Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ethics and Confidentiality for Psychologists in Academic Health Centers

  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Psychologists in academic health centers (AHC) face important ethical issues including confidentiality when working with a multidisciplinary team, sharing of information through the electronic health record, obtaining informed consent in a fast-paced healthcare environment, cultural competency in the medical setting, and issues related to supervision and training. The goal of this paper is to describe ethical issues for psychologists in AHCs in the context of case examples, and to consider ethical decision-making tools to enhance clinical care. Considerations for best practices in integrated care settings will be discussed, and the APA Ethical Standards will be referenced throughout.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The case examples described in this paper are fictionalized composite cases similar to actual cases seen in clinical practice in AHCs.

References

  • American Psychological Association. (1990). Guidelines for providers of psychological services to ethnic, linguistic, and culturally diverse populations. http://www.apa.org/pi/oema/resources/policy/provider-guidelines.aspx.

  • American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx.

  • Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. (2005). ASPPB code of conduct. Montgomery, AL: Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. http://www.asppb.org/publications/model/conduct.aspx.

  • Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. (2015). Supervisory guidelines for education and training leading to licensure as a health service provider. Montgomery, AL: Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.asppb.net/resource/resmgr/Guidelines/Final_Supervision_Guidelines.pdf.

  • Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2014). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (5th ed.). Uppers Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibla, T., Pena, A., & Bruce, C. (2015). Consultations across languages. Hastings Center Report 45, 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemens, N. A. (2012). Privacy, consent, and the electronic health record: The person vs. the system. Journal of Psychiatry Practice, 18, 46–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falender, C. A., & Shafranske, E. P. (2004). Clinical supervision: A competency-based approach. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, C. B. (2014). Multicultural ethics in professional psychology practice, consulting, and training. In F. T. L. Leong, L. Comas-Diaz, G. C. Nagayama Hall, V. C. McLoyd, J. E. Trimble (Eds.), APA handbook of multicultural psychology, Vol. 2: Applications and training (pp. 35–57). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, D., & Pawsey, M. (2014). Medical tourism raises questions that highlight the need for care and caution. Medical Journal of Australia, 201, 568–569.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, J., Mendenhall, T., & Lamson, A. (2013). Patient and provider relationships: Consent, confidentiality, and managing mistakes in integrated primary care settings. Families, Systems and Health, 31, 28–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hudgins, C., Rose, S., Fifield, P. Y., & Arnault, S. (2013). Navigating the legal and ethical foundations of informed consent and confidentiality in integrated primary care. Families, Systems, & Health, 31, 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, S. J., & VandeCreek, L. D. (2012). Practical ethics for psychologists: A positive approach (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunt, N., & Mannion, R. (2014). Patient mobility in the global marketplace: A multidisciplinary perspective. International Journal of Health Policy Management, 2, 155–157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, B. A., Baum, R. A., & Soares, N. S. (2013). Navigating ethical issues with electronic health records in developmental-behavioral pediatric practice. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 34, 45–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohio Board of Psychology. (2014). Laws and rules governing the practice of psychology. Columbus, OH: Requirements pertaining to supervision. Retrieved July 17, 2017 from http://codes.ohio.gov/oac/4732-13-04.

  • Snyder, J., Johnston, R., Crooks, V. A., Morgan, J., & Adams, K. (2016). How medical tourism enables preferential access to care: Four patterns from the Canadian context. Health Care Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-015-0312-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Office of Minority Health. (2013). National standards for culturally and linguistically appropriate services in health and health care: A blueprint for advancing and sustaining CLAS policy and practice. https://www.thinkculturalhealth.hhs.gov/Content/clas.asp.

  • Van Liew, J. R. (2012). Balancing confidentiality and collaboration within multidisciplinary health care teams. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 19, 411–417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathleen Ashton.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors Kathleen Ashton and Amy Sullivan declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committees and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ashton, K., Sullivan, A. Ethics and Confidentiality for Psychologists in Academic Health Centers. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 25, 240–249 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-017-9537-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-017-9537-4

Keywords

Navigation