Abstract
The problem of monitoring an electric power system by placing as few measurement devices in the system as possible is closely related to the well-known domination problem in graphs. Following a set of rules for power system monitoring, a set S of vertices is defined to be a power dominating set of a graph if every vertex and every edge in the system is monitored by the set S. The minimum cardinality of a power dominating set of G is the power domination number γ p (G). In this paper, we investigate the power domination number for the generalized Petersen graphs, presenting both upper bounds for such graphs and exact results for a subfamily of generalized Petersen graphs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkins D, Haynes TW, Henning MA (2006) Placing monitoring devices in electric power networks modelled by block graphs. ARS Combin 79:129–143
Behzad A, Behzad M, Praeger CE (2008) On the domination number of the generalized Petersen graphs. Discrete Math 308:603–610
Dorbec P, Mollard M, Klavžar S, Špacapan S (2008) Power domination in product graphs. SIAM J Discrete Math 22:554–567
Dorfling M, Henning MA (2006) A note on power domination in grid graphs. Discrete Appl Math 154:1023–1027
Guo J, Niedermeier R, Raible D (2005) Improved algorithms and complexity results for power domination in graphs. In: Lecture notes comput sci, vol 3623. Springer, Berlin, pp 172–184
Fox J, Gera R, Stănică P (2007) The independence number for the generalized Petersen graphs. ARS Combin (accepted)
Haynes TW, Hedetniemi SM, Hedetniemi ST, Henning MA (2002) Domination in graphs applied to electric power networks. SIAM J Discrete Math 15:519–529
Haynes TW, Hedetniemi ST, Slater PJ (1998) Fundamentals of Domination in Graphs. Marcel Dekker, New York
Kneis J, Mölle D, Richter S, Rossmanith P (2006) Parameterized power domination complexity. Inf Process Lett 98:145–149
Liao CS, Lee DT (2005) Power domination problem in graphs. In: Lecture notes comput sci, vol 3595. Springer, Berlin, pp 818–828
Mili L, Baldwin T, Phadke A (1991) Phasor measurement placement for voltage and stability monitoring and control. In: Proceeding of the EPRI-NSF workshop on application of advanced mathematics to power systems. San Franciso, CA
Xu GJ, Kang LY, Shan EF, Zhao M (2006) Power domination in block graphs. Theor Comput Sci 359:299–305
Yan H, Kang LY, Xu GJ (2009) The exact domination number of the generalized Petersen graphs. Discrete Math 309:2596–2607
Wang HL, Xu XR, Yang YS, Lü K (2009) On the distance paired domination of generalized Petersen graphs P(n,1) and P(n,2). J Comb Optim. doi:10.1007/s10878-009-9266-1
Zelinka B (2002) Domination in generalized Petersen graphs. Czechoslovak Math J 52:11–16
Zhao M, Kang LY, Chang GJ (2006) Power domination in graphs. Discrete Math 306:1812–1816
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, G., Kang, L. On the power domination number of the generalized Petersen graphs. J Comb Optim 22, 282–291 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-010-9293-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-010-9293-y