An Evaluation of a Direct Instructions Flashcard System on the Acquisition and Generalization of Numerals, Shapes, and Colors for Preschool-Aged Students with Developmental Delays
- 447 Downloads
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the DI Flashcard system for teaching preliminary mathematic skills to three preschool students. The participants attended a self-contained special education preschool. All three participants’ eligibility category was “developmentally delayed”. A concurrent multiple baseline design across three sets (colors, shapes, and numerals) was use to evaluate the effectiveness of the DI flashcard system. The results indicated that all three participants showed an increase in their performance when DI flashcards were in effect. However, the amount of improvement varied for each participant. The importance of employing evidence-based procedures to teach skills to preschool students with developmental delays was outlined.
KeywordsDI flashcards Preschool Color Shape and numeral identification Generalization Developmental delays
The author would like to thank the participants for their cooperation during the study, as well as the cooperating teachers and instructional aids for their assistance.
- Becker, A., McLaughlin, T.F., Weber, K.P., & Gower, J. (2009). The effects of copy, cover, and compare with and without error drill on multiplication fact fluency and accuracy. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 18, 747–760. Retrieved from http://www.investigacion-psicopedagogica.rg/revista/new/english/anteriores.php.
- Cipani, E. (1988). Transitioning exception children and youth in the community: Research and practice. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
- Dunst, C. J., Snyder, S. W., & Mankinen, M. (1989). Efficacy of early intervention. In M. C. Wang, M. C. Reynolds, & G. H. Walber (Eds.), Handbook of special education: Research and practice−Low incidence conditions (pp. 259–294). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
- Erbey, R., McLaughlin, T.F., Derby, K.M., & Everson, M. (2011). The effects of using flashcards with reading racetrack to teach letter sounds, sight words, and math facts to elementary students with disabilities. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 3, 213–226. Retrieved from http://www.iejee.com/index.html.
- Farran, D. (2000). Another decade of intervention for children who are low-income and disabled: what do we know now? In J. Shonkoff & S. Meisels (Eds.), Handbook of early intervention (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Glover, P., McLaughlin, T. F., Derby, K. M., & Gower, J. (2010). Using a direct instruction flashcard system employing a back three contingency for errors with two students with learning disabilities. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8, 457–482.Google Scholar
- Herberg, K., McLaughlin, T. F., Derby, K. M., & Gilbert, V. (2011). The effects of direct instruction flashcards on shape recognition and recall for two preschool students with disabilities. Academic Research International, 1, 59–64.Google Scholar
- Hopewell, K, McLaughlin, T.F., & Derby, K.M. (2011). The effects of reading racetracks with direct instruction flashcards and a token system on sight word acquisition for two primary students with severe conduct disorders. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9, 693–710. Retrieved from http://www.investigacion-psicopedagogica.org/revista/new/english/anteriores.php.
- Howard, V. F., Williams, B. F., & Lepper, C. (2011). Very young children with special needs: A foundation for educators, families, and service providers (4th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall/Pearson.Google Scholar
- H.R. 1350--108th Congress: Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004. (2003). In GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). Retrieved December 23, 2012, from http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/108/hr1350.
- Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. V. (1994). The morning side model of generative instructions. In R. Gardner III, D. M. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. W. Eshelman, & T. A. Grassi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instructions (pp. 173–197). Pacific Grove: Brookes/Cole.Google Scholar
- Katz-Sulgrove, M., Peck, S. M., & McLaughlin, T. F. (2002). The effects of code and meaning emphasis in beginning reading for students with mild disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 17, 65–83.Google Scholar
- Kaufman, L., McLaughlin, T. F., Derby, K. M., & Waco, T. (2011). Employing reading racetracks and DI flashcards with and without copy, cover, and compare and rewards to teach of sight words to three students with learning disabilities in reading. Educational Research Quarterly, 34.Google Scholar
- Kazdin, A. E. (2010). Single case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Livingstone, D. W. (1998). The education-jobs gap: Underemployment or economic democracy. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
- Lordeman, A., & Jones, N. L. (2010). The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) interactions with selected provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) (Congressional Research Service, No. 7–5700, RL32913). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Marchand-Martella, N. E., Slocum, T. A., & Martella, R. C. (Eds.). (2004). Introduction to direct instruction. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
- McCloskey, M., & Macaruso, P. (1995). Representing and using numerical information. American Psychologist, 50, 351–363.Google Scholar
- Ruwe, K., McLaughlin, T. F., Derby, K. M., & Johnson, K. (2011). The multiple effects of direct instruction flashcards on sight word acquisition, passage reading, and errors for three middle school students with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 23, 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sante, D. A., McLaughlin, T. F., & Weber, K. P. (2001). The use and evaluation of a direct instruction flash card strategy on multiplication facts mastery with two students with -ADHD. Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 17, 68–75.Google Scholar
- Shouse, H., Weber, K. P., McLaughlin, T. F., & Riley, S. (2012). The effects of model, lead, and test and a reward to teach a preschool student with a disability to identify colors. Academic Research International, 2(1), 477–483.Google Scholar
- Silbert, J., Carnine, D. W., & Stein, M. (1981). Direct instruction mathematics. Columbus: Charles E. Merrill.Google Scholar
- Stein, A., Kinder, D., Silbert, J., & Carnine, D. W. (2006). Designing effective mathematics instruction: A direct instruction approach. Upper Saddles River: Merrill/Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
- Travis, J. McLaughlin, T.F., Derby, K.M., Dolliver, P., & Carosella, M. (2012). He differential effects racetrack procedures for saying letter sounds with two first-grade students with disabilities. Academic Research International, 2, 372–382. Retrieved from http://184.108.40.206/~savaporg/journals/issue/html.
- U. S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Office of Special Education Programs. (2005). Twenty-fifth annual report to congress on the implementation of the individuals with disabilities education act (Vol. 1). Washington, D. C: Author.Google Scholar
- Wakeman, S.Y., Browder, D.M., Meier, I., & McColl, A. (2007). The implications of no child left behind for students with developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13, 143–150. doi: 10.102/mrdd.20147.