Advertisement

Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 373–386 | Cite as

Employee Attachment: Implications for Supervisor Trustworthiness and Trust

  • M. Lance Frazier
  • Janaki Gooty
  • Laura M. Little
  • Debra L. Nelson
Article

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of adult attachment on perceptions of trustworthiness and trust in one’s supervisor. Specifically, we cast trustworthiness perceptions as the cognitive mechanisms by which attachment influences trust, which then influenced work outcomes.

Design/methodology/approach

Data on attachment, trustworthiness, and trust were obtained from employees, and performance ratings were provided by the employees’ direct supervisor (n = 353, 157 supervisors).

Findings

Secure and counterdependent attachment had a significant impact on trustworthiness perceptions, and secure attachment was also significantly related to trust, even in the presence of trustworthiness perceptions. Overdependent attachment had no significant influence on trustworthiness or trust perceptions.

Implications

Adult attachment influences one’s regulatory processes in interpersonal relationships and will certainly influence trust in one’s supervisor. Understanding the process by which attachment influences trust in one’s supervisor via trustworthiness perceptions provides a more comprehensive picture of how trust develops. This study provides evidence that adult attachment influences trustworthiness and trust simultaneously, which may be helpful in the selection process but also in managing the interpersonal aspect of the employee–supervisor relationship.

Originality/value

Though trust has been linked to attachment in the literature, no research has examined adult attachment and its influence on trustworthiness perceptions. Our paper provides an examination of attachment and its role in a comprehensive model of interpersonal trust. In addition, we examine attachments influence on trustworthiness and trust beyond the influence of propensity to trust, a commonly studied dispositional variable in the trust literature.

Keywords

Attachment theory Trust Trustworthiness Performance 

References

  1. Ainsworth, M., & Bowlby, J. (1991). An ethological approach to personality development. American Psychologist, 46, 333–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aryee, S., Budhwar, P. S., & Chen, Z. X. (2002). Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin, M. W., & Fehr, B. (1995). On the instability of attachment style ratings. Personal Relationships, 2, 247–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226–244.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Retrospect and prospect. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52, 664–678.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base parent–child attachment and healthy human development. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult romantic attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  9. Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 644–663.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., Piccolo, R. F., Zapata, C. P., & Rich, B. L. (2012). Explaining the justice–performance relationship: Trust as exchange deepener or uncertainty reducer? Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 1–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 902–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cozzarelli, C., Hoekstra, S. J., & Bylsma, W. H. (2000). General versus specific mental models of attachment: Are they associated with different outcomes? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 605–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Tan, H. H. (2000). The trusted general manager and business unit performance: Empirical evidence of a competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 563–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611–628.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dozier, M., & Kobak, R. (1992). Psychophysiology in attachment interviews: Converging evidence for deactivating strategies. Child Development, 63, 1473–1480.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Feeney, J. A., & Noller, P. (1992). Attachment style and romantic love: Relationship dissolution. Australian Journal of Psychology, 44, 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fraley, R., Garner, J., & Shaver, P. (2000). Adult attachment and the defensive regulation of attention and memory: Examining the role of preemptive and postemptive defensive processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 816.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fraley, R. C., Niedenthal, P. M., Marks, M. J., Brumbaugh, C. C., & Vicary, A. (2006). Adult attachment and the perception of emotional expressions: Probing the hyperactivating strategies underlying anxious attachment. Journal of Personality, 74, 1163–1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fraley, R. C., & Waller, N. G. (1998). Adult attachment patterns: A test of the typological model. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 77–114). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  20. Frazier, M. L., Johnson, P. D., & Bolton, J. F. (2007). Attachment at work questionnaire: Development of a scale. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  21. Frazier, M. L., Johnson, P. D., Gavin, M. B., Gooty, J., & Snow, D. B. (2010). Organizational justice, trustworthiness, and trust: A multifoci examination. Group and Organization Management, 35, 39–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gillath, O., Hart, J., Noftle, E. E., & Stockdale, G. D. (2009). Development and validation of a State Adult Attachment Measure (SAAM). Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 362–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gillath, O., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Effects of attachment style and relationship context on selection among relational strategies. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 968–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gosserand, R. H., & Diefendorff, J. M. (2005). Emotional display rules and emotional labor: The moderating role of commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1256–1264.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Grant, M. A., & Mayer, M. D. (2009). Good soldiers and good actors: Prosocial and impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 900–912.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Harms, P. D. (2011). Adult attachment in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 285–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1990). Love and work: An attachment-theoretical perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1–12.Google Scholar
  29. Holmes, J. (2002). Interpersonal expectations as the building blocks of social cognition: An interdependence theory perspective. Personal Relationships, 9, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Joplin, J., Nelson, D., & Quick, J. (1999). Attachment behavior and health: Relationships at work and home. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 783–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kahn, W. (1994). Organizational change and the provision of a secure base: Lessons from the field. Human Relations, 48, 489–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kee, H. W., & Knox, R. E. (1970). Conceptual and methodological considerations in the study of trust. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 14, 357–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Keller, T. (2003). Parental images as a guide to leadership sensemaking: An attachment perspective on implicit leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569–598.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Little, L. M., Nelson, D. L., Wallace, J. C., & Johnson, P. D. (2011). Integrating attachment style, vigor at work, and extra-role performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 464–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Luke, M. A., Maio, G. R., & Carnelley, K. B. (2004). Attachment models of the self and others: Relations with self-esteem, humanity-esteem, and parental treatment. Personal Relationships, 11, 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martins, L. L., Eddleston, K. A., & Veiga, J. F. (2002). Moderators of the relationship between work–family conflict and career satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 399–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mayer, R., Davis, J., & Schoorman, F. (1995). An integration model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–735.Google Scholar
  40. Mayer, R., & Gavin, M. (2005). Trust in management and performance: Who minds the shop while employees watch the boss? The Academy of Management Journal, 48, 874–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23, 472–490.Google Scholar
  42. Mikulincer, M. (1995). Attachment style and the mental representation of the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1203–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mikulincer, M. (1998). Adult attachment style and individual differences in functional versus dysfunctional experiences of anger. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 513–524.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Mikulincer, M., & Florian, V. (1998). The relationship between adult attachment styles and emotional and cognitive reactions to stressful events. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 143–165). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  45. Mikulincer, M., Florian, V., & Tolmacz, R. (1990). Attachment styles and fear of personal death: A case study of affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mikulincer, M., & Orbach, I. (1995). Attachment styles and repressive defensiveness: The accessibility and architecture of affective memories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 917–925.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Mikulincer, M., Orbach, I., & Iavnieli, D. (1998). Adult attachment style and affect regulation: Strategic variations in subjective self-other similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 436–448.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2005). Mental representations of attachment security: Theoretical foundation for a positive social psychology. In M. W. Baldwin (Ed.), Interpersonal cognition (pp. 233–266). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  49. Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., & Pereg, D. (2003). Attachment theory and affect regulation: The dynamics, development, and cognitive consequences of attachment-related strategies. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 77–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., & Slav, K. (2006). Attachment, mental representations of others, and gratitude and forgiveness in romantic relationships. In M. Mikulincer & G. S. Goodman (Eds.), Dynamics of romantic love: Attachment, caregiving, and sex (pp. 190–215). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  51. Mikulincer, M., & Sheffi, E. (2000). Adult attachment style and cognitive reactions to positive affect: A test of mental categorization and creative problem solving. Motivation and Emotion, 24, 149–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  53. Pereg, D., & Mikulincer, M. (2001). Mood and cognition: The moderating role of attachment style. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Bar-Ilan University.Google Scholar
  54. Pillai, R., Schriesheim, C. A., & Williams, E. S. (1999). Fairness perceptions and trust as mediators for transformational and transactional leadership: A two-sample study. Journal of Management, 25, 897–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Quick, J. C., Joplin, J. R., Nelson, D. L., Mangelsdorff, A. D., & Fiedler, E. (1996). Self-reliance and military service training outcomes. Military Psychology, 8, 279–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Quick, J. C., Nelson, D. L., & Quick, J. D. (1990). Stress and challenge at the top: The paradox of the successful executive. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  57. Ravitz, P., Maunder, R., Hunter, J., Sthankiya, B., & Lancee, W. (2010). Adult attachment measures: A 25-year review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 69, 419–432.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Richards, D. A., & Hackett, R. D. (2012). Attachment and emotion regulation: Compensatory interactions and leader–member exchange. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 686–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Richards, D. A., & Schat, A. C. H. (2011). Attachment at (not to) work: Applying attachment theory to explain individual behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 169–182.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35, 651–665.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32, 344–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shaver, P., Collins, N., & Clark, C. (1996). Attachment styles and internal working models of self and relationship partners. Knowledge structures in close relationships: A social psychological approach (pp. 25–61). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  63. Shaver, P. R., & Mikulincer, M. (2002). Dialogue on adult attachment: Diversity and integration. Attachment and Human Development, 4, 243–257.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Simmons, B., Gooty, J., Nelson, D., & Little, L. (2009). Secure attachment: Implications for hope, trust, burnout, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tan, H., & Lim, A. (2009). Trust in co-workers and trust in organizations. The Journal of Psychology, 143, 45–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Tepper, B. J. (1995). Upward maintenance tactics in supervisory mentoring and non-mentoring relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1191–1205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tidwell, M., Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. R. (1996). Attachment styles, attractiveness, and emotions in social interactions: A diary study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 729–745.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Wieselquist, J., Rusbult, C., Foster, C., & Agnew, C. (1999). Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 942–966.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship behaviors and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yakovleva, M., Reilly, R. R., & Werko, R. (2010). Why do we trust? Moving beyond individual to dyadic perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 79–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Lance Frazier
    • 1
  • Janaki Gooty
    • 2
  • Laura M. Little
    • 3
  • Debra L. Nelson
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Management, College of Business and Public AdministrationOld Dominion UniversityNorfolkUSA
  2. 2.Belk College of BusinessThe University of North Carolina at CharlotteCharlotteUSA
  3. 3.Department of Management, Terry College of BusinessUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  4. 4.Department of Management, Spears School of BusinessOklahoma State UniversityStillwaterUSA

Personalised recommendations