Skip to main content
Log in

On the parameterized complexity of the Multi-MCT and Multi-MCST problems

  • Published:
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The comparison of tree structured data is widespread since trees can be used to represent wide varieties of data, such as XML data, evolutionary histories, or carbohydrate structures. Two graph-theoretical problems used in the comparison of such data are the problems of finding the maximum common subtree (MCT) and the minimum common supertree (MCST) of two trees. These problems generalize to the problem of finding the MCT and MCST of multiple trees (Multi-MCT and Multi-MCST, respectively). In this paper, we prove parameterized complexity hardness results for the different parameterized versions of the Multi-MCT and Multi-MCST problem under isomorphic embeddings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akutsu T (1992) An RNC algorithm for finding a largest common subtree of two trees. IEICE Trans Inf Syst 75(1):95–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Akutsu T, Halldórsson M (2000) On the approximation of largest common subtrees and largest common point sets. Theor Comput Sci 233(1–2):33–50

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Aoki KF, Yamaguchi A, Okuno Y, Akutsu T, Ueda N, Kanehisa M, Mamitsuka H (2003) Efficient tree-matching methods for accurate carbohydrate database queries. Genome Inf 14:134–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodlaender H, Downey R, Fellows M, Hallett M, Wareham H (1995b) Parameterized complexity analysis in computational biology. Comput Appl Biosci 11(1):49–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodlaender HL, Downey RG, Fellows MR, Wareham HT (1995a) The parameterized complexity of sequence alignment and consensus. Theor Comput Sci 147(1–2):31–54

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Downey RG, Fellows MR (1999) Parameterized complexity. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Farach M, Thorup M (1994) Fast comparison of evolutionary trees. In: The fifth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Arlington, pp 481–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellows MR, Hallett MT, Stege U (2003) Analogs and duals of the MAST problem for sequences and trees. J Algorithms 49(1):192–216

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gou G, Chirkova R (2007) Efficiently querying large XML data repositories: a survey. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 19(10):1381–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta A, Nishimura N (1998) Finding largest subtrees and smallest supertrees. Algorithmica 21(2):183–210

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hallett MT (1996) An integrated complexity analysis of problems from computational biology. PhD thesis, University of Victoria

  • Rosselló F, Valiente G (2006) An algebraic view of the relation between largest common subtrees and smallest common supertrees. Theor Comput Sci 362(1–3):33–53

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zaki MJ (2002) Efficiently mining frequent trees in a forest. In: The eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, Edmonton, pp 71–80

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nagiza F. Samatova.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, W., Schmidt, M.C. & Samatova, N.F. On the parameterized complexity of the Multi-MCT and Multi-MCST problems. J Comb Optim 21, 151–158 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-009-9220-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-009-9220-2

Keywords

Navigation