Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 273–281 | Cite as

Protesting the Decline While Predicting the Demise of Clinical Psychology: Can We Avoid a Total Collapse?

Original Paper


The present article confronts several areas of concern that could undermine the integrity of clinical psychology. A critical review is provided in the hopes of pushing for change, primarily in the way that academic clinical psychologists conduct their work. Six standards are proposed toward which all members of the clinical psychology faculty should aspire. First, it is important for clinical psychologists to integrate the science and practice of psychology. Second, the training and supervision of all applied skills in clinical psychology assumes that the instructor has remained active in the front-lines delivery of clinical services. Third, it is important to conduct research on clinical samples, striving to understand the mind of patients who are struggling with mental illness. Fourth, it is helpful to retain a modest and flexible view about the potential benefits derived from empirically supported treatments. Fifth, even when accepting a bio-psycho-social model, psychologists should maintain a dominant focus on psychological factors. Sixth, ethical issues pervade many aspects of a professor’s work, and it is important to avoid dual relationships that could impair objectivity and professionalism. If these six standards are widely adopted, clinical psychology can remain a strong and vibrant field.


Professional training Ethics Scientist-practitioner 


  1. Addis, M., & Krasnow, A. (2000). A national survey of practicing psychologists’ attitudes toward psychotherapy treatment manuals. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(2), 331–339.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical Principles of psychologists and code of conduct. APA Online.Google Scholar
  3. American.Psychological Association, Division of Clinical Psychology. (1991). The definition and description of clinical psychology. The Clinical Psychologist, 44(1), 5–11.Google Scholar
  4. Appuhamy, J., Ohga, M., Kaita, T., Chun, P., & Dissanayake, B. (2013). Development of an efficient maintenance strategy for corroded steel bridge infrastrucures. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 18, 464–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnett, J. (2008). The neglected 95 %: Why American psychology needs to become less America. American Psychologist, 63(7), 602–614.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker, T., McFall, R., & Shoham, V. (2008). Current status and future prospects of clinical psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(2), 67–103.Google Scholar
  7. Barrom, C., Shadish, W., & Montgomery, L. (1988). PhDs, PsyDs, and real-world constraints on scholarly activity: Another look at the Boulder model. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19(1), 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belar, C. (2008). Changing educational needs of psychologists. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 15, 12–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Belar, C., & Perry, N. (1992). National conference on scientist-practitioner education and training for the professional practice of psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beutler, L., Williams, R., Wakefield, P., & Entwistle, S. (1995). Bridging scientist and practitioner perspectives in clinical psychology. American Psychologist, 50(12), 984–994.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Biaggio, M., Paget, T., & Chenoweth, M. (1997). A model for ethical management of faculty-student dual relationships. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28(2), 184–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brett, C., & Lu, Y. (2013). Assessment of robustness of structures. Frontiers of Structural Civil Engineering, 7(4), 356–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Calhoun, K., Moras, K., Pilkonis, P., & Rehm, L. (1998). Empirically supported treatments: Implications for training. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(1), 151–162.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davison, G. (1998). Being bolder with the Boulder model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(1), 163–167.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DiLillo, D., DeGue, S., Cohen, L., & Morgan, R. (2006). The path to licensure for academic psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37(5), 567–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Drabick, D., & Goldfried, M. (2000). Training the scientist-practitioner for the 21st century: Putting the bloom back on the rose. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 327–340.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellingwood, B., & Dusenberry, D. (2005). Building design for abnormal loads and progressive collapse. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 20, 194–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Enright, B., Carey, C., & Caprani, C. (2013). Microsimulation evaluation of Eurocode load model for American long-span bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 18, 1252–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ericsson, K., Krampe, R., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fernald, A. (2010). Getting beyond the “convenience sample” in research on early cognitive development. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 91–92.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Flexner, A. (1910). Medical education in the United States and Canada. New York: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Google Scholar
  22. Fly, B., van Bark, W., Weinman, L., Kitchner, K., & Lang, P. (1997). Ethical transgressions of psychology graduate students: Critical incidents with implications for training. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28(5), 492–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goldfried, M., & Wolfe, B. (1998). Toward a more clinically valid approach to therapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(1), 145–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gottlieb, M., Robinson, K., & Younggren, J. (2007). Multiple relations in supervision: Guidance for administrators, supervisors, and students. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 38(3), 241–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grierson, D., Xu, L., & Liu, Y. (2005). Progressive failure analysis of buildings subjected to abnormal loading. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 20, 155–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Henrich, J., Heine, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2010a). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2/3), 61–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Henrich, J., Heine, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2010b). Beyond weird: Towards a broad-based behavioral science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2/3), 111–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Himelein, M., & Putnam, E. (2001). Work activities of academic clinical psychologists: Do they practice what they teach. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32, 537–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jarmon, H., & Halgin, R. (1987). The role of the psychology department clinic in training scientist-professionals. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18(5), 509–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones, J., & Mehr, S. (2007). Foundations and assumptions of the scientist-practitioner model. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(6), 766–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kanfer, F. (1990). The scientist-practitioner connection: A bridge in need of constant attention. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 21(4), 264–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kazdin, A., Kratochwill, T., & Vandenbos, G. (1986). Beyond clinical trials: Generalizing from research to practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 17(5), 391–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lamb, D., & Catanzaro, S. (1998). Sexual and nonsexual boundary violations involving psychologists, clients, supervisees, and students: Implications for professional practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29(5), 498–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lamb, D., Catanzaro, S., & Moorman, A. (2004). A preliminary look at how psychologists identify, evaluate, and proceed when faced with possible multiple relationship dilemmas. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35(3), 248–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Levant, R. (2007). The empirically validated treatments movement. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(2), 219–224.Google Scholar
  36. Liu, J. (2010). Preventing progressive collapse through strengthening beam-to-column connection. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 66, 229–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marjanishvili, S., & Agnew, E. (2006). Comparison of various procedures for progressive collapse analysis. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 20(4), 365–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McCabe, O. (2004). Crossing the quality chasm in behavioral health care: The role of evidence-based practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35(6), 571–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McFall, R. (1991). Manifesto for a science of clinical psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 44(6), 75–88.Google Scholar
  40. McFall, R. (2006). Doctoral training in clinical psychology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2, 21–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McFall, R. (2012). Psychological clinical science accreditation system. The Behavior Therapist, 35(1), 11–15.Google Scholar
  42. Messer, S. (2004). Evidence-based practice: Beyond empirically supported treatments. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35(6), 580–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Myers, D. (2007). Implication of the scientist-practitioner model in counseling psychology. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(6), 789–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nair, R. (2006). Preventing disproportionate collapse. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 20(4), 309–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nakamura, S., & Suzumura, K. (2012). Experimental study on repair methods of corroded bridge cables. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 17(4), 720–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Norcross, J., Klonsky, E., & Tropiano, H. (2008). The research-practice gap: Clinical scientists and independent practitioners speak. The Clinical Psychologist, 61(3), 14–17.Google Scholar
  47. Oberlander, S., & Barnett, J. (2005). Multiple relationships between graduate assistants and students: Ethical and practical considerations. Ethics and Behavior, 15(1), 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Overholser, J. C. (2003). Where has all the psyche gone: Searching for treatments that focus on psychological issues. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 33(1), 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Overholser, J. C. (2007). The Boulder model in academia: Struggling to integrate the science and practice of psychology. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 37, 205–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Overholser, J. C. (2010a). Ten criteria to qualify as a scientist-practitioner in clinical psychology: An immodest proposal for objective standards. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 40(1), 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Overholser, J. C. (2010b). Clinical expertise: A preliminary attempt to clarify its core elements. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 40(3), 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Overholser, J. C. (2012). Behind a thin veneer: What lurks beneath the scientist-practitioner label? Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 42(4), 271–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Overholser, J. C. (2014). Chasing the latest fad: Confronting recent and historical innovations in mental illness. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 44(1), 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Overholser, J. C., Braden, A., & Fisher, L. (2010). You’ve got to believe: Core beliefs that underlie effective psychotherapy. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 40(4), 185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Owen, P., & Zwahr-Castro, J. (2007). Boundary issues in academia: Student perceptions of faculty-student boundary crossings. Ethics and Behavior, 17(2), 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Persons, J. (1991). Psychotherapy outcome studies do not accurately represent current models of psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 46(2), 99–106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Petersen, C. (2007). A historical look at psychology and the scientist-practitioner model. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(6), 758–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Peterson, R. (2001). On the use of college students in social science research. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 450–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pipes, R., Holstein, J., & Aguirre, M. (2005). Examining the personal-professional distinction: Ethics codes and the difficulty of drawing a boundary. American Psychologist, 60(4), 325–334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rosenberg, A., & Heimberg, R. (2009). Ethical issues in mentoring doctoral students in clinical psychology. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 16(2), 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rozin, P. (2009). What kind of empirical research should we publish, fund, and reward? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(4), 435–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schotte, C., VandenBossche, B., VandenBosche, B., DeDoncker, D., Claes, S., & Cosyns, P. (2006). A biopsychosocial model as a guide for psychoeducation and treatment of depression. Depression and Anxiety, 23, 312–324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sharifi, Y., & Paik, J. (2011). Ultimate strength reliability analysis of corroded steel-box girder bridges. Thin-Walled Structures, 40, 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Skovholt, T., & Jennings, L. (2004). Master therapists: Exploring expertise in therapy and counseling. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  65. Skovholt, T., Ronnestad, M., & Jennings, L. (1997). Searching for expertise in counseling, psychotherapy, and professional psychology. Educational Psychology Review, 9(4), 361–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Spring, B. (2007). Evidence-based practice in clinical psychology. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63(7), 611–637.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Starossek, U. (2007). Disproportionate collapse: A pragmatic approach. Structures & Buildings, 160, 317–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tanner, P., & Danielson, M. (2007). Components necessary for the preparation of the scientist-practitioner. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(6), 772–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vakoch, D., & Strupp, H. (2000). The evolution of psychotherapy training: Reflections on manual-based learning and future alternatives. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(3), 309–318.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vespia, K. (2006). Integrating professional identities: Counselling psychologist, scientist-practitioner and undergraduate educator. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 19(3), 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vespia, K., & Sauer, E. (2006). Defining characteristics or unrealistic ideal. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 19(3), 229–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wampold, B., & Bhati, K. (2004). Attending to the omissions: A historical examination of evidence-based practice movements. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35(6), 563–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhang, W., Cai, C., & Pan, F. (2013). Fatigue reliability assessment for long-span bridges under combined dynamic loads from wind and vehicles. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 18, 735–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCase Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations