College Students’ Romantic Attraction Toward Peers with Physical Disabilities
This study investigated how romantically attracted college students were toward peers with and without a physical disability and whether romantic attraction was a function of motivational characteristics (Reiss Profile; Reiss, S., and Havercamp, S., 1998. Psychol. Assess. 10: 97–106) and degrees of discomfort in interacting with people with disabilities (Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale [IDP]; Gething, L., 1994). One hundred twenty-three participants (41 males and 82 females) from different racial groups were recruited. Participants received a packet with 16 photographs of individuals each paired with a biographical vignette. They rated each of the 16 portrayed individuals with the Romantic Attraction Scale (Campell, W., 1999. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 77: 1254–1270). The presence of a disability did not influence ratings of romantic attractiveness. In addition, select subscales of the IDP and Reiss Profile's motivational traits predicted ratings of attraction. Furthermore, romantic attraction within racial groups tended to be stronger than across racial groups. Implications of these findings are discussed and suggestions are made for future research.
KEY WORDS:physical disabilities; attraction; sexuality; attitudes; motivation; personality
- Disability Statistics Center (1997). How is disability described for people with disabilities? (1997). http://dsc.ucsf.edu/UCSF/spl.taf?_from = default. Retrieved November 5, 2003 from http://dsc.ucsf.edu/UCSF/pub.taf?_UserReference = 07CB36536A1DEB45C357D9E4 &_function = other&_array = OTH6&grow = 7Google Scholar
- Gething, L. (1994). The interaction with disabled persons scale. J. Soc. Behav. Pers. 9: 23–42.Google Scholar
- Karnilowicz, W., Sparrow, W., and Shinkfield, A. (1994). J. Soc. Behav. Pers. 9: 65–80.Google Scholar
- Olkin, R., and Howson, L. (1994). Attitudes toward and images of physical disability. J. Soc. Behav. Pers. 9: 81–96.Google Scholar
- Yuker, H. (1994). Variables that influence attitudes toward people with disabilities: Conclusions from the data. J. Soc. Behav. Pers. 9: 3–22.Google Scholar