Advertisement

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 35–40 | Cite as

Automated titration of propofol and remifentanil decreases the anesthesiologist’s workload during vascular or thoracic surgery: a randomized prospective study

  • Corinne Dussaussoy
  • Marine Peres
  • Virginie Jaoul
  • Ngai Liu
  • Thierry Chazot
  • Jean Picquet
  • Marc Fischler
  • Laurent Beydon
Original Research

Abstract

Closed loop target-control infusion systems using a Bispectral (BIS) signal as an input (TCI Loop) can automatically maintain intravenous anesthesia in a BIS range of 40–60 %. Our purpose was to assess to what extent such a system could decrease anesthesia workload in comparison to the use of a stand alone TCI system manually adjusted to fit the same BIS range of 40–60 % (TCI Manual). Patients scheduled for elective vascular or thoracic surgery were randomized to the TCI Loop or TCI Manual method for administering propofol and remifentanil during both induction and maintenance of general anesthesia. Assessment of workload was performed by an independent observer who quoted each time the physician looked at the BIS monitor. The number of propofol and remifentanil target modifications, the percentage of time of adequate anesthesia i.e. BIS in the range 40–60 and hemodynamic data were recorded. Eighteen patients per group were enrolled. Characteristics, duration of surgery and propofol-remifentanil consumption were similar between groups. However, the percentage of time in the BIS range 40–60 % was higher in the TCI Loop versus TCI Manual groups (94 % ± 12 vs. 74 % ± 19, p < 0.001). Mean arterial pressure was lower with TCI Manual (78 ± 6 vs. 88 ± 13 mmHg, p < 0.001). The number of times the anesthesiologist watched the controller or BIS monitor (p < 0.05) and the number of manual adjustments (p < 0.001) performed in each group was lower with TCI Loop group during induction and maintenance of anesthesia. An automated controller strikingly frees the anesthesiologist from manual intervention to adjust drug delivery.

Keywords

Drug delivery systems Pharmacokinetics Anesthesia Intravenous Ergonomics Intravenous drug delivery systems 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been sponsored by the CHU d’Angers. The authors have no financial relationship with this organisation. Ngai Liu and Thierry Chazot have patented in France the algorithm of the closed loop system used in this study (# BFF08P669, Institut National de la Propriété Industrielle). None of the authors has a personal financial interest in this research.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Santiago JV, Clemens AH, Clarke WL, Kipnis DM. Closed-loop and open-loop devices for blood glucose control in normal and diabetic subjects. Diabetes. 1979;28:71–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mortier E, Struys M, De Smet T, Versichelen L, Rolly G. Closed-loop controlled administration of propofol using bispectral analysis. Anaesthesia. 1998;53:749–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morley A, Derrick J, Mainland P, Lee BB, Short TG. Closed loop control of anaesthesia: an assessment of the bispectral index as the target of control. Anaesthesia. 2000;55:953–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Struys MM, De Smet T, Versichelen LF, Van De Velde S, Van den Broecke R, Mortier EP. Comparison of closed-loop controlled administration of propofol using bispectral index as the controlled variable versus “standard practice” controlled administration. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:6–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu N, Chazot T, Genty A, Landais A, Restoux A, McGee K, Laloe PA, Trillat B, Barvais L, Fischler M. Titration of propofol for anesthetic induction and maintenance guided by the bispectral index: closed-loop versus manual control: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:686–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Absalom AR, Kenny GN. Closed-loop control of propofol anaesthesia using bispectral index: performance assessment in patients receiving computer-controlled propofol and manually controlled remifentanil infusions for minor surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2003;90:737–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu N, Chazot T, Trillat B, Pirracchio R, Law-Koune JD, Barvais L, Fischler M. Feasibility of closed-loop titration of propofol guided by the Bispectral Index for general anaesthesia induction: a prospective randomized study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006;23:465–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Weinger MB, Reddy SB. Slagle JM: Multiple measures of anesthesia workload during teaching and nonteaching cases. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:1419–25. Table of contents.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu N, Chazot T, Hamada S, Landais A, Boichut N, Dussaussoy C, Trillat B, Beydon L, Samain E, Sessler DI, Fischler M. Closed-loop coadministration of propofol and remifentanil guided by bispectral index: a randomized multicenter study. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:546–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schnider TW, Minto CF, Shafer SL, Gambus PL, Andresen C, Goodale DB, Youngs EJ. The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:1502–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Minto CF, Schnider TW, Egan TD, Youngs E, Lemmens HJ, Gambus PL, Billard V, Hoke JF, Moore KH, Hermann DJ, Muir KT, Mandema JW, Shafer SL. Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil I. Model development. Anesthesiology. 1997;86:10–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cantraine FR, Coussaert EJ. The first object oriented monitor for intravenous anesthesia. J Clin Monit Comput. 2000;16:3–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jastremski M, Jastremski C, Shepherd M, Friedman V, Porembka D, Smith R, Gonzales E, Swedlow D, Belzberg H, Crass R, et al. A model for technology assessment as applied to closed loop infusion systems. Technology assessment task force of the society of critical care medicine. Crit Care Med. 1995;23:1745–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Beatty PC. Software safety considerations in the use of closed-loop, patient-connected control systems. Br J Anaesth. 1993;71:461–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leedal JM, Smith AF. Methodological approaches to anaesthetists’ workload in the operating theatre. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94:702–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Agarwal J, Puri GD, Mathew PJ. Comparison of closed loop vs. manual administration of propofol using the bispectral index in cardiac surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53:390–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Le Guen M, Liu N, Bourgeois E, Chazot T, Sessler DI, Rouby JJ, Fischler M: Automated sedation outperforms manual administration of propofol and remifentanil in critically ill patients with deep sedation: a randomized phase II trial. Intensive Care Med 2013;39(3):454–62.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Corinne Dussaussoy
    • 1
  • Marine Peres
    • 1
  • Virginie Jaoul
    • 1
  • Ngai Liu
    • 3
    • 4
  • Thierry Chazot
    • 3
  • Jean Picquet
    • 2
  • Marc Fischler
    • 3
  • Laurent Beydon
    • 1
  1. 1.Pôle d’Anesthésie RéanimationCHU d’AngersAngers Cedex 9France
  2. 2.Service de chirurgie vasculaire et thoraciqueCHU d’AngersAngers Cedex 9France
  3. 3.Service d’AnesthésieHôpital FochSuresnesFrance
  4. 4.Outcomes Research ConsortiumClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations