Skip to main content
Log in

Can postoperative deltoid weakness after cervical laminoplasty be prevented by using intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring?

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laminoplasty, frequently performed in patients with cervical myelopathy, is safe and provides relatively good results. However, motor palsy of the upper extremities, which occurs after decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy, often reduces muscle strength of the deltoid muscle, mainly in the C5 myotome. The aim of this study was to investigate prospectively whether postoperative deltoid weakness (DW) can be predicted by performing intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) during cervical laminoplasty and to clarify whether it is possible to prevent palsy using IONM. We evaluated the 278 consecutive patients (175 males and 103 females) who underwent French-door cervical laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy under IONM between November 2008 and December 2016 at our hospital. IONM was performed using muscle evoked potential after electrical stimulation to the brain [Br(E)-MsEP] from the deltoid muscle. Seven patients (2.5%) developed DW after surgery (2 with acute and 5 with delayed onset). In all patients, deltoid muscle strength recovered to ≥ 4 on manual muscle testing 3–6 months after surgery. Persistent IONM alerts occurred in 2 patients with acute-onset DW. To predict the acute onset of DW, Br(E)-MsEP alerts in the deltoid muscle had both a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. The PPV of persistent Br(E)-MsEP alerts had both a sensitivity and specificity of 100% for acute-onset DW. There was no change in Br(E)-MsEP in patients with delayed-onset palsy. The incidence of deltoid palsy was relatively low. Persistent Br(E)-MsEP alerts of the deltoid muscle had a 100% sensitivity and specificity for predicting a postoperative acute deficit. IONM was unable to predict delayed-onset DW. In only 1 patient were we able to prevent postoperative DW by performing a foraminotomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chiba K, Toyama Y, Matsumoto M, et al. Segmental motor paralysis after expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine 2002;27:2018–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y, et al. C5 palsy after decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy: review of the literature. Spine 2003;28:2447–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tsuzuki N, Abe R, Saiki K, et al. Paralysis of the arm after posterior decompression of the cervical spinal cord II: analyses of clinical findings. Eur Spine J. 1993;2:197–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Edwards CC 2nd, Heller JG, Silcox DH 3rd. T-Saw laminoplasty for the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: clinical and radiographic outcome. Spine 2000;25:1788–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ikenaga M, Shikata J, Tanaka C. Radiculopathy of C-5 after anterior decompression for cervical myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;3:210–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shinomiya K, Kurosa Y, Fuchioka M, et al. Clinical study of dissociated motor weakness following anterior cervical decompression surgery. Spine 1989;14:1211–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hosono N, Miwa T, Mukai Y, et al. Potential risk of thermal damage to cervical nerve roots by a high-speed drill. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:1541–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shiozaki T, Otsuka H, Nakata Y, et al. Spinal cord shift on magnetic resonance imaging at 24 hours after cervical laminoplasty. Spine 2009;34:274–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hasegawa K, Homma T, Chiba Y. Upper extremity palsy following cervical decompression surgery results from a transient spinal cord lesion. Spine 2007;32:E197–E202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nash CL, Brodkey JS, Croft TJ. A model for electrical monitoring of spinal cord function in scoliosis patients undergoing correction (abstract). J Bone Joint Surg. 1972;54:197–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tamaki T, Yamashita T, Kobayashi H, et al. Spinal cord evoked potential after stimulation to the spinal cord (SCEP), spinal cord monitoring: basic data obtained from animal experimental studies [in Japanese]. Jpn J Electroencephalogr Electromyogr. 1972;1:196.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kurokawa T. Spinal cord action potentials evoked by epidural stimulation of cord: a report of human and animal records [in Japanese]. Jpn J Electroencephalogr Electromyogr. 1972;1:64–6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Deletis V, Sala F. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord during spinal cord and spine surgery: a review focus on the corticospinal tracts. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119:248–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fan D, Schwartz DM, Vaccaro AR, et al. Intraoperative neurophysiologic detection of iatrogenic C5 nerve root injury during laminectomy for cervical compression myelopathy. Spine 2002;27:2499–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tanaka N, Nakanishi K, Fujiwara Y, et al. Postoperative segmental C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty may occur without intraoperative nerve injury: a prospective study with transcranial electric motor-evoked potentials. Spine 2006;31:3013–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yanase M, Matsuyama Y, Mori K, et al. Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring of C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010;23:170–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakamae T, Tanaka N, Nakanishi K, et al. Investigation of segmental motor paralysis after cervical laminoplasty using intraoperative spinal cord monitoring with transcranial electric motor-evoked potentials. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012;25:92–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fujiwara Y, Manabe H, Izumi B, et al. The efficacy of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring using transcranial electrically stimulated muscle-evoked potentials (TcE-MsEPs) for predicting postoperative segmental upper extremity motor paresis after cervical laminoplasty. Clin Spine Surg. 2016;29:E188-195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Haghighi SS, Blaskiewicz DJ, Ramirez B, et al. Can intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring during cervical spine decompression predict post-operative segmental C5 palsy? J Spine Surg. 2016;2:167–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Oya J, Burke JF, Vogel T, Tay B, et al. The accuracy of multimodality intraoperative neuromonitoring to predict postoperative neurologic deficits following cervical laminoplasty. World Neurosurg. 2017;106:17–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bhalodia VM, Schwartz DM, Sestokas AK, et al. Efficacy of intraoperative monitoring of transcranial electrical stimulation-induced motor evoked potentials and spontaneous electromyography activity to identify acute-versus delayed-onset C-5 nerve root palsy during cervical spine surgery: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19:395–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Matsuda H, Shimazu A. Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring using electric responses to stimulation of caudal spinal cord or motor cortex. In: Desmedt JE, editor. Neuromonitoring in Surgery. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1989. pp. 175–90.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kobayashi S, Matsuyama Y, Shinomiya K, et al. A new alarm point of transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potentials for intraoperative spinal cord monitoring: a prospective multicenter study from the Spinal Cord Monitoring Working Group of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;20:102–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yoshida M, Tamaki T, Kawakami M, et al. Indication and clinical results of laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy caused by disc herniation with developmental canal stenosis. Spine. 1998;23:2391–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Imagama S, Matsuyama Y, Yukawa Y, Nagoya Spine Group, et al. C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty: a multicentre study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010;92:393–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee HJ, Ahn JS, Shin B, et al. C4/5 foraminal stenosis predicts C5 palsy after expansive open-door laminoplasty. Eur Spine J. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5077-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Katsumi K, Yamazaki A, Watanabe K, et al. Can prophylactic bilateral C4/C5 foraminotomy prevent postoperative C5 palsy after open-door laminoplasty?: a prospective study. Spine 2012;37:748–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Langeloo DD, Lelivelt A, Louis Journée H, et al. Transcranial electrical motor-evoked potential monitoring during surgery for spinal deformity: a study of 145 patients. Spine 2003;28:1043–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Lyon R, Zada G, Lamborn KR, et al. Changes in transcranial motor evoked potentials during intramedullary spinal cord tumor resection correlate with postoperative motor function. Neurosurgery. 2005;56:982–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ito Z, Imagama S, Sakai Y, et al. A new criterion for the alarm point for compound muscle action potentials. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;17:348–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tsutsui S, Tamaki T, Yamada H, et al. Relationships between the changes in compound muscle action potentials and selective injuries to the spinal cord and spinal nerve roots. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114:1431–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muneharu Ando.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional committee (Wakayama Rosai Hospital ethics committee) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Additional informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for whom identifying information is included in this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ando, M., Tamaki, T., Matsumoto, T. et al. Can postoperative deltoid weakness after cervical laminoplasty be prevented by using intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring?. J Clin Monit Comput 33, 123–132 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-018-0141-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-018-0141-4

Keywords

Navigation