Can Blended Classroom and Distributed Learning Approaches be Used to Teach Medical Students How to Initiate Behavior Change Counseling During a Clinical Clerkship?
Medical school curricula often provide insufficient time and instruction for health behavior change counseling. We examined the feasibility of blending classroom and distributed learning experiences to teach medical students how to initiate health behavior change counseling and analyzed the impact of this approach on their attitudes, knowledge, and skills. Usage patterns and pre- to post-class attitude and knowledge changes were assessed with self-report questions among 153 third year family medicine clerkship students. Most students viewed at least 90% of the online written content and took an average of 41 min (SD = 24 min 35 s) to view all of the content. Students’ confidence in their ability to help patients change unhealthy behaviors significantly improved (p < .01). The blended learning curriculum facilitated learning of behavior change skills, encouraged interaction with course materials, and improved medical students’ self confidence for using health behavior change skills.
KeywordsHealth behavior change Medical education Instructional methods
- Association of American Medical Colleges Institute for Improving Medical Education. (2007). Effective use of educational technology in medical education. Washington, DC: AAMC.Google Scholar
- Abid, A., Galuska, D., Khan, L. K., Gillespie, C., Ford, E. S., & Serdula, M. K. (2005). Are healthcare professionals advising obese patients to lose weight? A trend analysis. Medscape General Medicine, 7, 10. Retrieved from http://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/514048.
- Chickering, A., & Ehrmann, S. (1996). Implementing the seven principles: Technology as lever. AAHE Bulletin, 49, 3–6.Google Scholar
- Clark, R., & Mayer, R. (2003). e-Learning and the science of instruction. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.Google Scholar
- Committee on Behavioral and Social Sciences in Medical School Curricula, Cuff, P., & Vanselow, N. (Eds.). (2004). Improving medical education: enhancing the behavioral and social science content of medical school curricula. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction. Boston: Pearson Education/Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Fordis, M., King, J. E., Ballantyne, C. M., Jones, P. H., Schneider, K. H., Spann, S. J., et al. (2005). Comparison of the instructional efficacy of Internet-based CME with live interactive CME workshops: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 294, 1043–1051. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.9.1043.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gagne, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K. G., & Keller, J. M. (2005). Principles of instructional design. Toronto: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
- Graham, C. R. (2005). In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.Google Scholar
- Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Moore, J., Sener, J., & Fetzner, M. (2006). Getting better: ALN and student success. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10, 55–84.Google Scholar
- Picciano, A. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6, 21–40.Google Scholar
- Prochaska, J., Johnson, S., & Lee, P. (2009). The transtheoretical model of behavior change. In S. A. Shumaker, J. K. Ockene, & K. A. Riekert (Eds.), The handbook of health behavior change (pp. 59–83). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Rollnick, S., Miller, W. R., & Butler, C. C. (2008). Motivational interviewing in health care. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Simonson, M., Smaldino, S. E., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2008). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar