The Supporting Role of the Mangasarian-Fromovitz Constraint Qualification in Calculus of Variations

Abstract

The Mangasarian-Fromovitz constraint qualification has played a fundamental role in mathematical programming problems involving inequality constraints. It is known to be equivalent to a normality condition (in terms of the positive linear independence of active gradients) which, in turn, implies regularity (the tangent and the linearizing cones coincide), a condition which has been crucial in the derivation of first- and second-order necessary optimality conditions. In this paper, we study the corresponding implications for problems in the calculus of variations. In particular, we show how the equivalence between normality and the Mangasarian-Fromovitz constraint qualification is preserved, but also that their main role changes completely since, as a simple example shows, they may not imply the corresponding regularity condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Aubin JP, Frankowska H. Set-valued analysis. Boston: Birkhäuser; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Becerril JA, Rosenblueth JF. Necessity for isoperimetric inequality constraints. Discrete Contin Dyn Syst Ser A 2017;37:1129–58.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Becerril JA, Rosenblueth JF. The importance of being normal, regular and proper in the calculus of variations. J Optim Theory Appl 2017;172:759–73.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Becerril JA, Cortez KL, Rosenblueth JF. Uniqueness of multipliers in optimal control: the missing piece. IMA J Math Control Inf 2019;36:1395–411.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ben-Tal A. Second-order and related extremality conditions in nonlinear programming. J Optim Theory Appl 1980;31:143–65.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Clarke F. Functional analysis, calculus of variations and optimal control. London: Springer; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Cortez KL, Rosenblueth JF. Normality and uniqueness of Lagrange multipliers. Discrete Contin Dyn Syst Ser A 2018;38:3169–88.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Cortez KL, Rosenblueth JF. The broken link between normality and regularity in the calculus of variations. Syst Control Lett 2019;124:27–32.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    de Pinho MR, Rosenblueth JF. Mixed constraints in optimal control: an implicit function theorem approach. IMA J Math Control Inf 2007;24:197–218.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Elster KH, Thierfelder J. On cone approximations of sets. Mathematical methods in operations research (Summer School on Operations Research—Primorsko, 1984). In: Kenderov P, editors. Sofia; 1985. p. 33–59.

  11. 11.

    Giorgi G, Guerraggio A. On the notion of tangent cone in mathematical programming. Optimization 1992;25:11–23.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Giorgi G, Guerraggio A, Thierfelder J. Mathematics of optimization: smooth and nonsmooth case. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Hestenes MR. Calculus of variations and optimal control theory. New York: Wiley; 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hestenes MR. Optimization theory, the finite dimensional case. New York: Wiley; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kyparisis J. On uniqueness of Kuhn-Tucker multipliers in nonlinear programming. Math Program 1985;32:242–6.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    McShane EJ. The Lagrange multiplier rule. Am Math Mon 1973; 80:922–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Osmolovskii NP. Second-order conditions for a weak local minimum in an optimal control problem (necessity, sufficiency). Soviet Math Dokl 1975;16:1480–84.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Rosenblueth JF. Convex cones and conjugacy for inequality control constraints. J Convex Anal 2007;14:361–93.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Rosenblueth JF, Sánchez Licea G. Cones of critical directions in optimal control. Int J Appl Math Inf 2013;7:55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wachsmuth G. On LICQ and the uniqueness of Lagrange multipliers. Oper Res Lett 2013;41:78–80.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author is grateful to CONACYT for the support. The second author is grateful to DGAPA, from Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, for the support given as part of the PASPA program during a sabbatical stay at the Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, UK.

Funding

The first author received financial support from CONACYT and the second author from DGAPA-UNAM.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javier F. Rosenblueth.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cortez, K.L., Rosenblueth, J.F. The Supporting Role of the Mangasarian-Fromovitz Constraint Qualification in Calculus of Variations. J Dyn Control Syst (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10883-021-09534-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Calculus of variations
  • Normality
  • Regularity
  • Tangent cone
  • Tangential constraints

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

  • 49K15