Advertisement

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 149–158 | Cite as

Failure of Two Commercial Indexes and Spectral Parameters to Reflect the Pharmacodynamic Effect of Desflurane on EEG

  • Sascha Kreuer
  • Jörgen Bruhn
  • Richard Ellerkmann
  • Stephan Ziegeler
  • Darius Kubulus
  • Wolfram Wilhelm
Article

Abstract

Objective

We compared two PK/PD models, one with and one without a plateau effect. Bispectral (BIS, Aspect Medical Systems, Natick, MA, version XP) and Narcotrend™ (NCT, MonitorTechnik, Bad Bramstedt, Germany, Version 4.0) indices were used as an electroencephalographic measure of desflurane drug effect.

Methods

With IRB approval and informed consent we investigated 20 adult patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy. At least 45 minutes after induction of general anaesthesia, end-tidal concentrations of desflurane was varied between 3 and 10 vol%. To evaluate the relationship between concentrations and EEG indices, two different pharmacodynamic models were applied: A conventional model based on a single sigmoidal curve, and a novel model based on two sigmoidal curves for BIS and NCT values with and without burst suppression. The parameters of the models␣were estimated by NONMEM V (GloboMax, Hanover, USA) by minimizing log likelihood. Statistical significance between the two models was calculated by the likelihood ratio test.

Results

The maximum end-tidal desflurane concentration during the two concentrations ramps was 10.0 ± 1.4 vol%. The mean BIS and NCT values decreased significantly but slightly with increasing end-tidal desflurane concentrations between 4 and 8 vol%. Therefore a two sigmoidal curves PK/PD model including a plateau describes the effects of desflurane on BIS and Narcotrend better than a single sigmoidal curve model. The difference between the log likelihood values of the new PK/PD model with two connected sigmoidal curves and the classical E max model with one sigmoidal curve is 634 (P < 0.001) for the BIS monitor and 4089 (P < 0.001) for the NCT.

Conclusions

BIS and Narcotrend are not useful to differentiate pharmacodynamic changes in the EEG between 4 and 9 vol% desflurane.

Keywords

bispectral index Narcotrend desflurane pharmacodynamic plateau pharmacodynamic model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This study was solely supported by departmental funding.

References

  1. 1.
    Johansen JW, Sebel PS. Development and clinical application of electroencephalographic bispectrum monitoring. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 1336–1344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rampil IJ. A primer for EEG signal processing in anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 980–1002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schultz B, Kreuer S, Wilhelm W, Grouven U, Schultz A. The Narcotrend monitor. Development and interpretation algorithms. Anaesthesist 2003; 52: 1143–11148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kreuer S, Biedler A, Larsen R, Altmann S, Wilhelm W. Narcotrend monitoring allows faster emergence and a reduction of drug consumption in propofol-remifentanil anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2003; 99: 34–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kreuer S, Bruhn J, Larsen R, Bialas P, Wilhelm W. Comparability of Narcotrend index and bispectral index during propofol anesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2004; 93: 235–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilhelm W, Kreuer S, Larsen R. Narcotrend EEG monitoring during total intravenous anaesthesia in 4.630 patients. Anaesthesist 2002; 51: 980–988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kreuer S, Bruhn J, Larsen R, Grundmann U, Wilhelm W. Application of Narcotrend index and bispectral index to the measurement of the EEG effects of isoflurane with and without burst suppression. Anesthesiology 2004; 101: 847–854PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kreuer S, Bruhn J, Walter E, Larsen R, Apfel CC, Grundmann U, Biedler A, Wilhelm W. Comparative pharmacodynamic modeling using bispectral - and Narcotrend-index with and without a pharmacodynamic plateau during sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2008:106(4)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hill AV. The possible effect of the aggregration of the molecules of hemoglobin on its dissociation curves. J Physiol 1910; 40: iv–viiGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shafer SL. Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic analysis with NONMEM—basic concepts. Workshop, Palo Alto, California, USA, 9.17.2004Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schnider TW, Minto CF, Shafer SL, Gambus PL, Andresen C, Goodale DB, Youngs EJ. The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 1502–1516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bruhn J, Bouillon T, Shafer SL. The onset of propofol-induced burst suppression may be correctly detected by approximate entropy but not by the bispectral index. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 505–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rehberg B, Bouillon T, Zinserling J, Hoeft A. Comparative pharmacodynamic modeling of the electroencephalography-slowing effect of isoflurane, sevoflurane, and desflurane. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 397–405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sheiner LB, Stanski DR, Vozeh S, Miller RD, Ham J. Simultaneous modeling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: application to d-tubocurarine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1979; 25: 358–371PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ellerkmann RK, Kreuer S, Wilhelm W, Ropcke H, Hoeft A, Bruhn J. Reduction in anaesthetic drug consumption is correlated with mean titrated intra-operative bispectral index values. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006; 50: 1244–1249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kreuer S, Bruhn J, Stracke C, Aniset L, Silomon M, Larsen R, Wilhelm W. Narcotrend or bispectral index monitoring during desflurane-remifentanil anesthesia: a comparison with a standard practice protocol. Anesth Analg 2005; 101: 427–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yli-Hankala A, Vakkuri A, Annila P, Korttila K. EEG bispectral index monitoring in sevoflurane or propofol anaesthesia: analysis of direct costs and immediate recovery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1999; 43: 545–549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wong J, Song D, Blanshard H, Grady D, Chung F. Titration of isoflurane using BIS index improves early recovery of elderly patients undergoing orthopaedic surgeries. Can J Anesth 2002; 49: 13–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kreuer S, Wilhelm W. The Narcotrend monitor. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2006; 20:111–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Katoh T, Suzuki A, Ikeda K. Electroencephalographic derivatives as a tool for predicting the dpeth of sedation and anaesthesia induced by sevoflurane. Anesthesiology 1998; 88: 642–650PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Olofsen E, Dahan A. The dynamic relationship between end-tidal sevoflurane and isoflurane concentrations and bispectral index and spectral edge frequence of the electroencephalogram. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 1345–1353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sascha Kreuer
    • 1
  • Jörgen Bruhn
    • 2
  • Richard Ellerkmann
    • 3
  • Stephan Ziegeler
    • 1
  • Darius Kubulus
    • 1
  • Wolfram Wilhelm
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care MedicineUniversity of Saarland Homburg/Saar, SaarlandGermany
  2. 2.Department of AnaesthesiologyNijmegenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care MedicineUniversity of BonnBonnGermany
  4. 4.Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care MedicineSt.-Marien-HospitalLuenenGermany

Personalised recommendations