Advertisement

Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 97–104 | Cite as

Advancing the Field of Psychotherapy Through Innovation and Integration in Scholarly Works

  • James C. Overholser
Original Paper

Abstract

Published articles on psychotherapy often incorporate a combination of integration and innovation, helping to advance the field through scholarly work. Many useful papers help to integrate the biological, psychological, and social or cultural factors that often play a role in the etiology and treatment of specific forms of mental illness. In addition, quality papers strive to integrate theory, science, and clinical applications throughout the text. Authors can encourage a series of minor innovations that could gradually shift the field over time. Useful papers often focus on a narrow topic that has a broad appeal to many members of the field. Authors can explore new ideas, expressing their opinions while supporting the ideas through various types of evidence. When submitting papers for publication, authors should expect it will require multiple revisions in order to sharpen the thinking and improve the writing.

Keywords

Scholarship Publishing Research Theory Innovation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Julia DiFilippo, Jim Yokley, Nicole Peak, AnnaMaria Aguierre, and Sarah Yarry for helpful comments provided on earlier drafts of this paper.

References

  1. Babor, T. (2006). Publish or perish: The art of managing a successful scientific journal. Addiction, 101(5), 640–641.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brackbill, Y., & Korten, F. (1970). Journal reviewing practices: Authors’ and APA members suggestions for revision. American Psychologist, 25, 937–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chisholm, K. (2007). Strategies for publishing in scholarly HRD journals. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 18(1), 139–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DeBakey, L. (1976). The scientific journal: Editorial policies and practices. St. Louis: Mosby.Google Scholar
  5. DeBakey, L., & DeBakey, S. (1982). Medical writing: Let thy words be few. International Journal of Cardiology, 2, 127–132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DeBakey, L., & DeBakey, S. (1983a). The case report: Guidelines for preparation. International Journal of Cardiology, 4, 357–364.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DeBakey, L., & DeBakey, S. (1983b). The title: What’s in a name? International Journal of Cardiology, 2, 401–406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeBakey, L., & DeBakey, S. (1983c). The abstract: an abridged scientific report. International Journal of Cardiology, 3, 439–445.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DeBakey, L., & DeBakey, S. (1983d). Syntactic orphans and adoptees: Unattached participles I. Mischievous intruders. International Journal of Cardiology, 3, 67–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeBakey, L., & DeBakey, S. (1983e). Syntactic orphans and adoptees: Unattached participles II: Medical misconstructions. International Journal of Cardiology, 3, 231–236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Denehy, J. (2006). Publishing an article in the Journal of School Nursing: An overview of the publication process. Journal of School Nursing, 22(6), 307–309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eysenck, H., & Eysenck, B. (1992). Peer review: Advice to referees and contributors. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(4), 393–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fromm, E. (1981). How to write a clinical paper. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 29, 5–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Furer, P., & Walker, J. (2005). Treatment of hypochondriasis with exposure. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 35(3), 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gavey, N., & Braun, V. (1997). Ethics and the publication of clinical case material. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28(4), 399–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gottfredson, D., & Gottfredson, S. (1982). Criminal justice and (reviewer) behavior: How to get papers published. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 9(3), 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Halpern, D., Smoothergill, D., Allen, M, Baker, S., Baum, C., Best, D., et al (1998). Scholarship in psychology. American Psychologist, 53(12), 1292–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Herbert, J. (2007). Further thoughts on writing for publication. Rehabilitation Education, 21(2), 71–72.Google Scholar
  19. Hutchinson, G., & Chapman, B. (2005). Logotherapy-enhanced REBT: An integration of discovery and reason. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 35(2), 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huth, E. (1982). How to write and publish papers in the medical sciences. Philadelphia: ISI Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kline, W., & Farrell, C. (2005). Recurring manuscript problems: Recommendations for writing, training, and research. Counselor Education & Supervision, 44, 166–174.Google Scholar
  22. Kosciulek, J. (2004). Practical guidelines for effective writing: Part I – preparation. Rehabilitation Education, 18(4), 207–209.Google Scholar
  23. Kosciulek, J. (2005). Practical guidelines for effective writing: Part II – organization. Rehabilitation Education, 19(1), 3–4.Google Scholar
  24. Kosciulek, J. (2006). Practical guidelines for effective writing: Part III – writing the first draft. Rehabilitation Education, 20(1), 3–5.Google Scholar
  25. Kosciulek, J., & Wheaton, J. (2003). On writing. Rehabilitation Education, 17(1), 3–7.Google Scholar
  26. Kosciulek, J., & Wheaton, J. (2004). On scientific inquiry. Rehabilitation Education, 18(2), 71–75.Google Scholar
  27. Kupfersmid, J. (1988). Improving what is published: A model in search of an editor. American Psychologist, 43(8), 635–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lantz, J., & Gregoire, T. (2003). Existential trauma therapy with men after a heart attack. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 33(1), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lundberg, G. (2002). The publishing dilemma of the American Psychological Association. American Psychologist, 57(3), 211–212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mahrer, A. (2006). The creation of new ideas in psychotherapy. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS books.Google Scholar
  31. Mahrer, B. (1978). A reader’s, writer’s, and reviewer’s guide to assessing research reports in clinical psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(4), 835–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McCarty, R. (2002). Science, politics, and peer review. American Psychologist, 57(3), 198–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Noble, K. (1989). Publish or perish: What 23 journal editors have to say. Studies in Higher Education, 14(1), 97–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. O’Connor, M. (1979). The scientist as editor. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  35. Orne, M. (1981). The why and how of a contribution to the literature. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 29, 1–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Overholser, J. C. (1991). Prompting and fading in the treatment of compulsive checking. Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 22, 271–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Overholser, J. C. (2002). Contemporary psychotherapy: Goldmines and landmines. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 32, 249–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Overholser, J. C. (2003). Where has all the psyche gone: Searching for treatments that focus on psychological issues. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 33(1), 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Overholser, J. C. (2004). Contemporary psychotherapy: Moving beyond a therapeutic dialogue. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 34(4), 365–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Overholser, J. C. (2005). Contemporary Psychotherapy: Promoting personal responsibility for therapeutic change. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 35(4), 369–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Overholser, J. C. (2006). Panacea or placebo: The historical quest for medications to treat depression. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 36(4), 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Overholser, J. C. (2007). The Boulder model in academia: Struggling to integrate the science and practice of psychology. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 37 (4), 205–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Overholser, J. C., Adams, D., Lehnert, K., & Brinkman, D. (1995). Self-esteem deficits in adolescent psychiatric inpatients. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 34, 919–928.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Overholser, J. C., & Schubert, D. (1996). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of depression: Part VI. Integrating the use of antidepressant medications. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 26, 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Peterson, R., & Trierweiler, S. (1999). Scholarship in psychology: The advantages of an expanded vision. American Psychologist, 54(5), 350–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Piercy, F., Moon, S., & Bischof, G. (1994). Difficult journal article rejections among prolific family therapists: A qualitative critical incident study. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 20(3), 231–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Routh, D. (1995). Confessions of an editor, including mistakes I have made. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 24(2), 236–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schubert, D. (1987). Guidelines for reviewers of manuscript submitted for publication. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 17(2), 113–115.Google Scholar
  49. Schwitzer, A., Guiffrida, D., & Choate, L. (2005). Publishing in the Journal of College Counseling. Journal of College Counseling, 8, 98–106.Google Scholar
  50. Stewart, P., Wu, Y., & Roberts, M. (2007). Top producers of scholarly publications in clinical psychology PhD programs. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63(12), 1209–1215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Taylor, S., Abramowitz, J., McKay, D., Stewart, S., & Asmundson, G. (2006). Publish without perishing, part 2: More suggestions for students and new faculty. The Behavior Therapist, 29(2), 21–26.Google Scholar
  52. White, L. (2005). Writes of passage: Writing an empirical journal article. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 791–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Whitehurst, G. (1984). Interrater agreement for journal manuscript reviews. American Psychologist, 39(1), 22–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Woodford, F. P. (1970). Training professional editors for scientific journals. Scholarly Publishing, 2, 41–46.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCase Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations