Life with a Primary Immune Deficiency: a Systematic Synthesis of the Literature and Proposed Research Agenda
- 302 Downloads
The clinical immunology literature is punctuated with research on psychosocial dimensions of illness. Studies investigating the lived experiences and stated needs of patients with primary immune deficiencies and their families are essential to improving clinical management and determining the research questions that matter to patients and other stakeholders. Yet, to move the field forward, a systematic review of literature and proposed agenda is needed.
A systematic review was conducted via PubMed and Scopus to include original research on psychological, social, or behavioral aspects of primary immune deficiencies published between 1999 and 2015. A Title/Abstract keyword search was conducted, 317 candidate article abstracts were manually reviewed, and forward/backward reference searches were completed.
Twenty-nine studies met inclusion criteria. These illuminate the complex psychological, social, and emotional experiences of primary immune deficiency. Themes included the potential for negative psychosocial impact from disease; adaptation over time; the multi-dimensional assessments of quality of life; familial impact; the important roles of hope, developing a sense of control, social support; and addressing anxiety/depression in our patients and their families. Methodological considerations and areas for improvement are discussed.
We propose the research agenda focus on study creativity and rigor, with improved engagement with existing literature and critical study design (e.g., methodology with adequate statistical power, careful variable selection, etc.). This review highlights opportunities to advance psychosocial research and bring a brighter future to clinicians, researchers, and families affected by primary immune deficiency.
KeywordsQuality of life psychosocial primary immune deficiency patient-centered
Steven M. Holland for input on draft and Joie Davis for thoughtful discussion.
This project has been funded in whole or in part with federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, under Contract No. HHSN261200800001E. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
- 2.van Dijk S, Timmermans DR, Meijers-Heijboer H, Tibben A, van Asperen CJ, Otten W. Clinical characteristics affect the impact of an uninformative DNA test result: the course of worry and distress experienced by women who apply for genetic testing for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(22):3672–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Wang JH, Schwartz MD, Brown RL, Maxwell AE, Lee MM, Adams IF, et al. Results of a randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of a culturally targeted and a generic video on mammography screening among chinese-american immigrants. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21(11):1923–32.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Joseph G, Beattie MS, Lee R, Braithwaite D, Wilcox C, Metrikin M, et al. Pre-counseling education for low literacy women at risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC): patient experiences using the Cancer Risk Education Intervention Tool (CREdIT). J Genet Couns. 2010;19(5):447–62.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Furlong P, Bridges JF, Charnas L, Fallon JR, Fischer R, Flanigan KM, et al. How a patient advocacy group developed the first proposed draft guidance document for industry for submission to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2015;10:82.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Giacomini MK, Cook DJ. User’s guides to the medical literature. J Am Med Assoc. 2000;284:478–82.Google Scholar
- 18.Piazza-Waggoner C, Aggoner C, Adams CD, Muchant D, Wilson N, Hogan MB. Children ’ s Health care children with primary immunodeficiency disorders : family functioning, coping strategies, and behavioral functioning. Children’s Health Care. 2010:37–41.Google Scholar
- 20.Ca J, Hadley DW, Na H, Ja W. How does the mode of inheritance of a genetic condition influence families? A study of guilt, blame, stigma, and understanding of inheritance and reproductive risks in families with X-linked and autosomal recessive diseases. Genet Med. 2006;8:234–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Stephenson DD, Beaton E, Weems CF, Angkustsiri K, Simon TJ. Identifying patterns of anxiety and depression in children with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: comorbidity predicts behavioral difficulties and impaired functional communications. Behav Brain Res. 2014;276:190–8.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Jörgensen GH, Gardulf A, Sigurdsson MI, Arnlaugsson S, Hammarström L, Ludviksson BR. Health-related quality of life (HRQL) in immunodeficient adults with selective IgA deficiency compared with age- and gender-matched controls and identification of risk factors for poor HRQL. Qual Life Res: Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehabil. 2014;23:645–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Cohen JS, Biesecker BB. Quality of life in rare genetic conditions: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Med Genet A. 2010:1136–56.Google Scholar
- 45.Cole T, McKendrick F, Titman P, Cant AJ, Pearce MS, Cale CM, et al. Health related quality of life and emotional health in children with chronic granulomatous disease: a comparison of those managed conservatively with those that have undergone haematopoietic stem cell transplant. J Clin Immunol. 2013;33:8–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 48.Lazarus R, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. 1984.Google Scholar