Advertisement

Journal of Fusion Energy

, Volume 35, Issue 5, pp 769–775 | Cite as

Modeling of Heat Fluxes in Edge Plasma of Small Size Divertor Tokamak

  • A. H. Bekheit
Original Research
  • 121 Downloads

Abstract

The heat flows out from the tokamak core region are collected on the divertor plates and external wall. Control of heat flux exhaust in the SOL and divertor plates regions is one of the important issues in tokamak physics. There are important phenomena affecting heat flows were simulated. The simulation is based on the B2SOLPS5.0 2D multifluid code. It is demonstrated that, the following results: (1) The simulation shows that, the operation of small size divertor tokamak, the divertor plate with/without impurities influence on profiles of electron, ion temperatures, and heat loads significantly. (2) Under normal direction of parallel (toroidal) magnetic field and different values of edge plasma density, strong “SOL” heat flow exists directed towards the LFS (outer) plate. (3) The simulation results show that, the increasing of the plasma density strong influence on the ion and electron poloidal heat fluxes profile significantly. The ion and electron polodial heat flux increase by factor “~8” and “2.4” times. (4) The simulation results show that the in–out asymmetry of heat fluxes was reversed when switching on/off E × B drifts in the edge plasma of this tokamak. (5) The simulation results show correlation between the in–out asymmetry divertor heat fluxes and E × B drift velocity. (6) The observed heat loads asymmetry between HFS and LFS plates can be explained with the radial electric field in SOL. (7) Also the simulation results performed result in, the in–out asymmetry strong influence on the characteristic length of ion poloidal heat flux.

Keywords

Heat flux ITB B2SOLPS5.02D 

References

  1. 1.
    L. Costanzo et al (2001) 28th EPS conference on Contr. Fusion and plasma physics. Funchal 25A: 197–200Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Y. Chen, S. Liu, Fusion Eng. Des. 85, 1728–1731 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. Rozhansky et al., Nucl. Fusion 41, 387 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A.H. Bekheit, Fusion Energy 27, 338–345 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. Rozhansky et al., Nucl. Fusion 52, 103017 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Plasma and Nuclear Fusion DepartmentNuclear Research Centre, Atomic Energy AuthorityCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations