Skip to main content
Log in

Positive Psychotherapy According to the Socratic Method

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present article explores the integration of positive psychology and the Socratic method. Positive psychology provides an important shift of focus, helping psychotherapists to move away from an exclusive focus on problems, symptoms, and pathology. Instead, psychotherapy sessions can include a strong emphasis on personal qualities and social resources for managing stressful situations. The Socratic method provides a broad framework that is compatible with positive psychology. Three areas are explored that integrate positive psychology with the Socratic method: (a) A focus on developing positive views of self and other people, (b) positive goals for life-long changes, and (c) a positive process for therapy that is guided by collaboration and exploration. When combined, these three focal shifts can help to soften the style of therapy and expand the relevance of treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Gander, F., Proyer, R., Ruch, W., & Wyss, T. (2013). Strength-based positive interventions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1241–1259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, R., & Snyder, C. R. (2006). Blending the good with the bad. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 20(2), 117–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashdan, T., & Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 865–878.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lyubomirsky, S., & Layous, K. (2013). How do simple positive activities increase well-being? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(1), 57–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, P., & Kashdan, T. (2009). Purpose in life as a system that creates and sustains health and well-being. Review of General Psychology, 13(3), 242–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overholser, J. C. (1993a). Elements of the Socratic method: I. Systematic questioning. Psychotherapy, 30, 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overholser, J. C. (1993b). Elements of the Socratic method: II. Inductive reasoning. Psychotherapy, 30, 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overholser, J. C. (1994). Elements of the Socratic method: III. Universal definitions. Psychotherapy, 31, 286–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overholser, J. C. (1995). Elements of the Socratic method: IV. Disavowal of knowledge. Psychotherapy, 32, 283–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overholser, J. C. (1996a). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of depression, Part III: reducing cognitive biases. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 25(4), 311–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overholser, J. C. (1996b). Elements of the Socratic method: V. Self-Improvement. Psychotherapy, 33, 549–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overholser, J. C. (1999a). Elements of the Socratic method: VI. Promoting virtue in everyday life. Psychotherapy, 36, 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overholser, J. C. (1999b). Courage and the Socratic method of psychotherapy. Voices. Journal of the American Academy of Psychotherapists, 35(3), 6–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overholser, J. C. (2010). Psychotherapy according to the Socratic Method: Integrating ancient philosophy with contemporary cognitive therapy. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 24(4), 355–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overholser, J. C. (2011). Collaborative empiricism, guided discovery, and the Socratic method: Core processes for effective cognitive therapy. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice, 18(1), 62–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overholser, J. C. (2013). Guided discovery: Problem-solving therapy integrated within the Socratic method. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 43(2), 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, N., Peterson, C., & Brunwasser, S. (2010). Positive psychology and therapy. In N. Kazantzis, M. Reinecke, & A. Freeman (Eds.), Cognitive and behavioral theories in clinical practice (pp. 287–306). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peseschkian, N., Biland, F., & Cope, T. (2010). Symptom, conflict and conflict-resultion. International Journal of Psychotherapy, 14(1), 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietrowsky, R., & Mikutta, J. (2012). Effects of positive psychology interventions in depressive patients. Psychology, 3(12), 1067–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R., Huta, V., & Deci, E. (2008). Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 139–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C., & Singer, B. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 13–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. (2011). Flourish. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M., & Csikszentimihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M., Parks, A., & Steen, T. (2004). A balanced psychology and a full life. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society for Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1379–1381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M., & Pawelski, J. (2003). Positive Psychology: FAQs. Psychological Inquiry, 14(2), 159–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M., Rashid, T., & Parks, A. (2006). Positive psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 61(8), 774–788.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. (2013). Can positive psychotherapy meet the basic principles of effectiveness as outlined by Grawe? International Journal of Psychotherapy, 17(1), 42–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sin, N., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2009). Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Session, 65(5), 467–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steger, M., Kashdan, T., & Oishi, S. (2008). Being good by doing good: Daily eudaimonic activity and well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 22–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toussaint, L., & Friedman, P. (2009). Forgiveness, gratitude, and well-being: The mediating role of affect and beliefs. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 635–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James C. Overholser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Overholser, J.C. Positive Psychotherapy According to the Socratic Method. J Contemp Psychother 45, 137–142 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-014-9279-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-014-9279-7

Keywords

Navigation