Abstract
Although motivational interviewing (MI) is a widely used intervention for alcohol and drug problems, little is known about client and therapist experiences. Client and therapist views could help better understand how MI works and what factors are important. This paper investigates experiences of clients and therapists who participated in a study that examined a standard single session of MI (MI 1) and a more intensive 9-session model (MI 9) for methamphetamine dependence. Qualitative methods included open ended questions presented to 184 clients at 2-month follow-up and 189 clients at 6-month follow-up. In addition, a focus group consisting of two therapists who delivered the interventions and two adherence monitors who listened to audiotape recordings of sessions was conducted. Clients in both conditions felt supportive, nonjudgmental therapist attitudes were helpful. Most clients in the MI 9 condition but few receiving MI 1 volunteered that feedback and advice were helpful. A strong majority in both conditions desired more sessions. Expert panel members emphasized: (1) multiple benefits of a nonjudgmental stance, (2) finding the right balance among different MI interventions, and (3) understanding the interaction of supportive and directive interventions. Panel members also emphasized that one advantages of MI 9 over MI 1 was that it enabled client change plans to be implemented over time.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carroll, K. M., Ball, S. A., Nich, C., Martino, S., Frankforter, T. L., Farentinos, C., et al. (2006). Motivational interviewing to improve treatment engagement and outcome in individuals seeking treatment for substance abuse: A multisite effectiveness study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 81(3), 301–312.
Galloway, G. P., Polcin, D. L., Kielstein, A., Brown, M., & Mendelson, J. (2007). High dose motivational enhancement therapy for methamphetamine dependence. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, SARC Supplement, 4, 393–400.
Hettema, J., Steele, J., & Miller, W. R. (2005). Motivational interviewing. Annual Reviw of Clinical Psychology, 1, 91–111.
Korcha, R. A., Polcin, D. L., Evans, K., Bond, J. C., & Galloway, G. P. (2014). Intensive motivational interviewing for women with concurrent alcohol problems and methamphetamine dependence. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 46, 113–119.
Lundahl, B., & Burke, B. L. (2009). The effectiveness and applicability of motivational interviewing: a practice-friendly review of four meta-analyses. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(11), 1232–1245.
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Morgenstern, J., & McKay, J. R. (2007). Rethinking the paradigms that inform behavioral treatment research for substance use disorders. Addiction, 102, 1377–1389.
Moyers, T. B., Miller, W. R., & Hendrickson, S. M. (2005). How does motivational interviewing work? Therapist interpersonal skill predicts client involvement within motivational interviewing sessions. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 73(4), 590–598.
Orford, J. (2008). Asking the right questions in the right way: the need for a shift in research on psychological treatments for addiction. Addiction, 103(6), 875–885.
Orford, J., Hodgson, R., Copello, A., Wilton, S., & Slegg, G. (2009). To what factors do clients attribute change? Content analysis of follow-up interviews with clients of the UK alcohol treatment trial. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 36(1), 49–58.
Polcin, D. L., Bond, J., Korcha, R., Nayak, M., Galloway, G. P., & Evans, K. (2014). Randomized trial of intensive motivational interviewing for methamphetamine dependence. Journal of Addictive Diseases. doi:10.1080/10550887.2014.950029.
Polcin, D. L., Galloway, G. P., Palmer, J., & Mains, W. (2004). The case for high-dose motivational enhancement therapy. Substance Use and Misuse, 39(2), 331–343.
White, M. (2007). MAPS of Narrative Practice. New York: Norton & Co.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Polcin, D.L., Sterling, J., Brown, T. et al. Client and Therapist Views About Intensive and Standard Motivational Interviewing. J Contemp Psychother 45, 167–176 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-014-9280-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-014-9280-1