Advertisement

The Journal of Economic Inequality

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 463–473 | Cite as

An alternative test of Kuznets’ hypothesis

  • Luis Angeles
Article

Abstract

This paper uses a novel approach for testing Kuznets’ hypothesis. Following Kuznets’ original insights, we test for an inverted U relationship between employment outside agriculture and income inequality, instead of the traditional focus on GDP per capita and income inequality. Our results, obtained using panel and country by country regressions, do not support Kuznets’ hypothesis.

Keywords

Kuznets’ hypothesis Kuznets’ curve Economic development and inequality Rural–urban migration Employment in agriculture 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anand, S., Kanbur, S.M.R.: The Kuznets process and the inequality-development relationship. J. Dev. Econ. 40, 25–52 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Angeles, L.: A Proper Farewell to Kuznets’ Hypothesis. Department of Economics, University of Glasgow, Discussion Paper 2007–15 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Atkinson, T., Brandolini, A.: Promise and pitfalls in the use of ‘secondary data sets’: income inequality in OCED countries as a case study. J. Econ. Lit. 39, 771–799 (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barro, R.J.: Inequality and growth in a panel of countries. J. Econ. Growth 5(1), 5–32 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deininger, K., Squire, L.: Measuring income inequality: a new data base. The World Bank Economic Review 10, 565–591 (1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deininger, K., Squire, L.: New ways of looking at old issues: inequality and growth. J. Dev. Econ. 57, 259–287 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fields, G.S.: Growth and income distribution. In: Psacharopoulos, G. (ed.) Essays on Poverty, Equity and Growth. Pergamon, Oxford (1991)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fields, G.S.: Distribution and Development. MIT, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frazer, G.: Inequality and development across and within countries. World Dev. 34(9), 1459–1481 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Higgins, M., Williamson, J.G.: Explaining inequality the world round: cohort size, Kuznets curves and openness, NBER Working Paper N. 7224 (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kuznets, S.: Economic growth and income inequality. Am. Econ. Rev. 45(1), 1–28 (1955)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li, H., Squire, L., Zou, H.: Explaining international and intertemporal variations in income inequality. Econ. J. 108, 26–43 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Matyas, L., Konya, L., Macquarie, L.: The Kuznets U-curve hypothesis: some panel data evidence. Appl. Econ. Lett. 5, 693–697 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Robinson, S.: A note on the U hypothesis relating income inequality and economic development. Am. Econ. Rev. 66, 437–440 (1976)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations