Advertisement

Functional Analysis Outcomes and Comparison of Direct Observations and Informant Rating Scales in the Assessment of Severe Behavior Problems of Infants and Toddlers At-Risk for Developmental Delays

  • Stephen R. Schroeder
  • David M. Richman
  • Layla Abby
  • Andrea B. Courtemanche
  • Rosa Oyama-Ganiko
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Severe problem behaviors, like aggression, self-injury, and repetitive behaviors, in people with intellectual and developmental disabilities often appear during early development and may persist without early intervention. The frequencies of self-injurious behavior, aggression, tantrums, property destruction and stereotyped behavior among 17 infants and toddlers at risk for developmental delays and severe behavior problems were assessed using two methods: 1) direct observation of responses during 10 s partial interval recording during analogue functional analysis and 2) the Behavior Problem Inventory-01 (BPI-01; Rojahn et al. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 577–588, 2001), an informant rating scale. Analogue functional analysis results suggested that the most common function for problem behavior was automatic reinforcement, followed by negative reinforcement in the form of escape from demands. Agreement across the two types of measurement systems as to occurrence of the behaviors reported on the BPI-01 and direct observations during analogue functional analyses was greater than 75 % across aggression, self-injury, and stereotyped behavior. Agreement at a more molecular level of the ranking of the most commonly occurring specific behaviors was considerably lower. Results are discussed in terms of future research on identifying conditions that set the occasion for high levels of agreement between indirect and direct measurement systems for severe behavior problems.

Keywords

Functional analysis Informant ratings Infants Toddlers Developmental delays 

Notes

Disclaimer

This research was supported by the Fogarty International Center and the NICHD of NIH, grant no. HD060500. The opinions stated herein reflect those of the authors and not necessarily of the NIH or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

References

  1. Barlow, D. H., Nock, M., & Hersen, M. (2008). Single-case experimental designs (3rd ed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  2. Barnard-Brak, L., Rojahn, J., & Wei, T. (2014). Psychometric analysis of the behavior problems inventory using an item-response theory framework: a sample of individuals with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. doi: 10.1007/s10862-013-9356-3.
  3. Bayley, N. (2006). Manual of the Bayley scales of infant and toddler development (3rd ed.). San Antonio: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar
  4. Beavers, G., Iwata, B. A., & Lerman, D. (2013). Thirty years of research on the functional analysis of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 1–21. doi: 10.1002/jaba.30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkson, G., Tupa, M., & Sherman, L. (2001). Early development of stereotyped and self-injurious behaviors: I. incidence. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 106(6), 539–547.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gonzalez, M. L., Dixon, D. R., Esbensen, A., Rojahn, J., Matson, J. L., Terlonge, C., & Smith, K. R. (2009). The behavior problems inventory: reliability and factor validity in institutionalized adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 22, 223–235. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2008.00429.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Guilford, J. P. (1956). Statistics in psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  8. Hagopian, L., Fisher, W., Thompson, R., Owen-DeSchryver, J., Iwata, B. A., & Wacker, D. (1997). Toward the development of structured criteria for interpretation of functional analysis data. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 313–326.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hanley, G., Iwata, B., & McCord, B. (2003). Functional analysis of problem behavior: a review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 147–185.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1982). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnston, J. M., & Pennypacker, H. S. (2009). Strategies and tactics of behavioral research (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Kurtz, P., Huete, J., Cataldo, M., & Chin, M. (2012). Identification of emerging self-injurious behavior in young children: a preliminary study. Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 5, 260–285. doi: 10.1080/19315864.2011.600809.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Matson, J. L., Dempsey, T., & Fodstad, J. (2009). Stereotypies and repetitive/restrictive behaviors in infants with autism and pervasive developmental disorder. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 12, 122–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mayo-Ortega, L., Oyama-Ganiko, R., LeBlanc, J., Schroeder, S.R., Brady, N., Butler, M.G., … Marquis, J. (2012). Mass screening for severe problem behavior among infants and toddlers in Peru. Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 5, 246–259.Google Scholar
  15. Morris, E., Higgins, S., & Bickel, W. (1982). Comments on cognitive science in the experimental analysis of behavior. Behavior Analyst, 5, 109–125.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Richman, D. M., & Lindauer, S. E. (2005). Longitudinal assessment of stereotypic, proto-injurious, and self-injurious behavior exhibited by young children with developmental delays. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 110(6), 439–450. doi: 10.1352/0895-8017(2005)110[439:LAOSPA]2.0.CO;2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rojahn, J., Matson, J. L., Lott, D., Esbensen, A. J., & Smalls, Y. (2001). The behavior problems inventory: an instrument for the assessment of self-injury, stereotyped behavior, and aggression/destruction in individuals with developmental disabilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 577–588. doi: 10.1023/A:1013299028321.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rojahn, J., Aman, M. G., Matson, J. L., & Mayville, E. (2003). The aberrant behavior checklist and the behavior problems inventory: convergent and divergent validity. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24, 391–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rojahn, J., Wilkins, J., Matson, J., & Boisjoli, J. (2010). A comparison of adults with intellectual disabilities with and without ASD on parallel measures of challenging behaviour: the Behavior Problems Inventory-01 (BPI-01) and Autism Spectrum Disorders-Behavior Problems for Intellectually Disabled Adults (ASD-BPA). Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 23, 179–185. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2009.00519.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rojahn, J., Rowe, E. W., Sharber, A. C., Hastings, R. P., Matson, J. L., Didden, R., Kroes, D. B. H., & Dumont, E. L. M. (2012a). The Behavior Problems Inventory-Short Form (BPI-S) for individuals with intellectual disabilities I: development and provisional clinical reference data. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 527–545.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rojahn, J., Rowe, E. W., Sharber, A. C., Hastings, R. P., Matson, J. L., Didden, R., Kroes, D. B. H., & Dumont, E. L. M. (2012b). The Behavior Problems Inventory-Short Form (BPI-S) for individuals with intellectual disabilities II: reliability and validity. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 546–565.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schopler, E., Reichler, R. J., & Renner, B. R. (1988). The child autism rating scale. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services Corporation.Google Scholar
  23. Schroeder, S. R., Rojahn, J., An, X., Mayo-Ortega, L., Rosao, O.-G., & LeBlanc, J. (2013). The parental concerns questionnaire: a valid brief screening instrument for severe behavior problems among infants and toddlers at risk for developmental delays. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities. doi: 10.1007/s10882-013-9359-8.Google Scholar
  24. Schroeder, S.R., Marquis, J. Reese, R.M., Richman, D.M., Mayo-Ortega, L., …. Lawrence, L.M. (2014). Risk factors for self-injury, aggression, and stereotyped behavior among young children at risk for intellectual and developmental disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. (in press)Google Scholar
  25. Sturmey, P., Fink, C., & Sevin, J. (1993). The behavior problems inventory: a replication and extension of its psychometric properties. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 5, 327–336. doi: 10.1007/BF01046389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thompson, T., & Lubinski, D. (1986). Units of analysis and kinetic structure of behavioral repertoires. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 219–242. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-219.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wacker, D., Berg, W., Harding, J., Derby, M., Asmus, J., & Healy, A. (1998). Evaluation and long-term treatment of aberrant behavior displayed by young children with disabilities. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 19, 260–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wetherby, A. M., & Prizant, B. M. (2002). Communication and symbolic behavior scales developmental profile. Baltimore: Paul Brookes Publishing Co., Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen R. Schroeder
    • 1
  • David M. Richman
    • 2
  • Layla Abby
    • 2
  • Andrea B. Courtemanche
    • 4
  • Rosa Oyama-Ganiko
    • 3
  1. 1.University of KansasLawrenceUSA
  2. 2.Texas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA
  3. 3.Centro Ann Sullivan del PeruLimaPeru
  4. 4.University of Kansas Medical CenterKansas CityUSA

Personalised recommendations