Advertisement

Journal of Fluorescence

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 963–975 | Cite as

Single Molecule 3D Orientation in Time and Space: A 6D Dynamic Study on Fluorescently Labeled Lipid Membranes

  • Richard Börner
  • Nicky Ehrlich
  • Johannes Hohlbein
  • Christian G. Hübner
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Interactions between single molecules profoundly depend on their mutual three-dimensional orientation. Recently, we demonstrated a technique that allows for orientation determination of single dipole emitters using a polarization-resolved distribution of fluorescence into several detection channels. As the method is based on the detection of single photons, it additionally allows for performing fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) as well as dynamical anisotropy measurements thereby providing access to fast orientational dynamics down to the nanosecond time scale. The 3D orientation is particularly interesting in non-isotropic environments such as lipid membranes, which are of great importance in biology. We used giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) labeled with fluorescent dyes down to a single molecule concentration as a model system for both, assessing the robustness of the orientation determination at different timescales and quantifying the associated errors. The vesicles provide a well-defined spherical surface, such that the use of fluorescent lipid dyes (DiO) allows to establish a a wide range of dipole orientations experimentally. To complement our experimental data, we performed Monte Carlo simulations of the rotational dynamics of dipoles incorporated into lipid membranes. Our study offers a comprehensive view on the dye orientation behavior in a lipid membrane with high spatiotemporal resolution representing a six-dimensional fluorescence detection approach.

Keywords

Single molecule Fluorescence microscopy 3D dipole orientation Confocal microscopy GUV Anisotropy FCS 

Notes

Funding and Acknowledgement

The Volkswagen Stiftung (AZ I/83 019 to CGH), a Marie Curie Career Integration Grant (#630992 to JH) and the Forschungskredit grant of the University Zurich (FK-14-096, to RB) are gratefully acknowledged for financial support. We thank Henning Seidel for the implementation of the 3D sectioning scanning in the Labview based setup control software of our home-built SCOM and Sebastian L.B. König, University of Zurich, for proofreading the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: RB NE JH CGH. Performed the experiments: RB. Analyzed the data: RB. Contributed reagents/materials: RB NE. Wrote the paper: RB JH NE CGH. Derived mathematical descriptions: RB. Designed and programmed software: RB JH.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10895_2016_1784_MOESM1_ESM.doc (1.5 mb)
ESM 1 (DOC 1539 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Ohmachi M, Komori Y, Iwane AH, Fujii F, Jin T, Yanagida T (2012) Fluorescence microscopy for simultaneous observation of 3D orientation and movement and its application to quantum rod-tagged myosin V. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(14):5294–5298. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118472109 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Toprak E, Enderlein J, Syed S, McKinney SA, Petschek RG, Ha T, Goldman YE, Selvin PR (2006) Defocused orientation and position imaging (DOPI) of myosin V. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(17):6495–6499. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507134103 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Forkey JN, Quinlan ME, Shaw MA, Corrie JE, Goldman YE (2003) Three-dimensional structural dynamics of myosin V by single-molecule fluorescence polarization. Nature 422(6930):399–404. doi: 10.1038/nature01529 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Adachi K, Yasuda R, Noji H, Itoh H, Harada Y, Yoshida M, Kinosita K Jr (2000) Stepping rotation of F1-ATPase visualized through angle-resolved single-fluorophore imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97(13):7243–7247. doi: 10.1073/pnas.120174297 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    MacDonald D, Lu P (2002) Residual dipolar couplings in nucleic acid structure determination. Curr Opin Struct Biol 12(3):337–343. doi: 10.1016/S0959-440X(02)00328-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hohlbein J, Gryte K, Heilemann M, Kapanidis AN (2010) Surfing on a new wave of single-molecule fluorescence methods. Phys Biol 7(3):031001. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/7/3/031001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moerner WE (2007) New directions in single-molecule imaging and analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(31):12596–12602. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610081104 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ha T, Enderle T, Chemla S, Selvin R, Weiss S (1996) Single molecule dynamics studied by polarization modulation. Phys Rev Lett 77(19):3979–3982. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3979 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lieb MA, Zavislan JM, Novotny L (2004) Single-molecule orientations determined by direct emission pattern imaging. J Opt Soc Am B 21(6):1210–1215. doi: 10.1364/JOSAB.21.001210 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Böhmer M, Enderlein J (2003) Orientation imaging of single molecules by wide-field epifluorescence microscopy. J Opt Soc Am B 20(3):554–559. doi: 10.1364/JOSAB.20.000554 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Debarre A, Jaffiol R, Julien C, Nutarelli D, Richard A, Tchenio P, Chaput F, Boilot JP (2004) Quantitative determination of the 3D dipole orientation of single molecules. Eur Phys J D 28(1):67–77. doi: 10.1140/epjd/e2003-00295-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bartko AP, Dickson RM (1999) Three-dimensional orientations of polymer-bound single molecules. J Phys Chem B 103(16):3053–3056. doi: 10.1021/jp9846330 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Backer AS, Backlund MP, Lew MD, Moerner WE (2013) Single-molecule orientation measurements with a quadrated pupil. Opt Lett 38(9):1521–1523. doi: 10.1364/OL.38.001521 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ferrand P, Gasecka P, Kress A, Wang X, Bioud FZ, Duboisset J, Brasselet S (2014) Ultimate use of two-photon fluorescence microscopy to map orientational behavior of fluorophores. Biophys J 106(11):2330–2339. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.04.011 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Betzig E, Chichester RJ (1993) Single molecules observed by near-field scanning optical microscopy. Science 262(5138):1422–1425. doi: 10.1126/science.262.5138.1422 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jasny J, Sepioł J (1997) Single molecules observed by immersion mirror objective. A novel method of finding the orientation of a radiating dipole. Chem Phys Lett 273(5–6):439–443. doi: 10.1016/s0009-2614(97)00621-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Empedocles SA, Neuhauser R, Bawendi MG (1999) Three-dimensional orientation measurements of symmetric single chromophores using polarization microscopy. Nature 399(6732):126–130. doi: 10.1038/20138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Prummer M, Sick B, Hecht B, Wild UP (2003) Three-dimensional optical polarization tomography of single molecules. J Chem Phys 118(21):9824–9829. doi: 10.1063/1.1569848 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hohlbein J, Hübner CG (2005) Simple scheme for rapid three-dimensional orientation determination of the emission dipole of single molecules. Appl Phys Lett 86(12):121104. doi: 10.1063/1.1888040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lu CY, Vanden Bout DA (2008) Analysis of orientational dynamics of single fluorophore trajectories from three-angle polarization experiments. J Chem Phys 128(24):244501. doi: 10.1063/1.2937730 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Börner R, Kowerko D, Krause S, von Borczyskowski C, Hübner CG (2012) Efficient simultaneous fluorescence orientation, spectrum, and lifetime detection for single molecule dynamics. J Chem Phys 137(16):164202. doi: 10.1063/1.4759108 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lethiec C, Laverdant J, Vallon H, Javaux C, Dubertret B, Frigerio J-M, Schwob C, Coolen L, Maître A (2014) Measurement of three-dimensional dipole orientation of a single fluorescent nanoemitter by emission polarization analysis. Phys Rev X 4(2):021037. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.4.021037 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Backlund MP, Lew MD, Backer AS, Sahl SJ, Grover G, Agrawal A, Piestun R, Moerner WE (2012) Simultaneous, accurate measurement of the 3D position and orientation of single molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(47):19087–19092. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1216687109 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Krause S, Kowerko D, Börner R, Hübner CG, von Borczyskowski C (2011) Spectral diffusion of single molecules in a hierarchical energy landscape. ChemPhysChem: Eur J Chem Phys Phys Chem 12(2):303–312. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201000678 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Haluska CK, Schroder AP, Didier P, Heissler D, Duportail G, Mely Y, Marques CM (2008) Combining fluorescence lifetime and polarization microscopy to discriminate phase separated domains in giant unilamellar vesicles. Biophys J 95(12):5737–5747. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.108.131490 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Axelrod D (1979) Carbocyanine dye orientation in red cell membrane studied by microscopic fluorescence polarization. Biophys J 26(3):557–573. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(79)85271-6
  27. 27.
    Ehrlich N, Christensen AL, Stamou D (2011) Fluorescence anisotropy based single liposome assay to measure molecule-membrane interactions. Anal Chem 83(21):8169–8176. doi: 10.1021/ac2017234 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gullapalli RR, Demirel MC, Butler PJ (2008) Molecular dynamics simulations of DiI-C18(3) in a DPPC lipid bilayer. Phys Chem Chem Phys 10(24):3548–3560. doi: 10.1039/b716979e CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ariola FS, Mudaliar DJ, Walvick RP, Heikal AA (2006) Dynamics imaging of lipid phases and lipid-marker interactions in model biomembranes. Phys Chem Chem Phys 8(39):4517–4529. doi: 10.1039/b608629b CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Krishna MM, Srivastava A, Periasamy N (2001) Rotational dynamics of surface probes in lipid vesicles. Biophys Chem 90(2):123–133. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4622(01)00137-5
  31. 31.
    Timr S, Bondar A, Cwiklik L, Stefl M, Hof M, Vazdar M, Lazar J, Jungwirth P (2014) Accurate determination of the orientational distribution of a fluorescent molecule in a phospholipid membrane. J Phys Chem B 118(4):855–863. doi: 10.1021/jp4067026 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Riske KA, Dimova R (2005) Electro-deformation and poration of giant vesicles viewed with high temporal resolution. Biophys J 88(2):1143–1155. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.104.050310 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    See supplementary material at [URL will be inserted by Journal of Fluorescence] for additional supporting materialGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bagatolli LA, Parasassi T, Gratton E (2000) Giant phospholipid vesicles: comparison among the whole lipid sample characteristics using different preparation methods: a two photon fluorescence microscopy study. Chem Phys Lipids 105(2):135–147. doi: 10.1016/S0009-3084(00)00118-3
  35. 35.
    Estes DJ, Mayer M (2005) Giant liposomes in physiological buffer using electroformation in a flow chamber. Biochim Biophys Acta 1712(2):152–160. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2005.03.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kucerka N, Tristram-Nagle S, Nagle JF (2005) Structure of fully hydrated fluid phase lipid bilayers with monounsaturated chains. J Membr Biol 208(3):193–202. doi: 10.1007/s00232-005-7006-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lohse B, Bolinger PY, Stamou D (2008) Encapsulation efficiency measured on single small unilamellar vesicles. J Am Chem Soc 130(44):14372–14373. doi: 10.1021/ja805030w CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Åkesson A, Lundgaard CV, Ehrlich N, Pomorski TG, Stamou D, Cárdenas M (2012) Induced dye leakage by PAMAM G6 does not imply dendrimer entry into vesicle lumen. Soft Matter 8(34):8972. doi: 10.1039/c2sm25864a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hohlbein J, Hübner CG (2008) Three-dimensional orientation determination of the emission dipoles of single molecules: the shot-noise limit. J Chem Phys 129(9):094703. doi: 10.1063/1.2971183 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Börner R, Kowerko D, von Borczyskowski C, Hübner CG (2011) Time resolved 3D orientation spectroscopy: experimental realization and simulation. In: Enderlein J, Gryczynski ZK, Erdmann R (eds) Single molecule spectroscopy and imaging IV. SPIE, RichardsFiles/Boerner2011.pdf, p 79050D. doi: 10.1117/12.874897
  41. 41.
    Fourkas JT (2001) Rapid determination of the three-dimensional orientation of single molecules. Opt Lett 26(4):211–213. doi: 10.1364/OL.26.000211
  42. 42.
    Valeur B (2002) Molecular fluorescence principles and applications. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbHGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kapusta P, Erdmann R, Ortmann U, Wahl M (2003) Time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy measurements made simple. J Fluoresc 13(2):179–183. doi: 10.1023/a:1022995327718 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lakowicz JR (2006) Principles of fluorescence spectroscopy, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 797–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Magde D, Elson E, Webb WW (1972) Thermodynamic fluctuations in a reacting system - measurement by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Phys Rev Lett 29(11):705. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.29.705 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Böhmer M, Enderlein J (2003) Fluorescence spectroscopy of single molecules under ambient conditions: methodology and technology. ChemPhysChem 4(8):793–808. doi: 10.1002/cphc.200200565
  47. 47.
    Widengren J, Schwille P (2000) Characterization of photoinduced isomerization and back-isomerization of the cyanine Dye Cy5 by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. J Phys Chem A 104(27):6416–6428. doi: 10.1021/jp000059s CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Korlach J, Schwille P, Webb WW, Feigenson GW (1999) Characterization of lipid bilayer phases by confocal microscopy and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96(15):8461–8466. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.15.8461
  49. 49.
    Schwille P, Haupts U, Maiti S, Webb WW (1999) Molecular dynamics in living cells observed by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy with one- and two-photon excitation. Biophys J 77(4):2251–2265. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77065-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hac AE, Seeger HM, Fidorra M, Heimburg T (2005) Diffusion in two-component lipid membranes--a fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and monte carlo simulation study. Biophys J 88(1):317–333. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.104.040444 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ruttinger S, Buschmann V, Kramer B, Erdmann R, Macdonald R, Koberling F (2008) Comparison and accuracy of methods to determine the confocal volume for quantitative fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. J Microsc 232(2):343–352. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2008.02105.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Pieper CM, Enderlein J (2011) Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy as a tool for measuring the rotational diffusion of macromolecules. Chem Phys Lett 516(1–3):1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2011.06.091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wu Y, Stefl M, Olzynska A, Hof M, Yahioglu G, Yip P, Casey DR, Ces O, Humpolickova J, Kuimova MK (2013) Molecular rheometry: direct determination of viscosity in Lo and Ld lipid phases via fluorescence lifetime imaging. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15(36):14986–14993. doi: 10.1039/c3cp51953h CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Krishna MMG, Periasamy N (1998) Fluorescence of organic dyes in lipid membranes: site of solubilization and effects of viscosity and refractive index on lifetimes. J Fluoresc 8(1):81–91. doi: 10.1007/bf02758241 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Börner
    • 1
  • Nicky Ehrlich
    • 2
  • Johannes Hohlbein
    • 3
    • 5
  • Christian G. Hübner
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Bionanotechnology and Nanomedicine LaboratoryUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  3. 3.Laboratory of BiophysicsWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Institute of PhysicsUniversity of LübeckLübeckGermany
  5. 5.Microspectroscopy CentreWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations