Advertisement

Journal of Oceanography

, Volume 69, Issue 3, pp 329–338 | Cite as

Assessment of mixed layer models embedded in an ocean general circulation model

  • Michio Watanabe
  • Toshiyuki Hibiya
Original Article

Abstract

The atmospheric mixed layer obtained using the Mellor–Yamada model grows slower and becomes shallower than observed, which motivated Nakanishi and Niino (J Meteorol Soc Jpn 87:895–912, 2009) to present a modified version of the Mellor–Yamada model. In this study, incorporating each of the Mellor–Yamada and the Nakanishi–Niino models into an ocean general circulation model, we evaluate its performance in the ocean. Comparing the numerical results with the observed ones in the western North Pacific, the Nakanishi–Niino model is shown to exhibit a better performance than the Mellor–Yamada model under strong wind forcing and sea surface cooling during winter and after passage of typhoons during summer.

Keywords

Turbulence, diffusivity and mixing processes Surface mixed layer Near inertial oscillation Numerical modeling 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Furuichi of the National Institute for Environmental Studies for helpful discussions and the two anonymous reviewers for their invaluable comments and suggestions which have significantly improved this manuscript. This research was supported by the Innovative Program of Climate Change Projection for the Twenty-First Century (KAKUSHIN program). The numerical experiments were carried out using the Earth Simulator under support of the Independent Administrative Institution, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC).

References

  1. Boyer TP, Stephens C, Antonov JI, Conkright ME, Locarnini RA, O’Brien TD, Garcia HE (2002) World Ocean Atlas 2001, 2, Salinity, NOAA Atlas NESDIS 50. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Dillon TM (1982) Vertical overturns: a comparison of Thorpe and Ozmidov length scales. J Geophys Res 87:9601–9613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Furuichi N, Hibiya T, Niwa Y (2012) Assessment of turbulence closure models for resonant inertial response in the oceanic mixed layer using a large eddy simulation model. J Oceanogr 68. doi: 10.1007/s10872-011-0095-3
  4. Galperin B, Rosati A, Kantha LH, Mellor GL (1989) Modeling rotating stratified turbulent flows with application to oceanic mixed layers. J Phys Oceanogr 19:901–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Griffies SM, Hallberg RW (2000) Biharmonic friction with a Smagorinsky-like viscosity for use in large-scale eddy-permitting ocean models. Mon Weather Rev 128:2935–2946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hosoda S, Ohira T, Nakamura T (2008) A monthly mean dataset of global oceanic temperature and salinity derived from Argo float observations. JAMSTEC Rep Res Dev 8:47–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hosoda S, Ohira T, Sato K, Suga T (2010) Improved description of global mixed-layer depth using Argo profiling floats. J Oceanogr 66:773–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Iwamaru H, Kobashi F, Iwasaka N (2010) Temporal variations of the winter mixed layer south of the Kuroshio Extension. J Oceanogr 66:147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jerlov NG (1968) Optical oceanography. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  10. Large WG, Crawford GB (1995) Observations and simulations of upper-ocean response to wind events during the Ocean Storms Experiment. J Phys Oceanogr 25:2831–2852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Large WG, Pond S (1981) Open ocean momentum flux measurements in moderate to strong winds. J Phys Oceanogr 11:324–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Large WG, Pond S (1982) Sensible and latent heat flux measurements over the ocean. J Phys Oceanogr 12:464–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Marshall J, Hill C, Perelman L, Adcroft A (1997) Hydrostatic, quasi-hydrostatic, and nonhydrostatic ocean modeling. J Geophys Res 102:5733–5752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mellor GL (2001) One-dimensional, ocean surface layer modeling: a problem and a solution. J Phys Oceanogr 31:790–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mellor GL, Yamada T (1982) Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems. Rev Geophys Space Phys 20:851–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nakanishi M (2001) Improvement of the Mellor–Yamada turbulence closure model based on large-eddy simulation data. Bound Layer Meteorol 99:349–378. doi: 10.1023/A:1018915827400 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nakanishi M, Niino H (2009) Development of an improved turbulence closure model for the atmospheric boundary layer. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 87:895–912. doi: 10.2151/jmsj.87.895 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. National Geophysical Data Center (2006) ETOPO2v2 global gridded 2-minute database. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/global/etopo2.html
  19. Niwa Y, Hibiya T (1999) Response of the deep ocean internal wave field to traveling midlatitude storms as observed in long-term current measurements. J Geophys Res 104:10981–10989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ohno Y, Iwasaka N, Kobashi F, Sato Y (2009) Mixed layer depth climatology of the North Pacific based on Argo observations. J Oceanogr 65:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oka E (2009) Seasonal and interannual variation of North Pacific Subtropical Mode Water in 2003–2006. J Oceanogr 65:151–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Onogi K, Tsutsui J, Koide H, Sakamoto M, Kobayashi S, Hatsushika H, Matsumoto T, Yamazaki N, Kamahori H, Takahashi K, Kadokura S, Wada K, Kato K, Oyama R, Ose T, Mannoji N, Taira R (2007) The JRA-25 reanalysis. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 85:369–432. doi: 10.2151/jmsj.85.369 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Orlanski I (1976) A simple boundary condition for unbounded hyperbolic flows. J Comput Phys 21:251–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Paulson CA, Simpson JJ (1977) Irradiance measurements in the upper ocean. J Phys Oceanogr 7:952–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Skyllingstad ED, Smyth WD, Crawford GB (2000) Resonant wind-driven mixing in the ocean boundary layer. J Phys Oceanogr 30:1866–1890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stephens C, Antonov JI, Boyer TP, Conkright ME, Locarnini RA, O’Brien TD, Garcia HE (2002) World Ocean Atlas 2001, 1, Temperature, NOAA Atlas NESDIS 49. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  27. Suga T, Hanawa K (1990) The mixed-layer climatology in the northwestern part of the North Pacific subtropical gyre and the formation area of Subtropical Mode Water. J Mar Res 48:543–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Watanabe M, Hibiya T, Enomoto T (2005) Comment on ‘Improved global maps and 54-year history of wind-work on ocean inertial motions’ by M. H. Alford—Time aliasing in estimating the wind-induced inertial energy. Geophys Res Lett 32. doi: 10.1029/2005GL022367
  29. Zedler SE, Dickey TD, Doney SC, Price JF, Yu X, Mellor GL (2002) Analysis and simulations of upper ocean’s response to Hurricane Felix at the Bermuda Testbed Mooring site: 13–23 August 1995. J Geophys Res 107. doi: 10.1029/2001JC000969

Copyright information

© The Oceanographic Society of Japan and Springer Japan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Graduate School of ScienceThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Research Institute for Global ChangeJapan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and TechnologyYokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations