The Journal of Economic Inequality

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 29–54 | Cite as

Informatization, voter turnout and income inequality

  • Ryo Arawatari
Open Access


In recent years, voter turnout has been decreasing in most industrial countries, and about 40% of all electors abstain from voting. This may affect income inequality and the GDP growth rate through a redistribution policy determined by majority voting. In this paper, we explore the reasons for this continuing decrease in voter turnout and assess its social costs. We conclude that informatization lowers voter turnout by generating an information overload, and that a decrease in voter turnout lowers GDP growth by limiting income redistribution.


Income inequality Information Informatization Voter turnout Voting 

JEL Classification

D31 O15 O41 P16 


  1. 1.
    Aldrich, J.: Rational choice and turnout. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 37, 246–278 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alesina, A., Rodrik, D.: Distributive politics and economic growth. Q. J. Econ. 109, 465–490 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benabou, R.: Unequal societies: income distribution and the social contract. Am. Econ. Rev. 90, 96–129 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cavanagh, T.: Changes in american voter turnout, 1964–1976. Polit. Sci. Q. 96, 53–65 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chong, A., Olivera, M.: On compusory voting and income inequality in a cross-section of countries. Inter-American Development Bank Working Paper, 533 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Crain, M., Deaton, T.: A note on political participation as consumption behaviort. Public Choice 32, 131–135 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Downs, A.: An Economic Theory of Democracy. HarperCollins, New York (1957)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feddersen, T., Pesendorfer, W.: The swing voter’s curse. Am. Econ. Rev. 86, 408–424 (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feddersen, T., Pesendorfer, W.: Abstention in elections with asymmetric information and diverse preferences. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 93, 381–398 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Filer, J., Kenny, L., Morton, R.: Redistribution, income, and voting. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 37, 63–87 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fiorina, M.: The voting decision: instrumental and expressive aspects. J. Polit. 38, 390–413 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gentzkow, M.: Television and voter turnout. Q. J. Econ. 121, 931–972 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ghirardato, P., Katz, J.: Indecision theory: quality of information and voting behavior. California Institute of Technology Social Science Working Papers, 1106 (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hinich, M.: Voting as an act of contribution. Public Choice 36, 135–140 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jinwon, H., Tang, R.: Towards an optilmal resolution to information overload: an infomediary approach. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2001 International Conference on Supporting Group Work, Boulder, 2001Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kanazawa, S.: A possible solution to the paradox of voter turnout. J. Polit. 60, 974–995 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lassen, D.: The effect of information on voter turnout: evidence from a natural experiment. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 49, 103–118 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li, H., Zou, H.: Income inequality is not harmful for growth: theory and evidence. Rev. Dev. Econ. 2, 318–334 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lohmann, S.: A signaling model of informative and manipulative political action. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 87, 319–333 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lohmann, S.: Information aggregation through costly political action. Am. Econ. Rev. 84, 518–530 (1994)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lucas, R.: On the mechanics of economic development. J. Monet. Econ. 22, 3–42 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lupia, A.: Busy voters, agenda control, and the power of information. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 86, 390–403 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lupia, A., McCubbins, M.: The democratic dilemma. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mueller, D., Stratmann, T.: The economic effects of democratic participation. J. Public Econ. 87, 2129–2155 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nardulli, J., Dalager, J., Greco, D.: Voter turnout in U.S. presidential elections: an historical view and some speculation. PS Polit. Sci. Polit. 29, 480–490 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Persson, T., Tabellini, G.: Is inequality harmful for growth? Am. Econ. Rev. 84, 600–621 (1994)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Persson, T., Tabellini, G.: Political Economics. MIT Press, Massachusetts (2000)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Popkin, S.: The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1991)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Riker, W., Ordeshook, P.: A theory of the calculus of voting. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 62, 25–42 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Reis, R.: Inattentive producers. Rev. Econ. Stud. 73, 793–821 (2006a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Reis, R.: Inattentive consumers. J. Monet. Econ. 53, 1761–1800 (2006b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Smith, J.: Race and human capital. Am. Econ. Rev. 74, 685–698 (1984)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Strömberg, D.: Radio’s impact on public spending. Q. J. Econ. 119, 189–221 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Takii, K., Tanaka, R.: Does the diversity of human capital increase GDP?: a comparison of education systems. Osaka University OSIPP Discussion Paper, 06–05 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of EconomicsOsaka UniversityToyonaka, OsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations