Advertisement

Early Categorization of Animate/Inanimate Concepts in Young Children with Autism

  • Cynthia R. Johnson
  • D. H. Rakison
Article

Categorization and concept formation deficits along with other cognitive processing deficits have been suggested in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). A compelling early cognitive deficit is the formation of coherent concepts for animates and inanimates. Development of such concepts is thought to be a crucial building block for young children’s emerging understanding that different object kinds possess different physical, psychological, biological, and motion-related properties [Rakison, D. H., and Poulin-Dubois, D. (2001). Psychol. Bull. 127(2): 209–228]. In this preliminary study, 11 preschoolers with ASD participated in two experiments that tested early concept formation. A visually-based habituation paradigm was used to test whether young children with ASD could detect correlations among static and dynamic cues and whether they were selective in the correlations to which they attend. A more interactive imitation task was used to test children’s knowledge of simple linear and nonlinear motions of animates and inanimates. Results suggest that the preschoolers with autism are delayed in the processes by which they form categories but nonetheless possess relevant knowledge about the motion properties of animates and inanimates. Implications of this preliminary study are discussed.

KEY WORDS:

autism categorization cognitive processes cognitive development 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Partial support was provided by Seeding Funding, Research Advisory Committee, and Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh.

REFERENCES

  1. Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mind Blindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  2. Castelli, F., Frith, C., Happe, F., and Frith, U. (2002). Autism, Asperger Syndrome, and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states in animated shapes. Brain 125: 1839–1849.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dawson, G., and Osterling, J. (1997). Early intervention in autism: Effectiveness and common elements of current approaches. In Gurlanick, M. J. (ed.), Effectiveness of Early Intervention, Brooks, Baltimore, MD, pp. 307–326.Google Scholar
  4. Eimas, P. D., and Quinn, P. C. (1994). Categorization in early infancy and the continuity of development. Cognition 50: 83–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Grandin, T. (1995). Thinking in Pictures, Vintage Books, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Jones, S. S., and Smith, L. B. (1993). The place of perception in children’s concepts. Cogn. Dev. 8: 113–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Klinger, L., and Dawson, G. (2001). Prototype formation in autism. Dev. Psychopathol. 13: 111–124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Leaf, R., and McEachin, J. (1999). A Work in Progress: Behavior Management Strategies and a Curriculum for Intensive Behavioral Treatment of Autism, DRL Books, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P. C., and Risi, S. (1999). Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule: A Standardized Observation of Communicative and Social Behavior, Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  10. Lovaas, O. I. (2003). Teaching Individuals with Developmental Delays: Basic Intervention Techniques, Pro-Ed, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
  11. Lovaas, O. I., Koegel, R., and Schriebman, L. (1979). Stimulus overselectivity in autism. A review of research. Psychol. Bull. 86: 1236–1254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mandler, J. M. (1992). How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives. Psychol. Rev. 99: 587–604.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mandler, J. M. (2000). Perceptual and conceptual processes in infancy. J. Cogn. Dev. 1: 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mandler, J. M., and McDonough, L. (1996). Drinking and driving don’t mix: Inductive generalization in infancy. Cognition 59(3): 307–335.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mandler, J. M., and McDonough, L. (1998). On developing a knowledge base in infancy [Journal Article]. Dev. Psychol. 34: 1274–1288.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Minshew, N., Johnson, C. R., and Luna, B. (2000). The cognitive and neural basis of autism: A disorder of complex information processing and dysfunction of neocortical systems. In Glidden, L. M. (ed.), International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, Academic, New York, pp. 111–138.Google Scholar
  17. Minshew, N. J., Meyer, J., and Goldstein, G. (2002). Abstract reasoning in autism: A disassociation between concept formation and concept identification. Neuropsychology 16: 327–334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ozonoff, S. (1997). Components of executive function in autism and other disorders. In Russell, J. (ed.), Autism as an Executive Disorder, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 179–211.Google Scholar
  19. Pierce, K., Glad, K. S., and Schriebman, L. (1997). Social perception in children with autism: An attentional deficit? J. Autism Dev. Disord. 27: 265–282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Quinn, P. C., and Eimas, P. D. (1996). Perceptual organization and categorization in young infants. In Rovee-Collier, C., and Lipsitt, L. P. (eds.), Advances in Infancy Research, Vol. 11, Ablex, Norwood, NJ, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar
  21. Rakison, D. (2003). Parts, categorization, and the animate–inanimate distinction in infancy. In Rakison, D. H., and Oakes, L. M. (eds.), Making Sense of the Blooming Buzzing Confusion: Concept and Category Development in the First Years, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Rakison, D. H. (2004). Infants’ sensitivity to correlations among static and dynamic features in a category context. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 89: 1–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rakison, D. H. (2005). Developing knowledge of motion properties in infancy. Cognition 96: 183–214.Google Scholar
  24. Rakison, D. H., and Poulin-Dubois, D. (2001). Developmental origin of the animate–inanimate distinction. Psychol. Bull. 127(2): 209–228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rakison, D., and Poulin-Dubois, D. (2002). You go this way and I’ll go that way: Developmental changes in infants’ detection of correlations among static and dynamic features in motion events. Child Dev. 73: 682–699.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rogers, S., Hepburn, S., Stackhouse, T., and Wehner, E. (2003). Imitation performance in toddlers with autism and those with other developmental disorders. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 44: 763–781.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schreibman, L. (2000). Intensive behavioral/psychoeducational treatments for autism: Research needs and future directions. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 30: 373–378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shulman, C., Yirmiya, N., and Greenbaum, C. (1995). From categorization to classification: A comparison among individuals with autism, mental retardation, and normal development. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 104: 601–609.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Slater, A., and Quinn, P. C. (2001). Face recognition in the newborn infant. Infant Child Dev. 10(1–2): 21–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith, T., Groen, A. D., and Wynn, J. W. (2000). Randomized trial of intensive early intervention for children with pervasive developmental disorder. Am. J. Ment. Retard. 105: 269–285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stone, W. L., Ousley, O. Y., and Littleford, C. D. (1997). Motor imitation in young children with autism: What’s the object? J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 25: 475–485.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tager-Flusberg, H. (1985). Basic level and superordinate level of categorization in autistic, mentally retarded and normal children. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 40: 450–469.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thorndike, R. L., Hagen, E. P., and Sattler, J. M. (1986). Stanford–Binet Intelligence Scale, 4th edn., Riverside, Chicago.Google Scholar
  34. Travis, L., and Sigman, M. (2001). Communication intentions and symbols in autism: Examining a case of altered development. In Burack, J., Charman, T., Yirkiya, N., and Zelazo, P. (eds.), The Development of Autism: Perspectives from Theory and Research, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 279–308.Google Scholar
  35. Ungerer, J. A., and Sigman, M. (1984). The relation of play and sensorimotor behavior to language in the second year. Child Dev. 55(4): 1448–1455.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Younger, B. A., and Cohen, L. B. (1986). Developmental change in infants’ perception of correlations among attributes. Child Dev. 57(3): 803–815.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, Autism CenterPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Carnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations