Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 385–396 | Cite as

Individual Values, Organizational Commitment, and Participation in a Change: Israeli Teachers’ Approach to an Optional Educational Reform

Article

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine how individual values and organizational commitment are related to teachers’ participation in an optional change program in the Israeli educational system.

Design/Methodology/Approach

Data were obtained from 214 Israeli teachers employed in 25 secular Jewish schools during a time when teachers had the option of joining a reform plan initiated by the government and one of several Israeli teachers’ unions.

Findings

The results, using analysis of variance and logistic regression, showed that teachers who joined the reform valued conservation more than those who did not. These teachers also scored higher on normative organizational commitment in comparison to teachers who did not join the reform. The logistic regression showed that organizational commitment had a stronger effect on participation in the reform than individual values.

Implications

Little data exists on top-down change processes in organizations. Research on issues such as the one discussed here can help academics better understand such change processes, and can help practitioners and decision makers in planning and implementing large-scale change.

Originality/Value

Few studies currently offer data on the relationship between values and commitment, on the one hand, and participation in a top-down change program on the other. Additionally, most studies of attitudes and values have examined them in a stable environment. This study examines how the two concepts are related to participation in change in a turbulent environment and can deepen our understanding of values and commitment.

Keywords

Participation in a change Organizational commitment Individual values 

References

  1. Aldrich, J. H., & Nelson, F. D. (1984). Linear probability, logit, and probit models. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18.Google Scholar
  3. Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., & Begley, T. M. (2003). The employment relationships of foreign workers versus local employees: A field study of organizational justice, job satisfaction, performance, and OCB. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 561–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armenakis, A. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (1999). Organizational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25, 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beer, M., & Nohria, N. (2000). Cracking the code of change. Harvard Business Review, 78(May), 133–141.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Berings, D., De Fruyt, F., & Bouwen, R. (2004). Work values and personality traits as predictors of enterprising and social vocational interests. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 349–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clugston, M., Howell, J. P., & Dorfman, P. W. (2000). Does cultural socialization predict multiple bases and foci of commitment? Journal of Management, 26, 5–30.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, A. (2003). Multiple commitments in the workplace: An integrative approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, A. (2007). An examination of the relationship between commitments and culture among five cultural groups of Israeli teachers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Demaris, A. (1992). Logit modeling: Practical applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Education in Israel. (2009). In Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved September 2, 2009, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_in_Israel.
  13. Elias, S. M. (2009). Employee commitment in times of change: Assessing the importance of attitudes toward organizational change. Journal of Management, 35, 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Farh, J. L., Hackett, R. D., & Liang, J. (2007). Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support-employee outcomes relationships in China: Comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 715–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fedor, D. B., Caldwell, S., & Herold, D. M. (2006). The effects of organizational changes on employee commitment: A multilevel investigation. Personnel Psychology, 59, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferlie, E., Ashburner, L., Fitzgerald, L., & Pettigrew, A. M. (1996). The new public management in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fischer, R., & Smith, P. B. (2006). Who cares about justice? The moderating effect of values on the link between organizational justice and work behavior. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55, 541–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fontaine, J. R. J., Poortinga, Y. H., Delbeke, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2008). Structural equivalence of the values domain across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 345–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Francesco, A. N., & Chen, Z. X. (2004). Collectivism in action: Its moderating effects on the relationship between organizational commitment and employee performance in China. Group & Organization Management, 29, 425–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gregersen, H. B. (1993). Multiple commitments at work and extra-role behavior during three stages of organizational tenure. Journal of Business Research, 26, 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harman, H. (1967). Modern factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work related values. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Israel Ministry of Education. (2009). New horizon. Retrieved September 2, 2009, from http://cms.education.gov.il/EducationCMS/Units/Ofek/.
  24. Israeli Teachers Union (Histadrut Hamorim Be’Israel). (2008). Retrieved December 21, 2009, from http://www.itu.org.il/Index.asp?ArticleID=11210&CategoryID=1406&Page=1.
  25. Kabanoff, B., Waldersee, R., & Cohen, M. (1995). Espoused values and organizational change themes. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1075–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kashti, O. (2008). Teachers refuse to “Ofek Hadash” reform, Ministry of Education ignores. Haaretz online. Retrieved August 31, 2009, from http://www.haaretz.com/hasite/spages/999076.html.
  27. Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. L. (2001). The impact of cultural values on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in self-managing work teams: The mediating role of employee resistance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 557–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kondratuk, T. B., Hausdorf, P. A., Korabik, K., & Rosin, H. M. (2004). Linking career mobility with corporate loyalty: How does job change relate to organizational commitment? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 332–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lam, S. K. S., Schaubroeck, J., & Aryee, S. (2002). Relationship between organizational justice and employee work outcomes: A cross-national study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lau, C., & Woodman, R. W. (1995). Understanding organizational change: A schematic perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 537–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Madsen, S. R., Miler, D., & Cameron, R. J. (2005). Readiness for organizational change: Do organizational commitment and social relationships in the workplace make a difference? Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16, 213–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meyer, P. J., & Allen, J. N. (1984). Testing the Side Bet Theory of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 372–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meyer, P. J., & Allen, J. N. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Meyer, P. J., Allen, J. N., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meyer, P. J., & Smith, C. A. (2000). HRM Practices and organizational commitment: Test of a mediation model. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 17, 319–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meyer, P. J., Srinivas, E. S., Lal, J. B., & Topolnytsky, L. (2007). Employee commitment and support for an organizational change: Test of the three-component model in two cultures. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 185–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meyer, P. J., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morita, J. G., Lee, W. T., & Mowday, R. T. (1993). The regression-analog to survival analysis: A selected application to turnover research. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1430–1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mueller, C. W., & Lawler, E. J. (1999). Commitment to nested organizational units: Some basic principles and preliminary findings. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 325–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pearson, C. A. L., & Chong, J. (1997). Contributions of job content and social information on organizational commitment and job satisfaction: An exploration in a Malaysian nursing context. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70, 357–374.Google Scholar
  41. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sagie, A., & Koslowsky, M. (2000). Participation and empowerment in organizations: Modeling, effectiveness and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Sagie, A., & Weisberg, J. (2001). The transformation in human resource management in Israel. International Journal of Manpower, 22, 226–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  46. Schwartz, S. H. (1996). Value priorities and behavior: Applying a theory of integrated value systems. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olsen, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 1–25). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
  47. Schwartz, S. H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48, 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schwartz, S. H. (2005). Robustness and fruitfulness of a theory on universals in individual human values. In A. Tamayo & J. B. Porto (Eds.), Idem (pp. 56–95).Google Scholar
  49. Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (2001). Value hierarchies across cultures: Taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 268–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., & Harris, M. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schwartz, S. H., & Sagiv, L. (1995). Identifying culture-specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 92–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schwartz, S. H., Sagiv, L., & Boehnke, K. (2000). Worries and values. Journal of Personality, 68, 309–346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sminia, H., & Nistelrooij, A. V. (2006). Strategic management and organization development: Planned change in a public sector organization. Journal of Change Management, 6(1), 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Waldersee, R., & Griffiths, A. (2009). Implementing change: Matching implementation methods and change type. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(5), 424–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wasti, S. A. (2003). The influence of cultural values on antecedents of organizational commitment: An individual-level analysis. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 52, 533–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yousef, D. A. (2000). Organizational commitment and job satisfaction as predictors of attitudes toward organizational change in a non-western setting. Personnel Review, 29, 567–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zelikovitz, Y. M. (2009). Union of elementary schools teachers: “Ofek Hadash” reform failed (Hebrew). Ynet. Retrieved August 31, 2009, from http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/1,7340,L-3690306,00.html.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Political Science, Division of Public AdministrationUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations