Advertisement

Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry

, Volume 59, Issue 2, pp 83–98 | Cite as

Emissions of ammonia from weeping wall stores and earth-banked lagoons determined using passive sampling and atmospheric dispersion modelling

  • R. A. Hill
  • K. Smith
  • K. Russell
  • T. Misselbrook
  • S. Brookman
Article

Abstract

Ammonia emissions from stored farm manures form a small but significant proportion (∼10%) of the total emitted annually from UK sources. These emissions are regulated by factors including: the surface area of the store; the storage method; the physical form of the stored manure and the source of manure. A method was developed to estimate in situ emissions from a range of store types (weeping wall and earth-banked lagoon) that are currently under-represented in UK emissions estimates. Passive diffusion samplers (Willems Badges) were used to determine vertical concentration profiles to a height of 4.5 m at a number of locations around each slurry store. An atmospheric dispersion model was applied to estimate the contribution from emissions from other on-farm ammonia sources to the measured data and also to determine the emission rates from the stored manure. A procedure was applied whereby the emission rates from each source were allowed to vary and a numerical equation solver was applied to backfit the modelled data set to the field measurements. Measurements were collected at four farms on a monthly basis throughout the year, with each dataset being collected over 24 h. The uncertainties in the estimates of emissions from the slurry stores during individual measurement periods typically ranged between 20–40% though higher uncertainties occurred when emission fluxes from the stores were below 0.25 g NH3–N m−2 day−1 and were entrained in the wakes, and mixed with the emissions, of adjacent buildings. The average emission from the farms was 0.6 g NH3–N m−2 day−1 which agrees with other recent data on ammonia emissions from crusted slurry stores and, though it is within the range of data considered in the UK emissions inventory, suggests that emissions from weeping wall stores and earth-banked lagoons may be currently overestimated in national predictions.

Keywords

Air pollution Agriculture Back-calculation Gaussian plume Nitrogen 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affair (DEFRA) for funding this project (WA0717). The following people have also contributed to this work: Steven Bailey, Helen Clayton, Trevor Cumby, Bob Jackson, Richard Johnson, Nick Nicholson, Elia Nigro, Sheila Royle and Adrian Williams. The authors would like to thank Professor Roger Timmis for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

References

  1. Carruthers, D.J., Holroyd, R.J., Hunt, J.C.R., Weng, W.S., Robins, A.G., Apsley, D.D., Thomson, D.J., Smith, F.B.: UK-ADMS: a new approach to modelling dispersion in the Earth’s atmospheric boundary layer. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 52, 139–153 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. EC: Directive 2001/81/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on national emission ceilings for certain atmospheric pollutants, Official Journal of the European Communities, L 309/22 (2001)Google Scholar
  3. Flesch, T.K., Wilson, J.D., Harper, L.A., Crenna, B.P.: Estimating gas emissions from a farm with an inverse-dispersion technique. Atmos. Environ. 39, 4863–4974 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fowler, D., Pitcairn, C.E.R., Sutton, M.A., Flechard, C., Loubet, B., Coyle, M., Munro, R.C.: The mass budget of atmospheric ammonia in woodland within 1 km of livestock buildings. Environ. Pollut. 102(S1), 343–348 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hill, R.A.: Emission, dispersion and local deposition of ammonia volatilised from farm buildings and following the application of cattle slurry to grasslands. Ph.D. thesis, University of Plymouth (2000)Google Scholar
  6. Hill, R.A., Parkinson, R.J., Pain, B.F., Phillips, V.R., Lowles, I.: Evaluation of the UK-ADMS buildings effects module using data on the near-field dispersion of ammonia at an intensive dairy farm. In: Proceedings of the seventh international conference on harmonisation within atmospheric dispersion modelling for regulatory purposes. Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Italy pp. 239–243 (2001)Google Scholar
  7. Irwin, J.S., Carruthers, D., Paumier, J., Stocker, J.: Application of ASTM D6589 to evaluate dispersion model performance to simulate average centreline concentration values. In: Batchvarova, E., Syrakov, D., (eds.) Proceedings of the eight international conference on harmonisation within atmospheric dispersion modelling for regulatory purposes, pp. 53–57. Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria (2003)Google Scholar
  8. McInnes, K.J., Kissel, D.E., Kanemasu, E.T.: Estimating ammonia flux: a comparison between the integrated horizontal flux method and theoretical solutions of the diffusion profile. Agron. J. 77, 884–889 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Misselbrook, T.H., Van Der Weerden, T.J., Pain, B.F., Jarvis, S.C., Chambers, B.J., Smith, K.A., Phillips, V.R., Demmers, T.G.M.: Ammonia emission factors for UK agriculture. Atmos. Environ. 34(6), 871–880 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pain, B.F., Van Der Weerden, T.J., Chambers, B.J., Phillips V.R., Jarvis, S.C.: A new inventory for ammonia emissions from agriculture. Atmos. Environ. 32(3), 309–313 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Phillips, V.R., Scholtens, R., Lee, D.S., Garland J.A., Sneath R.W.: A review of methods for measuring emission rates of ammonia from livestock buildings and slurry or manure stores, part 1: assessment of basic approaches. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 77(4), 355–364 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Phillips, V.R., Lee, D.S., Scholtens, R., Garland J.A., Sneath R.W.: A review of methods for measuring emission rates of ammonia from livestock buildings and slurry or manure stores, part 2: monitoring flux rates, concentrations and airflow rates. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 78(1), 1–14 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Smith, K.A., Brewer, A.J., Crabb, J., Dauven A.: A survey of the production and use of animal manures in England and Wales. III. Cattle manures. Soil Use Manage. 17, 77–87 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Smith, K.A., Brookman, S.K.E, Cumby, T., Lapworth, J., Misselbrook, T.H., Nigro, E., Williams, A.G.: Natural crusting of slurry storage as an abatement measure for ammonia emissions on dairy farms. In: Vol I. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the FAO ESCORENA Network on Recycling of Agricultural, Municipal and Industrial Residues in Agriculture, RAMIRAN, Murcia Spain, pp. 309–312 (2004)Google Scholar
  15. Sommer, S.G., Olesen, J.E., Christensen, B.T.: Effects of temperature, wind speed, and air humidity on ammonia volatilisation from surface applied cattle slurry. J. Agric. Sci. Cambridge 117, 91–100 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sommer, S.G., Sibbesen, E., Nielsen, T., Schorring J.K., Olesen J.E.: A passive flux sampler for measuring ammonia volatilisation from manure storage facilities. J. Environ. Qual. 25, 241–247 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Willems, J.J.H.: A passive monitor for measuring ammonia. In: Proceedings of a Field Intercomparison Exercise on Ammonia Measurement, Organised by CEE and the CNR-institute, Rome 1990. CEE-Air Pollution Research Report 37 (1990)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. A. Hill
    • 1
  • K. Smith
    • 2
  • K. Russell
    • 2
  • T. Misselbrook
    • 3
  • S. Brookman
    • 3
  1. 1.Westlakes Research InstituteMoor RowUK
  2. 2.ADASWoodthorneUK
  3. 3.IGER, North Wyke Research StationOkehamptonUK

Personalised recommendations