Sexual Isolation and Cuticular Hydrocarbon Differences between Drosophila santomea and Drosophila yakuba
- 266 Downloads
Drosophila santomea and Drosophila yakuba are two sister species inhabiting Saõ Tomé island. Previous studies showed that both species display strong reproductive isolation, although they can produce a few viable hybrids. Our study tried to understand the mechanism of this ethological isolation between two allopatric strains. A strong sexual isolation was confirmed, with a marked asymmetry. Comparisons of latency times to either courtship or copulation suggest that males do not discriminate females, whereas D. yakuba females, but not D. santomea females, accept their homospecifics more quickly. Cuticular hydrocarbon compositions of both species and sexes were also established with gas chromatography (GC) and GC/mass spectrometry analysis. All have (Z)-7-tricosene as their major compound. There are several quantitative differences between species for few minor compounds. The largest difference concerns n-heneicosane, which is more abundant in D. santomea than in D. yakuba flies (up to seven times more between males). A similar quantitative difference was also found in a pair of sympatric strains. Furthermore, D. yakuba males artificially perfumed with n-heneicosane were discriminated negatively by D. yakuba females, suggesting a role for this compound in the sexual isolation between these two species.
Key WordsDrosophila santomea Drosophila yakuba reproductive isolation courtship hydrocarbon pheromone
We thank Dr Daniel Lachaise for providing all strains collected on Saõ Tomé island. Also, thanks to Helena Alvès for her technical help in CHC analyses and to Dr David Carlson for gifts of synthetic tricosenes and pentacosenes.
- Cobb, M., Jallon, J. M. 1990Pheromones, mate recognition and courtship stimulation in the Drosophila melanogaster species sub-groupAnim. Behav.3910581067Google Scholar
- Ewing, A. 1983Functional aspects of Drosophila courtshipBiol. Rev.58275292Google Scholar
- Jallon, J. M., David, J. R. 1987Variations in cuticular hydrocarbons among the eight species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroupEvolution41294302Google Scholar
- Lachaise, D., Harry, M., Solignac, M., Lemeunier, F., Benassi, V., Cariou, M. L. 2000Evolutionary novelties in islands: Drosophila santomea, a new melanogaster sister species from Saõ ToméProc. R. Soc. Lond., B Biol. Sci.26714871495Google Scholar
- Scott, D. 1994Genetic variation for female mate discrimination in Drosophila melanogasterEvolution48112121Google Scholar