Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 31, Issue 11, pp 2747–2752 | Cite as

Sexual Isolation and Cuticular Hydrocarbon Differences between Drosophila santomea and Drosophila yakuba

Rapid Communication


Drosophila santomea and Drosophila yakuba are two sister species inhabiting Saõ Tomé island. Previous studies showed that both species display strong reproductive isolation, although they can produce a few viable hybrids. Our study tried to understand the mechanism of this ethological isolation between two allopatric strains. A strong sexual isolation was confirmed, with a marked asymmetry. Comparisons of latency times to either courtship or copulation suggest that males do not discriminate females, whereas D. yakuba females, but not D. santomea females, accept their homospecifics more quickly. Cuticular hydrocarbon compositions of both species and sexes were also established with gas chromatography (GC) and GC/mass spectrometry analysis. All have (Z)-7-tricosene as their major compound. There are several quantitative differences between species for few minor compounds. The largest difference concerns n-heneicosane, which is more abundant in D. santomea than in D. yakuba flies (up to seven times more between males). A similar quantitative difference was also found in a pair of sympatric strains. Furthermore, D. yakuba males artificially perfumed with n-heneicosane were discriminated negatively by D. yakuba females, suggesting a role for this compound in the sexual isolation between these two species.

Key Words

Drosophila santomea Drosophila yakuba reproductive isolation courtship hydrocarbon pheromone 



We thank Dr Daniel Lachaise for providing all strains collected on Saõ Tomé island. Also, thanks to Helena Alvès for her technical help in CHC analyses and to Dr David Carlson for gifts of synthetic tricosenes and pentacosenes.


  1. Cobb, M., Jallon, J. M. 1990Pheromones, mate recognition and courtship stimulation in the Drosophila melanogaster species sub-groupAnim. Behav.3910581067Google Scholar
  2. Coyne, J. A., Kim, S. Y., Chang, A. S., Lachaise, D., Elwyn, S. 2002Sexual isolation between two sibling species with overlapping ranges: Drosophila santomea and Drosophila yakubaEvolution5624242434PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ewing, A. 1983Functional aspects of Drosophila courtshipBiol. Rev.58275292Google Scholar
  4. Ferveur, J.-F. 2005Cuticular hydrocarbons: Their evolution and roles in Drosophila pheromonal communicationBehav. Genet.35279295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Jallon, J. M. 1984A few chemical words exchanged between Drosophila during courtship and matingBehav. Genet.14441478CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Jallon, J. M., David, J. R. 1987Variations in cuticular hydrocarbons among the eight species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroupEvolution41294302Google Scholar
  7. Lachaise, D., Harry, M., Solignac, M., Lemeunier, F., Benassi, V., Cariou, M. L. 2000Evolutionary novelties in islands: Drosophila santomea, a new melanogaster sister species from Saõ ToméProc. R. Soc. Lond., B Biol. Sci.26714871495Google Scholar
  8. Llopart, A., Elwyn, S., Lachaise, D., Coyne, J. A. 2002Genetics of a difference in pigmentation between Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila santomeaEvolution5622622277PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Rouault, J. R., Marican, C., Wicker-Thomas, C., Jallon, J. M. 2004Relations between hydrocarbon polymorphism, resistance against desiccation and breeding temperature; a model for HC evolution in D. melanogaster and D. simulansGenetica120195212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Scott, D. 1994Genetic variation for female mate discrimination in Drosophila melanogasterEvolution48112121Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire de Neurobiologie de l'Apprentissage, de la Mémoire et de la Communication, UMR-CNRS 8620.Bat 446Université Paris Sud XIOrsay CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations