Advertisement

The Journal of Ethics

, Volume 17, Issue 1–2, pp 5–35 | Cite as

Causing People to Exist and Saving People’s Lives

  • Jeff McMahan
Article

Abstract

Most people are skeptical of the claim that the expectation that a person would have a life that would be well worth living provides a reason to cause that person to exist. In this essay I argue that to cause such a person to exist would be to confer a benefit of a noncomparative kind and that there is a moral reason to bestow benefits of this kind. But this conclusion raises many problems, among which is that it must be determined how the benefits conferred on people by causing them to exist weigh against comparable benefits conferred on existing people. In particular, might the reason to cause people to exist ever outweigh the reason to save the lives of existing people?

Keywords

The asymmetry Benefit Future people Harm The No-Difference View The Non-Identity Problem Possible people 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I am extremely grateful to Todd May, Melinda Roberts, Yu-Ting Su, Victor Tadros, and Rivka Weinberg for generous written comments on an earlier draft of this essay. I owe an even greater debt to Derek Parfit, who not only gave me two sets of detailed and illuminating written comments but also discussed them with me at length.

References

  1. Benatar, D. 2006. Better never to have been: The harm of coming into existence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, R. 2009. The fallacy of the principle of procreative beneficence. Bioethics 23: 265–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackorby, C., W. Bossert, and D. Donaldson. 1997. Critical-level utilitarianism and the population-ethics dilemma. Economics and Philosophy 13: 197–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dworkin, R. 1993. Life’s dominion. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  5. Glover, J. 1977. Causing death and saving lives. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  6. Hanser, M. 1990. Harming future people. Philosophy & Public Affairs 19(1990): 47–70.Google Scholar
  7. Harman, E. 2004. Can we harm and benefit in creating? Philosophical Perspectives 18: 89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harman, E. 2009. Harming as causing harm. In Harming future persons: Ethics, genetics and the nonidentity problem, ed. M. Roberts, and D. Wasserman, 137–154. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heyd, D. 1992. Genethics: Moral issues in the creation of new people. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Kamm, F.M. 1992. Creation and abortion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. McMahan, J. 1981. Problems of population theory. Ethics 92: 96–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McMahan, J. 1982. The end of the future. London Review of Books, July 1.Google Scholar
  13. McMahan, J. 1998. Wrongful life: Paradoxes in the morality of causing people to exist. In Rational commitment and social justice: Essays for Gregory Kavka, ed. J. Coleman, and C. Morris, 208–247. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McMahan, J. 2002. The ethics of killing: Problems at the margins of life. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McMahan, J. 2005. Preventing the existence of people with disabilities. In Quality of life and human difference: Genetic testing, health care, and disability, ed. D. Wasserman, J. Bickenbach, and R. Wachbroit, 142–171. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McMahan, J. 2009. Asymmetries in the morality of causing people to exist. In Harming future persons: Ethics, genetics and the nonidentity problem, ed. M. Roberts, and D. Wasserman, 49–68. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Parfit, D. 1982. Future generations: Further problems. Philosophy & Public Affairs 11: 113–172.Google Scholar
  18. Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Parfit, D. 2011. On what matters, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Roberts, M.A. 1998. Child versus childmaker. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  21. Roberts, M.A. 2009. The nonidentity problem and the two envelope problem: When is one act better for a person than another? In Harming future persons: Ethics, genetics and the nonidentity problem, ed. M. Roberts, and D. Wasserman, 201–228. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Roberts, M.A. 2010. Abortion and the significance of merely possible persons. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shiffrin, S. 1999. Wrongful life, procreative responsibility, and the significance of harm. Legal Theory 5: 117–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations