Expecting the Worst: Moderating Effects of Social Cynicism on the Relationships Between Relationship Conflict and Negative Affective Reactions
- 556 Downloads
Social cynicism, defined as negative beliefs about people and social institutions, shows negative impact on people’s affective reactions. We extended this line of work by testing the moderating effects of social cynicism on the relationships between relationship conflict and its affective consequences.
The data were collected using a computer-assisted random telephone survey method (N = 572).
As expected, social cynicism and relationship conflict were related negatively to job satisfaction and life satisfaction, but positively to intention to quit. More importantly, the negative relationships between relationship conflict and job satisfaction and life satisfaction, and the positive relationship between relationship conflict and intention to quit were not significant when social cynicism was high.
Our findings suggest that social cynicism is like a two-edged sword. Social cynicism is not only correlated with a range of negative attitudes and reactions, but also able to cushion people from the negative effects of relationship conflict on affective reactions.
This study is among the first to examine the moderating role of social cynicism. Interestingly, social cynicism played a mitigating role on the relationships between relationship conflict and negative affective reactions.
KeywordsSocial cynicism Relationship conflict Affective reactions Job satisfaction Life satisfaction Intention to quit
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: America’s perception of life of quality. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
- Cox, K. B. (2003). The effects of intrapersonal, intragroup, and intergroup conflict on team performance effectiveness and work satisfaction. Nursing Adminstration Quarterly, 27, 153–163.Google Scholar
- De Dreu, C. K. W., Harinck, F., & Van Vianen, A. E. M. (1999). Conflict and performance in groups and organizations. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van de Vliert, E. (1997). Using conflict in organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- De Dreu, C. K. W., Van Dierendonck, D., & De Best-Waldhober, M. (2002). Conflict at work and individual well-being. In M. Schabracq, J. A. M. Winnubst, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), The handbook of work and health psychology (pp. 495–515). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Dean, J. W., Jr., Brandes, P., & Dharwadkar, R. (1998). Organizational cynicism. Academy of Management Review, 23, 341–352.Google Scholar
- Eurobarometer. (2005). Available from the Eurobarometer surveys website. http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/index_en.htm.
- Fu, P. P., Kennedy, J., Tata, J., Yukl, G., Bond, M. H., & Peng, T. K. (2004). The impact of societal cultural values and individual social beliefs on the perceived effectiveness of managerial influence strategies: A meso approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 38, 284–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Graham, J. R. (1993). MMPI-2: Assessing personality and psychopathology (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kanter, D. L., & Mirvis, P. H. (1989). The cynical Americans: Living and working in an age of discontent and disillusion. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc.Google Scholar
- Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (2004). Social axioms: A model for social beliefs in multi-cultural perspective. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 36, pp. 119–197). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Meeker, B. F. (1983). Cooperative orientation, trust, and reciprocity. Human Relations, 27, 225–243.Google Scholar
- Navia, L. E. (1996). Classical cynicism: A critical study. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
- O’Connell, B. J., Holzman, H. H., & Armandi, B. R. (1986). Police cynicism and the modes of adaptation. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 14, 307–313.Google Scholar
- Oliver, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Peterson, D. R. (1983). Conflict. In H. H. Kelley, et al. (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 360–396). New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
- Pope, K. S., Butcher, J. N., & Seelen, J. (1993). The MMPI, MMPI-2 & MMPI-A in court. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Ross, R. S. (1989). Conflict. In R. Ross & J. Ross (Eds.), Small groups in organizational settings (pp. 139–178). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Rutte, C. G., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1992). Goals, expectations, and behavior in a social dilemma situation. In W. B. G. Liebrand, D. M. Messick, & H. A. M. Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 289–305). New York: Pergammon.Google Scholar
- Sackett, P. R., & Larson, J. R., Jr. (1990). Research strategies and tactics in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 410–489). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- Spector, P. E., & Jex, S. M. (1998). Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: Interpersonal conflict at work scale, organizational constraints scale, quantitative workload inventory, and physical symptoms inventory. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3, 356–367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thomas, K. W. (1992). Conflict and negotiation processes in organizations. In M. Dunnette & L. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 651–718). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- Tjosvold, D. (1997). Conflict within interdependence: Its value for productivity and individuality. In C. K. W. De Dreu & E. Van de Vliert (Eds.), Using conflict in organizations (pp. 23–37). London: Sage.Google Scholar