Prospective Comparison of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) and MMPI-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) in Predicting Treatment Outcomes Among Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain
The purpose of the current study was to examine the relative utility of the most updated MMPI adult instrument, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF), which was designed to address psychometric limitations of the MMPI-2. To this end, we compared mean scores and correlates of emotional distress treatment outcomes using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in a sample of 230 patients (73 males, 157 females) who had completed an interdisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation program. Structural equation modeling analyses indicated that higher scale scores from all the MMPI-2-RF substantive domains were meaningfully associated with worse emotional distress outcomes, whereas the MMPI-2 Clinical Scales generally did not have any meaningful associations. Similar results were found in additional analyses using a clinically significant change framework with more direct clinical implications. The results of this study provide preliminary support for the use of the MMPI-2-RF among patients with chronic low back pain.
KeywordsMMPI-2-RF Chronic pain Back pain Treatment outcome Applied assessment
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Yossef Ben-Porath is a paid consultant to the MMPI-2-RF publisher, the University of Minnesota Press, and a distributor for Pearson Assessments. He receives royalties on sales of MMPI-2-RF materials and research Grants from the MMPI-2-RF publisher. Anthony Tarescavage also receives research funding from the MMPI-2-RF publisher. The authors thank Dr. Kelly Huffman for her help with institutional review board processing and approval. Judith Scheman declares that she does not have any conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights
All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committees and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publisher.Google Scholar
- Arbisi, P. A., Polusny, M. A., Erbes, C. R., Thuras, P., & Reddy, M. K. (2011). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form in National Guard soldiers screening positive for posttraumatic stress disorder and mild traumatic brain injury. Psychological Assessment, 23(1), 203. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021339.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2008/2011). MMPI-2-RF: Manual for administration, scoring and interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Browne, M. W., Cudeck, R., Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Editions, 154, 136–136.Google Scholar
- Butcher, J., Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., Dahlstrom, G. W., & Kaemmer, B. (2001). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2: Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Chou, R., Qaseem, A., Snow, V., Casey, D., Cross, J. T. Jr., Shekelle, P., & Owens, D. K. (2007). Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: A joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(7), 478–491.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Freburger, J. K., Holmes, G. M., Agans, R. P., Jackman, A. M., Darter, J. D., Wallace, A. S., … Carey, T. S. (2009). The rising prevalence of chronic low back pain. Archives of Internal Medicine, 169(3), 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2008.543.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Graham, J. R. (2012). The MMPI-2: Assessing personality and psychopathology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & McNulty, J. L. (1999). MMPI-2 correlates for outpatient community mental health settings. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1943). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- LaBar, G. (1992). A battle plan for back injury prevention. Occupational Hazards, 11, 29–33.Google Scholar
- Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1996). Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. Sydney: Psychology Foundation of Australia.Google Scholar
- Marek, R. J., Block, A. R., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2014). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form: (MMPI-2-RF): Incremental validity in predicting early postoperative outcomes in spine surgery candidate. Psychological Assessment, 27(1), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/PAS0000035.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- McCord, D. M., & Drerup, L. C. (2011). Relative practical utility of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Clinical Scales versus the Clinical Scales in a chronic pain patient sample. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33(1), 140–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2010.495056.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- McNeil, J. M., & Binette, J. (2001). Prevalence of disabilities and associated health conditions among adults-United States, 1999. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(12), 1571–1572.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2010). Mplus user’s guide, v 6.1. Los Angeles: Muthen and Muthen, UCLA.Google Scholar
- Reichenbach, H. (1938). Experience and prediction: An analysis of the foundations and the structure of knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Tarescavage, A. M. (2015). Predicting treatment outcomes among low back pain patients using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form. (Dissertation, Ph. D.), Kent State University, Kent, OH. Retrieved from http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent1447070671.
- Tellegen, A., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2008/2011). Minnesota mutliphasic personality inventory-2-Restructured Form: Technical manual. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Von Korff, M., Crane, P., Lane, M., Miglioretti, D. L., Simon, G., Saunders, K., … Kessler, R. (2005). Chronic spinal pain and physical-mental comorbidity in the United States: Results from the national comorbidity survey replication. PAIN, 113(3), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2004.11.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yu, C. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes. Los Angeles: University of California Los Angeles.Google Scholar