Behavioral Indicators of Satiation: a Systematic Review

  • Rachel Scalzo
  • Tonya N. Davis


The use of behavioral indicators as a measure of satiation was a procedure developed by O'Reilly et al. (Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 773–783, 2009) to systematically manipulate presession access to a tangible reinforcer. In order to gain a better understanding of the utility of behavioral indicators of satiation in applied settings, a systematic literature review was conducted identifying nine additional studies that implemented this procedure. This review synthesized the research in terms of participant characteristics, use of behavioral indicators, dependent variables, and study outcomes. Results suggest this procedure is an effective way to decrease challenging behaviors and increase adaptive, on-task behaviors, adding to the literature in regard to the manipulation of abolishing operations as well as serving to identify future investigations into the use of behavioral indicators as a measure of satiation.


Satiation Abolishing operations Behavioral indicators 


Compliance with Ethical Standards


This study did not receive funding.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


The asterisk denotes studies reviewed as part of this research.

  1. Berg, W. K., Peck, S., Wacker, D. P., Harding, J., McComas, J., Richman, D., & Brown, K. (2000). The effects of presession exposure to attention on the results of assessments of attention as a reinforcer. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 463-477. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-463.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Cengher, M., Jones, E. A., & Fienup, D. M. (2014). The effects of presession attention on tacting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 176-180.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chung, Y., & Cannella-Malone, H. I. (2010). The effects of presession manipulations on automatically maintained challenging behavior and task responding. Behavior Modification, 34, 479-502.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. *Davis, T. N., Fuentes, L., & Durand, S. (2014). Examination of systematic durations of presession reinforcer access on functional communication training. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26(3), 263-270. doi: 10.1007/s10882-013-9360-2
  5. *Fragale, C. L., O’Reilly, M. F., Aguilar, J., Pierce, N., Lang, R., Sigafoos, J., & Lancioni, G. (2012). The influence of motivating operations on generalization probes of specific mands by children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 565-577. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-565
  6. Gewirtz, J. L., & Baer, D. M. (1958). Deprivation and satiation of social reinforcers as drive conditions. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 57, 165-172. doi: 10.1037/h0042880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Howlett, M. A., Sidener, T. M., Progar, P. R., Sidener, D. W., Higbee, T. S. (2011). Manipulation of motivating operations and use of a script-fading procedure to teach mands for location to children with language delays. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 943-947.Google Scholar
  8. Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197-209. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197 .Original work published 1982CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Kahng, S., Iwata, B. A., Thompson, R. H., & Hanley, G. P. (2000). A method for identifying satiation versus extinction effects under noncontingent reinforcement schedules. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 419-432. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-419.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Kuhn, D. E., Hardesty, S. L., & Luczynski, K. (2009). Further evaluation of antecedent social events during functional analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 349-353. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-349.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. *Lang, R., O'Reilly, M., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G. E., Machalicek, W., Rispoli, M., & White, P. (2009). Enhancing the effectiveness of a play intervention by abolishing the reinforcing value of stereotypy: A pilot study. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 889-894. doi:  10.1901/jaba.2009.42-889
  12. *Lang, R., O’Reilly, M., Sigafoos, J., Machalicek, W., Rispoli, M., Lancioni, G. E., Aguilar, J., & Fragale, C. (2010). The effects of an abolishing operation intervention component on play skills, challenging behavior, and stereotypy. Behavior Modification, 34, 267-289.Google Scholar
  13. Langthorne, P., & McGill, P. (2009). A tutorial on the concept of the motivating operation and its importance to application. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 2, 22-31.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Laraway, S., Snycersky, S., Michael, J., & Poling, A. (2003). Motivating operations and terms to describe them: Some further refinements. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 407-414. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2003.36-407.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. *Neely, L., Rispoli, M., Gerow, S., & Ninci, J. (2015). Effects of antecedent exercise on academic engagement and stereotypy during instruction. Behavior Modification, 39, 98-116. doi: 10.1177/0145445514552891
  16. O'Reilly, M. F. (1999). Effects of presession attention on the frequency of attention-maintained behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 371-374. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-371.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. *O'Reilly, M., Lang, R., Davis, T., Rispoli, M., Machalicek, W., Sigafoos, J., & ... Didden, R. (2009). A systematic examination of different parameters of presession exposure to tangible stimuli that maintain problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 773-783. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-773
  18. *O'Reilly, M., Aguilar, J., Fragale, C., Lang, R., Edrisinha, C., Sigafoos, J., & ... Didden, R. (2012). Effects of a motivating operation manipulation on the maintenance of mands. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 443-447. doi:  10.1901/jaba.2012.45-443
  19. Paclawskyj, T. R., Matson, J. L., Rush, K. S., Smalls, Y., & Vollmer, T. R. (2001). Assessment of the convergent validity of the Questions About Behavioral Function Scale with analogue functional analysis and Motivation Assessment Scale. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 45, 484-494.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Rapp, J. T. (2004). Effects of prior access and environmental enrichment on stereotypy. Behavioral Interventions, 19, 287-295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. *Rispoli, M., O'Reilly, M., Lang, R., Machalicek, W., Davis, T., Lancioni, G., & Sigafoos, J. (2011a). Effects of motivating operations on problem and academic behavior in classrooms. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 187-192. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-187.
  22. *Rispoli, M. J., O'Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Lang, R., Kang, S., Lancioni, G., & Parker, R. (2011b). Effects of presession satiation on challenging behavior and academic engagement for children with autism during classroom instruction. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 607-618.Google Scholar
  23. *Rispoli, M., Camargo, S., Neely, L., Gerow, S., Lang, R., Goodwyn, F., & Ninci, J. (2014). Pre-session satiation as a treatment for stereotypy during group activities. Behavior Modification, 38, 392-411. doi: 10.1177/0145445513511631
  24. Thibadeau, S., Blew, P., Reedy, P., & Luiselli, J. K. (1999). Access to white bread as an intervention for chronic ruminative vomiting. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 30, 137-144. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7916(99)00012-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Baylor UniversityWacoUSA

Personalised recommendations