Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 339–345 | Cite as

Expecting the Worst: Moderating Effects of Social Cynicism on the Relationships Between Relationship Conflict and Negative Affective Reactions

Article

Abstract

Purpose

Social cynicism, defined as negative beliefs about people and social institutions, shows negative impact on people’s affective reactions. We extended this line of work by testing the moderating effects of social cynicism on the relationships between relationship conflict and its affective consequences.

Design/Methodology/Approach

The data were collected using a computer-assisted random telephone survey method (N = 572).

Findings

As expected, social cynicism and relationship conflict were related negatively to job satisfaction and life satisfaction, but positively to intention to quit. More importantly, the negative relationships between relationship conflict and job satisfaction and life satisfaction, and the positive relationship between relationship conflict and intention to quit were not significant when social cynicism was high.

Implications

Our findings suggest that social cynicism is like a two-edged sword. Social cynicism is not only correlated with a range of negative attitudes and reactions, but also able to cushion people from the negative effects of relationship conflict on affective reactions.

Originality/Value

This study is among the first to examine the moderating role of social cynicism. Interestingly, social cynicism played a mitigating role on the relationships between relationship conflict and negative affective reactions.

Keywords

Social cynicism Relationship conflict Affective reactions Job satisfaction Life satisfaction Intention to quit 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by a Grant from National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, No. 70802055) and by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Andersson, L. M. (1996). Employee cynicism: An examination using a contract violation framework. Human Relations, 49, 1395–1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: America’s perception of life of quality. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  4. Bond, M. H., Leung, K., Au, A., Tong, K-Kit, & Chemonges-Nielson, Z. (2004). Combining social axioms with values in predicting social behaviours. European Journal of Personality, 18, 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buckley, M. R., Mobbs, T. A., Mendoza, J. L., Novicevic, M. M., Carraher, S. M., & Beu, D. S. (2002). Implementing realistic job previews and expectation-lowering procedures: A field experiment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cox, K. B. (2003). The effects of intrapersonal, intragroup, and intergroup conflict on team performance effectiveness and work satisfaction. Nursing Adminstration Quarterly, 27, 153–163.Google Scholar
  7. De Dreu, C. K. W., Harinck, F., & Van Vianen, A. E. M. (1999). Conflict and performance in groups and organizations. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van de Vliert, E. (1997). Using conflict in organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. De Dreu, C. K. W., Van Dierendonck, D., & De Best-Waldhober, M. (2002). Conflict at work and individual well-being. In M. Schabracq, J. A. M. Winnubst, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), The handbook of work and health psychology (pp. 495–515). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van Vianen, A. E. M. (2001). Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741–749.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dean, J. W., Jr., Brandes, P., & Dharwadkar, R. (1998). Organizational cynicism. Academy of Management Review, 23, 341–352.Google Scholar
  13. Duffy, M. K., Shaw, J. D., & Stark, E. M. (2000). Performance and satisfaction in conflicted interdependent groups: What and how does self-esteem make a difference? Academy of Management Journal, 43, 772–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eurobarometer. (2005). Available from the Eurobarometer surveys website. http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/index_en.htm.
  15. Evans, M. G. (1985). A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 305–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Friedman, R. A., Currall, S. C., & Tsai, J. C. (2000). What goes around comes around: The impact of personal conflict style on work conflict and stress. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 11, 32–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fu, P. P., Kennedy, J., Tata, J., Yukl, G., Bond, M. H., & Peng, T. K. (2004). The impact of societal cultural values and individual social beliefs on the perceived effectiveness of managerial influence strategies: A meso approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 38, 284–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gardner, D. L. (1992). Conflict and retention of new graduate nurses. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 14, 76–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Graham, J. R. (1993). MMPI-2: Assessing personality and psychopathology (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Guerra, J. M., Martínez, I., Munduate, L., & Medina, F. J. (2005). A contingency perspective on the study of the consequences of conflict types: The role of organizational culture. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14, 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guetzkow, H., & Gry, J. (1954). An analysis of conflict in decision-making groups. Human Relations, 7, 367–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jehn, K. A., Chadwick, C., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (1997). To agree or not agree: The effects of value congruence, individual demographic dissimilarity, and conflict on workgroup outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 8, 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kanter, D. L., & Mirvis, P. H. (1989). The cynical Americans: Living and working in an age of discontent and disillusion. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc.Google Scholar
  26. Lai, J. H., Bond, M. H., & Hui, N. H. (2007). The role of social axioms in predicting life satisfaction: A longitudinal study in Hong Kong. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8, 517–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (2004). Social axioms: A model for social beliefs in multi-cultural perspective. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 36, pp. 119–197). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. Leung, K., Ip, O. K. M., & Leung, K. K. (2010). Social cynicism and job satisfaction: A longitudinal analysis. Applied Psychology, 59, 318–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leung, K., Tong, K. K., & Ho, S. S. Y. (2004). Effects of interactional justice on egocentric bias in resource allocation decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 405–415.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leung, K., et al. (2002). Social axioms: The search for universal dimensions of general beliefs about how the world functions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 286–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Medina, F. J., Munduate, L., Dorado, M. A., Martínez, I., & Guerra, J. M. (2005). Types of intragroup conflict and affective reactions. Journal of managerial psychology, 20, 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meeker, B. F. (1983). Cooperative orientation, trust, and reciprocity. Human Relations, 27, 225–243.Google Scholar
  33. Murnighan, J. K., & Conlon, D. E. (1991). The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of British string quartets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Navia, L. E. (1996). Classical cynicism: A critical study. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  35. O’Connell, B. J., Holzman, H. H., & Armandi, B. R. (1986). Police cynicism and the modes of adaptation. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 14, 307–313.Google Scholar
  36. Oliver, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  37. Peterson, D. R. (1983). Conflict. In H. H. Kelley, et al. (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 360–396). New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  38. Pinkley, R. L. (1990). Dimensions of conflict frame: Disputant interpretations of conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pope, K. S., Butcher, J. N., & Seelen, J. (1993). The MMPI, MMPI-2 & MMPI-A in court. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  40. Pruitt, D. G., & Kimmel, M. J. (1977). Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 363–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reichers, A. E., Wanous, J. P., & Austin, J. T. (1997). Understanding and managing cynicism about organizational change. Academy of Management Executive, 11, 48–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ross, R. S. (1989). Conflict. In R. Ross & J. Ross (Eds.), Small groups in organizational settings (pp. 139–178). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  43. Rutte, C. G., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1992). Goals, expectations, and behavior in a social dilemma situation. In W. B. G. Liebrand, D. M. Messick, & H. A. M. Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 289–305). New York: Pergammon.Google Scholar
  44. Sackett, P. R., & Larson, J. R., Jr. (1990). Research strategies and tactics in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 410–489). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  45. Singelis, T. M., Hubbard, C., Her, P., & An, S. (2003). Convergent validation of the social axioms survey. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 269–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Spector, P. E., & Jex, S. M. (1998). Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: Interpersonal conflict at work scale, organizational constraints scale, quantitative workload inventory, and physical symptoms inventory. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3, 356–367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thomas, K. W. (1992). Conflict and negotiation processes in organizations. In M. Dunnette & L. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 651–718). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  48. Thomas, J. L., Bliese, P. D., & Jex, S. M. (2005). Interpersonal conflict and organizational commitment: Examining two levels of supervisory support as multilevel moderators. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 2375–2398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tjosvold, D. (1997). Conflict within interdependence: Its value for productivity and individuality. In C. K. W. De Dreu & E. Van de Vliert (Eds.), Using conflict in organizations (pp. 23–37). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  50. Wall, J., & Callister, R. (1995). Conflict and its management. Journal of Management, 21, 515–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yamagishi, T. (1986). The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 110–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefei China
  2. 2.Department of ManagementCity University of Hong KongKowloonHong Kong
  3. 3.Center for Business Studies, School of ManagementXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina
  4. 4.School of ManagementZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations