2006) Optimized parameters for fluorescence-based verification of ballast water exchange by ships. Environ Sci Technol 40(7):2357–2362Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Stedmon CA, Markager S, Tranvik L, Kronberg L, Slätis T, Martinsen W (2007) Photochemical production of ammonium and transformation of dissolved organic matter in the Baltic Sea. Mar Chem 104(3):227–240Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Ruscalleda M, Seredynska-Sobecka B, Ni B-J, Arvin E, Balaguer MD, Colprim J, Smets BF (2014) Spectrometric characterization of the effluent dissolved organic matter from an anammox reactor shows correlation between the EEM signature and anammox growth. Chemosphere 117:271–277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Kothawala DN, von Wachenfeldt E, Koehler B, Tranvik LJ (2012) Selective loss and preservation of lake water dissolved organic matter fluorescence during long-term dark incubations. Sci Total Environ 433:238–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Wang Z, Wu Z, Tang S (2009) Characterization of dissolved organic matter in a submerged membrane bioreactor by using three-dimensional excitation and emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy. Water Res 43(6):1533–1540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Fellman JB, Dogramaci S, Skrzypek G, Dodson W, Grierson PF (2011) Hydrologic control of dissolved organic matter biogeochemistry in pools of a subtropical dryland river. Water Resour Res 47(6):667–671Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Nimptsch J, Woelfl S, Kronvang B, Giesecke R, González HE, Caputo L, Gelbrecht J, von Tuempling W, Graeber D (2014) Does filter type and pore size influence spectroscopic analysis of freshwater chromophoric DOM composition? Limnol Ecol Manage Inland Waters 48:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Chen W, Westerhoff P, Leenheer JA, Booksh K (2003) Fluorescence excitation–emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 37(24):5701–5710PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Bugden J, Yeung C, Kepkay P, Lee K (2008) Application of ultraviolet fluorometry and excitation–emission matrix spectroscopy (EEMS) to fingerprint oil and chemically dispersed oil in seawater. Mar Pollut Bull 56(4):677–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Yang X, Shang C, Lee W, Westerhoff P, Fan C (2008) Correlations between organic matter properties and DBP formation during chloramination. Water Res 42(8):2329–2339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Sanchez NP, Skeriotis AT, Miller CM (2014) A PARAFAC-based long-term assessment of DOM in a multi-coagulant drinking water treatment scheme. Environ Sci Technol 48(3):1582–1591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Burdick D, Xinm T (1989) The wavelength component vectorgram: a tool for resolving two-component fluorescent mixtures. J Chemometrics 2:431–441Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Sanchez NP, Skeriotis AT, Miller CM (2013) Assessment of dissolved organic matter fluorescence PARAFAC components before and after coagulation-filtration in a full scale water treatment plant. Water Res 47(4):1679–1690PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Schlautman MA, Morgan JJ (2002) Binding of a fluorescent hydrophobic organic probe by dissolved humic substances and organically-coated aluminum oxide surfaces. Environ Sci Technol 27(12):2523–2532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Patel-Sorrentino N, Mounier S, Benaim JY (2002) Excitation-emission fluorescence matrix to study pH influence on organic matter fluorescence in the Amazon basin rivers. Water Res 36(10):2571–2581PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Murphy KR, Hambly A, Singh S, Henderson RK, Baker A, Stuetz R, Khan SJ (2011) Organic matter fluorescence in municipal water recycling schemes: toward a unified PARAFAC model. Environ Sci Technol 45(7):2909–2916PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Ahluwalia SS, Goyal D (2007) Microbial and plant derived biomass for removal of heavy metals from wastewater. Bioresour Technol 98(12):2243–2257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Reynolds DM, Ahmad SR (1995) The effect of metal ions on the fluorescence of sewage wastewater. Water Res 29(29):2214–2216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Benn TM, Westerhoff P (2008) Nanoparticle silver released into water from commercially available sock fabrics. Environ Sci Technol 42(11):4133–4139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Pallem VL, Stretz HA, Wells MJM (2009) Evaluating aggregation of gold nanoparticles and humic substances using fluorescence spectroscopy. Environ Sci Technol 43(19): 7531–7535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Manoharan V, Ravindran A, Anjali CH (2014) Mechanistic insights into interaction of humic acid with silver nanoparticles. Cell Biochem Biophys 68(1):127–131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Zhu G, Yin J (2017) Fluorescence quenching of humic acid by coated metallic silver particles. J Fluoresc 27(4):1233–1243Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Manciulea A, Baker A, Lead JR (2009) A fluorescence quenching study of the interaction of Suwannee river fulvic acid with iron oxide nanoparticles. Chemosphere 76(8):1023–1027PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Guo Q, Zhang Z, Ma Z, Liang Y, Liu W (2014) Fluorescence characteristics of natural organic matter in water under sequential exposure to UV irradiation/chlor(am)ination. Water Sci Tech-W Sup 14(1):22–30Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Hong H, Huang F, Wang F, Ding L, Lin H, Liang Y (2013) Properties of sediment NOM collected from a drinking water reservoir in South China, and its association with THMs and HAAs formation. J Hydrol 476:274–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Richardson SD, Thruston AD, Rav-Acha C, Groisman L, Popilevsky I, Juraev O, Glezer V, McKague AB, Plewa MJ, Wagner ED (2003) Tribromopyrrole, brominated acids, and other disinfection byproducts produced by disinfection of drinking water rich in bromide. Environ Sci Technol 37(17):3782–3793PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Wu F, Kothawala D, Evans R, Dillon P, Cai Y (2007) Relationships between DOC concentration, molecular size and fluorescence properties of DOM in a stream. Appl Geochem 22(8):1659–1667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Nakajima F, Hanabusa M, Furumai H (2002) Excitation - emission fluorescence spectra and trihalomethane formation potential in the Tama river, Japan. Water Sci Tech-W Sup 2(5–6):481–486Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Dotson A, Westerhoff P (2009) Occurrence and removal of amino acids during drinking water treatment. J Am Water Works Assoc 101(9):101–115Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Casbeer EM, Sharma VK, Zajickova Z, Dionysiou DD (2013) Kinetics and mechanism of oxidation of tryptophan by ferrate (VI). Environ Sci Technol 47(9):4572–4580PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Chu W, Gao N, Krasner SW, Templeton MR, Yin D (2012) Formation of halogenated C-, N-DBPs from chlor (am) ination and UV irradiation of tyrosine in drinking water. Environ Pollut 161:8–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Chu W, Li D, Gao N, Templeton MR, Tan C, Gao Y (2014) The control of emerging haloacetamide DBP precursors with UV/persulfate treatment. Water Res 72:340–348Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Freuze I, Brosillon S, Herman D, Laplanche A, Démocrate C, Cavard J (2004) Odorous products of the chlorination of phenylalanine in water: formation, evolution, and quantification. Environ Sci Technol 38(15):4134–4139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Fabbricino M, Korshin GV (2004) Probing the mechanisms of NOM chlorination using fluorescence: formation of disinfection by-products in Alento river water. Water Sci Tech-W Sup 4(4):227–233Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Baker A, Inverarity R (2004) Protein-like fluorescence intensity as a possible tool for determining river water quality. Hydrol Process 18(15):2927–2945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Baker A, Curry M (2004) Fluorescence of leachates from three contrasting landfills. Water Res 38(10):2605–2613PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    De Vera GA, Keller J, Gernjak W, Weinberg H, Farré MJ (2016) Biodegradability of DBP precursors after drinking water ozonation. Water Res 106:550–561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Choi J, Valentine RL (2002) Formation of N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) from reaction of monochloramine: a new disinfection by-product. Water Res 36(4):817–824PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Liu C, Tang X, Kim J, Korshin GV (2015) Formation of aldehydes and carboxylic acids in ozonated surface water and wastewater: a clear relationship with fluorescence changes. Chemosphere 125:182–190Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Liu C, Nanaboina V, Korshin G (2012) Spectroscopic study of the degradation of antibiotics and the generation of representative EfOM oxidation products in ozonated wastewater. Chemosphere 86(8):774–782PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Korak JA, Wert EC, Rosario-Ortiz FL (2015) Evaluating fluorescence spectroscopy as a tool to characterize cyanobacteria intracellular organic matter upon simulated release and oxidation in natural water. Water Res 68:432–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Świetlik J, Sikorska E (2004) Application of fluorescence spectroscopy in the studies of natural organic matter fractions reactivity with chlorine dioxide and ozone. Water Res 38(17):3791–3799PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Lyon BA, Cory RM, Weinberg HS (2014) Changes in dissolved organic matter fluorescence and disinfection byproduct formation from UV and subsequent chlorination/chloramination. J Hazard Mater 264:411–419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Yang L, Kim D, Uzun H, Karanfil T, Hur J (2015) Assessing trihalomethanes (THMs) and N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) formation potentials in drinking water treatment plants using fluorescence spectroscopy and parallel factor analysis. Chemosphere 121:84–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Stedmon CA, Markager S (2005) Resolving the variability in dissolved organic matter fluorescence in a temperate estuary and its catchment using PARAFAC analysis. Limnol Oceanogr 50(2):686–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Ma M, Liu R, Liu H, Qu J, Jefferson W (2012) Effects and mechanisms of pre-chlorination on Microcystis aeruginosa removal by alum coagulation: significance of the released intracellular organic matter. Sep Purif Technol 86:19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Henderson RK, Baker A, Parsons SA, Jefferson B (2008) Characterisation of algogenic organic matter extracted from cyanobacteria, green algae and diatoms. Water Res 42(13):3435–3445PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Qu F, Liang H, He J, Ma J, Wang Z, Yu H, Li G (2012) Characterization of dissolved extracellular organic matter (dEOM) and bound extracellular organic matter (bEOM) of Microcystis aeruginosa and their impacts on UF membrane fouling. Water Res 46(9):2881–2890PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Yang X, Guo W, Shen Q (2011) Formation of disinfection byproducts from chlor (am) ination of algal organic matter. J Hazard Mater 197:378–388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Shah AD, Mitch WA (2011) Halonitroalkanes, halonitriles, haloamides, and N-nitrosamines: a critical review of nitrogenous disinfection byproduct formation pathways. Environ Sci Technol 46(1):119–131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Kristiana I, Tan J, Joll CA, Heitz A, Von Gunten U, Charrois JW (2013) Formation of N-nitrosamines from chlorination and chloramination of molecular weight fractions of natural organic matter. Water Res 47(2):535–546PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Padhye LP, Hertzberg B, Yushin G, Huang C-H (2011) N-nitrosamines formation from secondary amines by nitrogen fixation on the surface of activated carbon. Environ Sci Technol 45(19):8368–8376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Richardson SD, Postigo C (2011) Drinking water disinfection by-products. In: Barceló D (ed) Emerging organic contaminants and human health (pp 93–137). The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 20. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Chen M, Jaffé R (2014) Photo-and bio-reactivity patterns of dissolved organic matter from biomass and soil leachates and surface waters in a subtropical wetland. Water Res 61:181–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Wada S, Omori Y, Kayamyo Y, Tashiro Y, Hama T (2015) Photoreactivity of dissolved organic matter from macroalgae. Reg Stud Mar Sci 2:12–18Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Phong DD, Hur J (2015) Insight into photocatalytic degradation of dissolved organic matter in UVA/TiO2 systems revealed by fluorescence EEM-PARAFAC. Water Res 87:119–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Du Y, Zhang Y, Chen F, Chang Y, Liu Z (2016) Photochemical reactivities of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in a sub-alpine lake revealed by EEM-PARAFAC: an insight into the fate of allochthonous DOM in alpine lakes affected by climate change. Sci Total Environ 568:216–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Phong DD, Hur J (2016) Non-catalytic and catalytic degradation of effluent dissolved organic matter under UVA-and UVC-irradiation tracked by advanced spectroscopic tools. Water Res 105:199–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Chen M, Jaffé R (2016) Quantitative assessment of photo-and bio-reactivity of chromophoric and fluorescent dissolved organic matter from biomass and soil leachates and from surface waters in a subtropical wetland. Biogeochemistry 129(3):273–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Yang L, Hur J, Zhuang W (2015) Occurrence and behaviors of fluorescence EEM-PARAFAC components in drinking water and wastewater treatment systems and their applications: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(9):6500–6510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Samsudin EM, Sze NG, Ta YW, Tan TL, Hamid SBA, Joon CJ (2015) Evaluation on the photocatalytic degradation activity of reactive blue 4 using pure anatase nano-TiO2. Sains Malays 44(7):1011–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Zhu G, Zheng H, Zhang Z, Tshukudu T, Zhang P, Xiang X (2011) Characterization and coagulation–flocculation behavior of polymeric aluminum ferric sulfate (PAFS). Chem Eng J 178:50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Zhu G, Zheng H, Chen W, Fan W, Zhang P, Tshukudu T (2012) Preparation of a composite coagulant: polymeric aluminum ferric sulfate (PAFS) for wastewater treatment. Desalination 285:315–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Matilainen A, Vepsäläinen M, Sillanpää M (2010) Natural organic matter removal by coagulation during drinking water treatment: a review. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 159(2):189–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Zheng H, Zhu G, Jiang S, Tshukudu T, Xiang X, Zhang P, He Q (2011) Investigations of coagulation–flocculation process by performance optimization, model prediction and fractal structure of flocs. Desalination 269(1):148–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Antunes MCG, Pereira CC, Da Silva JCE (2007) MCR of the quenching of the EEM of fluorescence of dissolved organic matter by metal ions. Anal Chim Acta 595(1):9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Gone DL, Seidel J-L, Batiot C, Bamory K, Ligban R, Biemi J (2009) Using fluorescence spectroscopy EEM to evaluate the efficiency of organic matter removal during coagulation–flocculation of a tropical surface water (Agbo reservoir). J Hazard Mater 172(2):693–699PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Cheng WP, Chi FH (2002) A study of coagulation mechanisms of polyferric sulfate reacting with humic acid using a fluorescence-quenching method. Water Res 36(18):4583–4591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Matilainen A, Lindqvist N, Korhonen S, Tuhkanen T (2002) Removal of NOM in the different stages of the water treatment process. Environ Int 28(6):457–465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Bagastyo AY, Keller J, Poussade Y, Batstone DJ (2011) Characterisation and removal of recalcitrants in reverse osmosis concentrates from water reclamation plants. Water Res 45(7):2415–2427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Wassink JK, Andrews RC, Peiris RH, Legge RL (2011) Evaluation of fluorescence excitation–emission and LC-OCD as methods of detecting removal of NOM and DBP precursors by enhanced coagulation. Water Sci Tech-W Sup 11(5):621–630Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Bond T, Huang J, Templeton MR, Graham N (2011) Occurrence and control of nitrogenous disinfection by-products in drinking water–a review. Water Res 45(15):4341–4354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Lee W, Westerhoff P, Croué J-P (2007) Dissolved organic nitrogen as a precursor for chloroform, dichloroacetonitrile, N-nitrosodimethylamine, and trichloronitromethane. Environ Sci Technol 41(15):5485–5490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Fan L, Nguyen T, Roddick FA (2011) Characterisation of the impact of coagulation and anaerobic bio-treatment on the removal of chromophores from molasses wastewater. Water Res 45(13):3933–3940PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Karthik M, Dafale N, Pathe P, Nandy T (2008) Biodegradability enhancement of purified terephthalic acid wastewater by coagulation–flocculation process as pretreatment. J Hazard Mater 154(1):721–730PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Liu T, Chen Z-l, Yu W-Z, You S-J (2011) Characterization of organic membrane foulants in a submerged membrane bioreactor with pre-ozonation using three-dimensional excitation–emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy. Water Res 45(5):2111–2121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Shi X, Field R, Hankins N (2011) Review of fouling by mixed feeds in membrane filtration applied to water purification. Desalin Water Treat 35(1–3):68–81Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    Qu F, Liang H, Zhou J, Nan J, Shao S, Zhang J, Li G (2014) Ultrafiltration membrane fouling caused by extracellular organic matter (EOM) from Microcystis aeruginosa: effects of membrane pore size and surface hydrophobicity. J Membr Sci 449:58–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Meng F, Zhou Z, Ni B-J, Zheng X, Huang G, Jia X, Li S, Xiong Y, Kraume M (2011) Characterization of the size-fractionated biomacromolecules: tracking their role and fate in a membrane bioreactor. Water Res 45(15):4661–4671PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Wang Z, Wu Z, Tang S (2009) Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) properties and their effects on membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Res 43(9):2504–2512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Ng TCA, Ng HY (2010) Characterisation of initial fouling in aerobic submerged membrane bioreactors in relation to physico-chemical characteristics under different flux conditions. Water Res 44(7):2336–2348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Nguyen T, Fan L, Roddick F, Harris J (2009) A comparative study of microfiltration and ultrafiltration of activated sludge-lagoon effluent. Desalination 236(1):208–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Peiris BRH, Hallé C, Legge RL, Peldszus S, Jekel M, Huck PM, Haberkamp J, Moresoli C, Budman H, Amy G (2008) Assessing nanofiltration fouling in drinking water treatment using fluorescence fingerprinting and LC-OCD analyses. Water Sci Tech-W Sup 8(4):459–465Google Scholar
  142. 142.
    Her N, Amy G, Yoon J, Song M (2003) Novel methods for characterizing algogenic organic matter and associated nanofiltration membrane fouling. Water Sci Tech-W Sup 3(5–6):165–174Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    Peiris RH, Hallé C, Budman H, Moresoli C, Peldszus S, Huck PM, Legge RL (2010) Identifying fouling events in a membrane-based drinking water treatment process using principal component analysis of fluorescence excitation-emission matrices. Water Res 44(1):185–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Hong S, Aryal R, Vigneswaran S, Johir M, Kandasamy J (2012) Influence of hydraulic retention time on the nature of foulant organics in a high rate membrane bioreactor. Desalination 287:116–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Pramanik BK, Roddick FA, Fan L (2016) Long-term operation of biological activated carbon pre-treatment for microfiltration of secondary effluent: correlation between the organic foulants and fouling potential. Water Res 90:405–414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Kimura K, Tanaka K, Watanabe Y (2014) Microfiltration of different surface waters with/without coagulation: clear correlations between membrane fouling and hydrophilic biopolymers. Water Res 49:434–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Her N, Amy G, Park H-R, Song M (2004) Characterizing algogenic organic matter (AOM) and evaluating associated NF membrane fouling. Water Res 38(6):1427–1438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Kimura K, Hane Y, Watanabe Y, Amy G, Ohkuma N (2004) Irreversible membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of surface water. Water Res 38(14):3431–3441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Linares RV, Yangali-Quintanilla V, Li Z, Amy G (2012) NOM and TEP fouling of a forward osmosis (FO) membrane: foulant identification and cleaning. J Membr Sci 421:217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Ho JS, Sim LN, Webster RD, Viswanath B, Coster HG, Fane AG (2017) Monitoring fouling behavior of reverse osmosis membranes using electrical impedance spectroscopy: a field trial study. Desalination 407:75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Li W-H, Sheng G-P, Liu X-W, Yu H-Q (2008) Characterizing the extracellular and intracellular fluorescent products of activated sludge in a sequencing batch reactor. Water Res 42(12):3173–3181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Ni B-J, Fang F, Xie W-M, Sun M, Sheng G-P, Li W-H, Yu H-Q (2009) Characterization of extracellular polymeric substances produced by mixed microorganisms in activated sludge with gel-permeating chromatography, excitation–emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy measurement and kinetic modeling. Water Res 43(5):1350–1358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Esparza-Soto M, Westerhoff PK (2001) Fluorescence spectroscopy and molecular weight distribution of extracellular polymers from full-scale activated sludge biomass. Water Sci Technol 43(6):87–95PubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Sheng G-P, Yu H-Q (2006) Characterization of extracellular polymeric substances of aerobic and anaerobic sludge using three-dimensional excitation and emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy. Water Res 40(6):1233–1239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guocheng Zhu
    • 1
  • Yongning Bian
    • 1
  • Andrew S. Hursthouse
    • 1
    • 2
  • Peng Wan
    • 3
  • Katarzyna Szymanska
    • 2
    • 4
  • Jiangya Ma
    • 5
  • Xiaofeng Wang
    • 3
  • Zilong Zhao
    • 6
  1. 1.Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Shale Gas Resource UtilizationHunan University of Science and TechnologyXiangtanChina
  2. 2.Institute of Biomedical & Environmental Health Research, School of Science & SportUniversity of the West of ScotlandPaisleyUK
  3. 3.Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  4. 4.Hydroklear Services Ltd, Paddockholm Industrial EstateKilbirnieUK
  5. 5.School of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureAnhui University of TechnologyMaanshanChina
  6. 6.School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Graduate SchoolHarbin Institute of Technology ShenzhenShenzhenChina

Personalised recommendations