Advertisement

The Journal of Ethics

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 341–354 | Cite as

The Burdens of Love

  • Amelie Rorty
Article

Abstract

While we primarily love individual persons, we also love our work, our homes, our activities and causes. To love is to be engaged in an active concern for the objective well-being—the thriving—of whom and what we love. True love mandates discovering in what that well-being consists and to be engaged in the details of promoting it. Since our loves are diverse, we are often conflicted about the priorities among the obligations they bring. Loving requires constant contextual improvisatory adjustment of priorities among our commitments. Besides delighting in—and being enhanced by—the presence and existence of another person (a place, an institution, profession), love requires extended reflection and work.

Keywords

Ambivolence Choice Commitment Conflicts Love Priorities 

References

  1. Anscombe, Elizabeth. 1957. Intention. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Augustine. 1950. The City of God XIV.7. trans. Marcus Dods, 448–449. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  3. Augustine. 2002. On the Trinity IX. 2–5, 8, ed. Gareth Matthews, trans. Stephen McKenna, 25–31, 34–35. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Aquila, Richard E. 1975. Causes and constituents of occurent emotions. The Philosophical Quarterly 25: 346–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Badhwar, Neera. 2003. Love. In Practical ethics, ed. H. LaFollette, 42–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bagley, Benjamin. 2015. Loving someone in particular. Ethics 125(2): 477–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowlby, John. 1969/1999. Attachment and loss (vol. 1) (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Butler, Joseph. Sermon IX.Google Scholar
  9. Emerson, Ralph Waldo. 1841. Love. Essays: First Series. Google Scholar
  10. Frankfurt, Harry. 2001. The dear self. Philosophers Imprint 1(5): 55–78.Google Scholar
  11. Freud, Sigmund. 1947. Contributions to the psychology of love. Freud on war, sex and neurosis, 231. New York: Arts and Science Press.Google Scholar
  12. Geertz, Clifford, Richard Shweder and Robert Levy. 1984. From the native's point of view. In Culture theory, ed. Richard Shweder and Robert LeVine, 123–136. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  13. Haslanger, Sally. 2012. Resisting reality: Social construction and social critique. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Held, Virginia. 2006. The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hume, David. Treatise of the human understanding 2.2.9 SB 384-5.Google Scholar
  16. Jollimore, Troy. 2011. Love’s vision. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kant. 1963. Friendship. In Lectures on Ethics, ed. Louis Beck, trans. Louis Infield, 200-209. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  18. Kant. 1996. Metaphysics of morals, II, 1.1. 25–30. trans. Mary Gregor, (6:449–6:452) 199–201. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kolodny, Nico. 2003. Love as valuing a relationship. The Philosophical Review 11: 135–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kraut, Robert. 1986. Love De Re. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 10: 413–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rorty, Amelie. 1986a. The historicity of love: Love is not love when it alters not when it alteration finds. Midwest Studies in the Philosophy of Mind 10: 121–134. (reprinted in Mind in Action Boston: Beacon Press, 1988/1991 121–135).Google Scholar
  22. Rorty, Amelie. (1986b). The historicity of psychological attitudes: Love is not love which alters not when it alteration finds. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 10: 399–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rorty, Amelie. 1998. On being rational. Ratio 22: 350–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rosaldo, Renato. 1986. From the door to his tent. In Writing culture, ed. James Clifford, and George Marcus. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Setiya, Kieran. 2014. Love and the value of a life. The Philosophical Review 123: 251–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stocker, Michael. 1976. The schizophrenia of modern ethical theories. The Journal of Philosophy 73: 453–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stocker, Michael. 1979. On desiring the bad: An essay in moral psychology. The Journal of Philosophy 86: 46–83.Google Scholar
  28. Strachey, James. ed. & trans. 1959. Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  29. Thalberg, Irving. 1993. Constituents and causes of emotion and action. The Philosophical Quarterly 23: 137–149. Google Scholar
  30. Velleman, David. 1999. Love as a moral emotion. Ethics 109(2): 338–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tufts UniversityMedfordUSA
  2. 2.Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations