Advertisement

Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry

, Volume 73, Issue 1, pp 101–118 | Cite as

Analysis of bulk precipitation chemistry in Serbia for the period from 1982 to 2010

  • Dragana Vujović
  • Biljana Milić-Petrović
Article

Abstract

Bulk precipitation samples collected daily through bulk collectors at eight meteorological stations in Serbia were analyzed for their chemical composition. The data covers time series, from 20 to 28 years, in the period between 1982 and 2010. The most abundant ion in the samples was sulfate. Only 0.17 % of all samples were from strong acid rains (pH < 3.5). The relatively high average pH values (5.94–6.26) of the collected precipitation indicate the neutral or alkaline nature of local rainwater. Trends in both the annual amount and the composition of precipitation were tested by the nonparametric Mann–Kendall test and Sen’s slope estimator. Significant increasing trend of precipitation was identified for almost all stations. Rebuilding activities after the bombing of Serbia in 1999 were identified as a possible anthropogenic cause of the sharp increase of some ions (Ca2+) in the first year following the bombing. The origin of air masses arriving at one particular station was examined using two-dimensional backward trajectories. Western sectors (W, SW and NW) accounted for almost half (44.3 %) of all rainy days, while eastern sectors (SE, E and NE) brought only 10.4 % of all rainy days. The distribution, per sector, of volume-weighted concentrations of sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, calcium, potassium, magnesium, chloride and sodium ions, as well as the amount of precipitation and its pH values for one station, was also analyzed. Rainwater from the SE and S sectors was the most polluted.

Keywords

Precipitation chemistry Bulk precipitation sampling Long-range transport Time series of ions Trends 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions. Furthermore, we are grateful to Mr. Nedeljko Todorović for his initial idea for this study. The Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technology Development supported this study partly under Grant 176013.

References

  1. AEP: Report on the environmental situation in the Republic of Serbia in 2011 year. Agency of Environmental Protection, Ministry of Energy, Development and the Environment, pp.193. Belgrade (2012)Google Scholar
  2. Aiuppa A., Bonfanti P., D’Alessandro W.: Rainwater chemistry at Mt. Etna (Italy): Natural and Anthropogenic Sources of Major Ions. J. Atmos. Chem. 46, 89–102 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Momani I.F., Gullu G., Olmez I., Eler U., Ortel E., Sirin G., Tuncel G.: Chemical composition of eastern Mediterranean aerosol and precipitation: indications of long-range transport. Pure Appl. Chem. 69(1), 41–46 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrić, Lj.: Preparation of non–metals in Serbia, Chapter in the monography "Situation and Prospects of Mineral Processing in Serbia", Engineering Academy of Serbia, ISBN 978-86-7747-430-0 (MU), pp. 39–60. Belgrade (2011)Google Scholar
  5. Bjørge, D., Skålin, R.: PARLAM–the parallel HIRLAM version at DNMI. Research Report No. 27, ISSN 0332–9879, Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo (1995)Google Scholar
  6. Charlson R.J., Rodhe H.: Factors controlling the acidity of natural rainwater. Nature. 295, 683–685 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. EMEP: EMEP manual for sampling and chemical analysis, EMEP/CCC–report 1/95, Norwegian institute for air research, pp. 303 (2001)Google Scholar
  8. Freyer H.D., Kley D., Volz-Thomas A., Kobel K.: On the interaction of isotopic exchange processes with photochemical reactions in atmospheric oxides of nitrogen. J. Geophys. Res. 98, 14791–14796 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. GAW: Manual for the GAW Precipitation Chemistry Programme, WMO, pp. 174 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. Gilbert, R.O.: Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring. John Willey&Sons, pp. 336 (1987)Google Scholar
  11. Gocić M., Trajković S.: Spatio–temporal patterns of precipitation in Serbia. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 117(3–4), 419–431 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. Golobočanin D., Žujić A., Milenković A., Miljević N.: Precipitation composition and wet deposition temporal pattern in central Serbia for the period from 1998 to 2004. Environ. Monit. Assess. 142, 185–198 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grønås, S., Hellevik, O.: A limited area prediction modell at The Norwegian Meteorological Institute. Technical Report No. 61 DNMI, Oslo (1982).Google Scholar
  14. Junge C.E., Gustafson P.E.: On the distribution of sea salt over the United States and its removal by precipitation. Tellus IX. 2, 164–173 (1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marquardt W., Bruggemann E., Auel R., Herrmann H., Moller D.: Trends of pollution in rain over east Germany caused by changing emissions. Tellus. 53B, 529–545 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Menz F.C., Seip H.M.: Acid rain in Europe and the United States: an update. Environ. Sci. Pol. 7, 253–265 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mouli P.C., Mohan S.V., Reddy S.J.: Rainwater chemistry at a regional representative urban site: influence of terrestrial sources on ionic composition. Atmos. Environ. 39, 999–1008 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Munger J.W., Eisenreich S.J.: Continental–scale variations in precipitation chemistry. Env. Sci. Technol. 17, 32A–42A (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nordeng, T.E.: Parameterization of physical processes in a three–dimensional numerical weather prediction model. Technical Report No. 66 DNMI, Oslo (1986)Google Scholar
  20. Okay C., Akkoyunly B.O., Tayanc M.: Composition of wet deposition in kaynarca. Turk. Environ. Pollut. 118, 401–410 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Palmen, E., Newton, C.W.: Atmospheric Circulation Systems, International Geophysics Series, Vol. 13, pp. 603 Academic Press, (1969)Google Scholar
  22. Polkowska Z., Gorecki T., Namiesnik J.: Determination of atmospheric pollutants in wet deposition. Environ. Rev. 19, 185–213 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Russell K.M., Galloway J.N., Macko S.A., Moody J.L., Scudlark J.R.: Sources of nitrogen in wet deposition to the Chesapeake bay region. Atmos. Environ. 32, 2453–2465 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sakihama H., Ishiki M., Tokuyama A.: Chemical characteristics of precipitation in Okinawa island. Jpn. Atm. Environ. 42, 2320–2335 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Salmi T., Maataa A., Antilla P., Ruoho-Airola T., Amnell T.: Detecting trends of annual values of atmospheric pollutants by the Mann-Kendall test and Sen’s slope estimates–the Excel template application MAKESENES. Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki 31 pp (2002)Google Scholar
  26. Salve P.R., Gobre T., Lohkare H., Krupadam R.J., Bansiwal A., Ramteke D.S., Wate S.R.: Source identification and variation in the chemical composition of rainwater at coastal and industrial areas of India. J. Atmos. Chem. 68, 183–198 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Satyanarayana J., Reddy L.A.K., Kulshrestha M.J., Rao R.N., Kulshrestha U.C.: Chemical composition of rain water and influence of airmass trajectories at a rural site in an ecological sensitive area of western Ghats (India). J. Atmos. Chem. 66, 101–116 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schuurkes J., Maenen M., Roelofs J.: Chemical characteristics of precipitation in NH3 affected areas. Atmos. Environ. 22, 1689–1698 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Simmonds P.G., Seuring S., Nickless G., Derwent R.G.: Segregation and interpretation of osone and carbon monoxide measurements by air mass origin at the TOR station mace head, Ireland from 1987 to 1995. J. Atmos. Chem. 28, 45–59 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Škrbić B., Nedeljković J., Miljević N.: Mobility of heavy metals originating from bombing of industrial sites. J. Environ. Sci. Heal. A37, 7–16 (2002)Google Scholar
  31. Špoler Čanić K., Vidič S., Bencetić Klaić Z.: Precipitation chemistry in Croatia during the period 1981–2006. J. Environ. Monitor. 11, 839–851 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Staelens J., Schrijver A.D., Avermaet P.V., Genouw G., Verhoest N.: A comparison of bulk and wet-only deposition at two adjacent sites in melle (Belgium). Atmos. Environ. 39, 7–15 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stosić, M.: Country pasture/forage resource profiles, Serbia and Montentegro. Available from: www.fao.org/ag/AGP/AGPC/doc/Counprof/serbiamontenegro/serbiamont.htm#1a (2006)
  34. SY SCG: Statistical yearbook of Serbia and Montenegro, ISSN 1451–6632, pp. 504 (2003)Google Scholar
  35. Vestreng V., Myhre G., Fagerli H., Reis S., Tarrason L.: Twenty-five years of continuous sulphur dioxide emission reduction in Europe. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 7, 3663–3681 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vujović D., Vučković V., Ćurić M.: Effect of topography on sulfate redistribution in cumulonimbus cloud development. Env. Sci. Poll. Res. 21, 3415–3426 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xiao, H-W., Xiao, H-Y., Long, A-M., Wang, Y-L., Liu, C-Q.: Chemical composition and source apportionment of rainwater at Guiyang, SW China. J. Atmos. Chem. 70:269–281 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang Y., Kang S., Li C., Cong Z., Zhang Q.: Wet deposition of precipitation chemistry during 2005–2009 at a remote site (Nam Co station) in central Tibetan plateau. J. Atmos. Chem. 69, 187–200 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Physics, Department of MeteorologyUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia
  2. 2.Hydrometeorological Service of SerbiaBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations