Differences in Induced Volatile Emissions among Rice Varieties Result in Differential Attraction and Parasitism of Nilaparvata lugens Eggs by the Parasitoid Anagrus nilaparvatae in the Field
- 466 Downloads
We compared the volatiles of JA-treated plants of six rice varieties and then determined, in the laboratory and field, if they differed in attractiveness to Anagrus nilaparavate Pand et Wang, an egg parasitoid of rice planthoppers. Analyses of volatiles revealed significant differences among varieties, both in total quantity and quality of the blends emitted. On the basis of these differences, the six varieties could be roughly divided into three groups. In a Y-tube olfactometer, female wasps preferred odors from two groups. These preferences corresponded to observed parasitism rates in a field experiment. A comparison of the volatiles with results from behavioral assays and field experiments indicates that the quality (composition) of the blends is more important for attraction than the total amount emitted. The results imply that the foraging success of natural enemies of pests can be enhanced by breeding for crop varieties that release specific volatiles.
KeywordsRice Anagrus nilaparavate Nilaparvata lugens Induced plant volatiles Jasmonic acid Volatiles variability Host-searching behavior Parasitism Parasitoid
We thank Wenwen Song, Guoxin Zhou, and Xia Wang for assistance with laboratory work. The study was sponsored by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (973) (G2000016208), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30270233, 30370960), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents of the Ministry of Education of China (NCET-04-0534), and the Innovation Research Team Program of the Ministry of Education of China (IRT0355).
- Cheng, J. and He, J. 1996. Rice Insect Pests. China Agricultural Press, Beijing.Google Scholar
- Dicke, M. 1999. Specificity of herbivore-induced plant defences, pp. 43–59, in D. J. Chadwich and J. Good (eds.). Insect–Plant Interactions and Induced Plant Defence. Novartis Foundation Symposium 223. Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
- Flint, H. M., Salter, S. S., and Walters, S. 1979. Caryophyllene: An attractant for the green lacewing. Environ. Entomol. 8:1123–1125.Google Scholar
- Halitschke, R., Schittko, U., Pohnert, G., Boland, W., and Baldwin, I. T. 2001. Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. III. Fatty acid-amino acid conjugates in herbivore oral secretions are necessary and sufficient for herbivore-specific plant responses. Plant Physiol. 125:711–717.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Janssen, A., Van Alphen, J. J. M., Sabelis, M. W., and Bakker, K. 1995. Specificity of odour-medeated avoidance of competition in Drosophila parasitoids. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 36:229–235.Google Scholar
- Krips, O. E., Willems, P. E. L., Gols, R., Posthumus, M. A., Gort, G., and Dicke, M. 2001. Comparison of cultivars of ornamental crop Gerbera jamesonii on production of spider mite-induced volatiles, and their attractiveness to the predator Phytoseiulus persimilis. J. Chem. Ecol. 27:1355–1372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lou, Y. 1999. Role of infochemicals in host selection behavior of Anagrus nilaparvatae Pang et Wang. Ph.D. dissertation, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.Google Scholar
- Ma, B., Lou, Y., and Cheng, J. 2004. Effects of some biotic factors on activities of the volatiles emitted from rice plants infested by the rice brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stål). J. of Zhejiang Univ. (Agriculture and Life Science) 30(6):589–595.Google Scholar
- Turlings, T. C. J. and Wäckers, F. L. 2004. Recruitment of predators and parasitoids by herbivore-damaged plants, pp. 21–75, in R. T. Cardé and J. Millar (eds.). Advances in Insect Chemical Ecology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Turlings, T. C. J., Wäckers, F. L., Vet, L. E. M., Lewis, W. J., and Tumlinson, J. H. 1993b. Learning of host-finding cues by hymenopterous parasitoids, pp. 51–78, in D. R. Papaj and A. C. Lewis (eds.). Insect Learning. Ecology and Evolutionary Perspectives. Chapman & Hall, New York.Google Scholar
- Zhu, L., Zhu, C., Weng, Q., Huang, Z., and He, G. 2004. Research progress on brown planthopper resistance genes in rice. Hubei Agric. Sci. 1:19–24.Google Scholar