Application of a two-layer model of turbulence in calculation of a boundary layer with a pressure gradient

  • K. N. Volkov


The characteristic features of the formulation of a two-layer turbulence model and its application in calculation of near-wall turbulent flows are considered. Factors that influence the effectiveness of implementation of the model and ways of expanding the limits of its applicability are discussed. The possibilities of the two-layer model are demonstrated by calculating a boundary layer on a flat plate with a longitudinal pressure gradient. A comparison of the results of calculation of the heat-transfer characteristics by the two-layer model, two-parameter dissipation model, and Spalart-Allmaras model with the data of a physical experiment and available correlations is made.


Nusselt Number Turbulence Model Plate Surface Local Nusselt Number Turbulent Viscosity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    E. P. A. Libby and F. A. Williams (Eds.), Turbulent Reacting Flows, Academic Press, New York (1994).MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. A. Belov and S. A. Isaev, Modeling of Turbulent Flows [in Russian], Izd. BGTU, St. Petersburg (2001).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. R. Spalart and S. R. Allmaras, A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows, AIAA Paper, No. 92-0439 (1992).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Deck, P. Duveau, P. d’Espiney, and P. Guillen, Development and application of Spalart-Allmaras one-equation turbulence model to three-dimensional supersonic complex configurations, Aerospace Sci. Technol., 6, 171–183 (2002).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. C. Wilcox, Dilatation-dissipation corrections for advanced turbulence models, AIAA J., 30, 2639–2646 (1992).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. E. Launder and D. B. Spalding, The numerical computation of turbulent flows, Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 3, 269–289 (1974).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Kato and B. E. Launder, The modelling of turbulent flow around stationary and vibrating square cylinders, in: Proc. 9th Symp. on Turbulent Shear Flows, 16–18 August 1993, Kyoto, Japan (1993), Vol. 9, pp. 10.4.1–10.4.6.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. A. Leschziner and W. Rodi, Calculation of annular and twin parallel jets using various discretization schemes and turbulent-model variations, ASME J. Fluid Eng., 103, 353–360 (1981).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Ch. Bonnin, T. Buchal, and W. Rodi, ERCOFTAC workshop on data bases and testing of calculation methods for turbulent flows, ERCOFTAC Bulletin, No. 28, 48–54 (1996).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Wolfshtein, The velocity and temperature distribution of one-dimensional flow with turbulence augmentation and pressure gradient, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 12, 301–318 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. N. Norris and W. C. Reynolds, Turbulent channel flow with a moving wavy boundary, Report of Stanford University, No. FM-10 (1975).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. Rodi, Experience with two-layer models combining the k-ε model with one-equation model near a wall, AIAA Paper, No. 91-0216 (1991).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. C. Chen and V. C. Patel, Near-wall turbulence models for complex flows including separation, AIAA J., 26, No. 6, 641–648 (1988).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    W. Rodi, N. N. Mansour, and V. Michelassi, One-equation near-wall turbulence modeling with the aid of direct simulation data, J. Fluids Eng., 115, 196–205 (1993).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Jaeger and G. Dhatt, An extended k-ε finite element model, Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids, 14, 1325–1345 (1992).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    T. Jongen and Y. P. Marx, Design of an unconditionally stable, positive scheme for the k-ε and two-layer turbulence models, Computers Fluids, 26, No. 5, 469–485 (1997).MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. Guezengar, J. Francescatto, H. Guillard, and J.-P. Dussauge, Variations on a k-ε turbulence model for supersonic boundary layer computations, Eur. J. Mech. B/Fluids, 18, 713–738 (1999).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    V. K. Garg, Heat transfer research on gas turbine airfoils at NASA GRC, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 23, 109–136 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. J. H. Teekaram, C. J. P. Forth, and T. V. Jones, Film cooling in the presence of mainstream pressure gradients, ASME J. Turbomachinery, 113, 484–492 (1991).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    K. N. Volkov, Use of the control-volume method for solving problems of liquid and gas mechanics on unstructured grids, Vychisl. Metody Programmir., 6, No. 1, 43–60 (2005).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    K. N. Volkov, Discretization of convective flows in the Navier-Stokes equations on the basis of high-resolution difference schemes, Vychisl. Metody Programmir., 5, No. 1, 129–145 (2004).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    R. A. Seban and L. H. Back, Effectiveness and heat transfer for a turbulent boundary layer with tangential injection and variable freestream velocity, ASME J. Heat Transfer, 84, 229–238 (1973).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    H. Hay, D. Lampard, and C. L. Saluja, Effects of the condition of the approach boundary layer and of mainstream pressure gradient on the heat transfer coefficient on film-cooled surfaces, ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 107, 99–112 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    W. M. Kays and M. E. Crawford, Convective Heat and Mass Transfer, McGraw-Hill, New York (1980).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. N. Volkov
    • 1
  1. 1.D. F. Ustinov Baltic State Technical University “Voenmekh”St. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations