Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 79–89 | Cite as

Perceptions As Reality: The Influence of Actual and Perceived Demographic Dissimilarity



Two studies were conducted to examine the effects of demographic dissimilarity from others in the workgroup. Results from Study 1 (n = 87 coaches) indicate that actual demographic differences were reliably related to perceptions of such differences. Study 2 investigated the effects of perceived demographic dissimilarity. Data were gathered from an additional 175 coaches. Structural equation modeling indicated that perceived demographic differences were associated with perceived deep-level dissimilarity (i.e., differences in personality, values, and attitudes). In turn, perceived deep-level dissimilarity was negatively related to coworker satisfaction and held a positive association with organizational turnover intentions. Results are discussed in terms of theoretical contributions to the relational demography perspective.


Diversity Perceptions Categorization 


  1. Barsade, S. G., Ward, A. J., Turner, J. D. F., & Sonnonfeld, J. A. (2000). To your heart’s content: A model of affective diversity in top management teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 802–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bishop, J. W., & Scott, K. D. (2000). An examination of organizational and team commitment in a self-directed team environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 439–450.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruning, J. L., & Kintz, B. L. (1997). Computational handbook of statistics (4th ed.). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  4. Button, S. B. (2001). Organizational efforts to affirm sexual diversity: A cross-level examination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 17–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chattapadhyay, P. (1999). Beyond direct and symmetrical effects: The influence of demographic dissimilarity on organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 273–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crampton, S. M., & Wagner, J. A., III (1994). Percept-percept inflation in microorganizational research: An investigation of prevalence and effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cunningham, G. B., & Sagas, M. (2004a). Examining the main and interactive effects of deep- and surface-level diversity on job satisfaction and organizational turnover intentions. Organizational Analysis, 12, 319–332.Google Scholar
  10. Cunningham, G. B., & Sagas, M. (2004b). Racial differences in occupational turnover intent among NCAA Division IA assistant football coaches. Sociology of Sport Journal, 21, 84–92.Google Scholar
  11. DeHass, D. (2003). 2001 – 02 race demographics of NCAA member institutions’ athletic personnel. Indianapolis, IN: The National Collegiate Athletic Association.Google Scholar
  12. Edwards, J. R. (1994). The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 51–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Flynn, F. J., Chatman, J. A., & Spataro, S. E. (2001). Getting to know you: The influence of personality on impressions and performance of demographically different people in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 414–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance, evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 64–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2001). The influence of self-efficacy and past behaviour on the physical activity intentions of young people. Journal of Sports Sciences, 19, 711–725.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 96–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1029–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575–604.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hobman, E. V., Bordia, P., & Gallois, C. (2003). Consequences of feeling dissimilar from others in a work team. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Korsgaard, M. A., & Roberson, L. (1995). Procedural justice in performance evaluation—The role of instrumental and noninstrumental voice in performance-appraisal discussions. Journal of Management, 21, 657–669.Google Scholar
  22. Lawrence, B. S. (1997). The black box of organizational demography. Organization Science, 8, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lease, S. H. (1998). Annual review, 1993 – 1997: Work attitudes and outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 53, 154–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mano-Negrin, R. (2003). Gender-related opportunities and turnover: The case of medical sector employees. Gender, Work, & Occupation, 10, 342–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maume, D. J., Jr. (1999). Glass ceiling and glass escalators: Occupational segregation and race and sex differences in managerial promotions. Work and Occupations, 26, 483–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maurer, T. J., & Rafuse, N. E. (2001). Learning, not litigating: Managing employee development and avoiding claims of age discrimination. Academy of Management Executive, 15(4), 110–121.Google Scholar
  27. Mount, M. K., Sytsma, M. R., Hazucha, J. F., & Holt, K. E. (1997). Rater-ratee effects in developmental performance ratings of managers. Personnel Psychology, 50, 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mueller, C. W., Finley, A., Iverson, R. D., & Price, J. L. (1999). The effects of group racial composition on job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and career commitment. Work and Occupations, 26, 187–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ngo, H., Floey, S., Wong, A., & Loi, R. (2003). Who gets more of the pie? Predictors of perceived gender inequity at work. Journal of Business Ethics, 45, 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nier, J. A., Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Banker, B. S., & Ward, C. M. (2001). Changing interracial evaluations and behavior: The effects of a common ingroup identity. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4, 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. O’Reilly, C. A., III, Caldwell, D., & Barnett, W. (1989). Executive team demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research. Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Riordan, C. M. (2000). Relational demography within groups: Past developments, contradictions, new directions. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 19, pp. 131–173). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  35. Riordan, C. M., & Shore, L. M. (1997). Demographic diversity and employee attitudes: An empirical examination of relational demography within work units. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 342–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sagas, M., & Cunningham, G. B. (2004). Gender differences in the career success of intercollegiate athletic administrators: The role of discrimination, human capital, and social capital. Sex Roles, 50, 411–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stroh, L. K., Brett, J. M., & Reilly, A. H. (1996). Family structure, glass ceiling, and traditional explanations for the differential rate of turnover of female and male managers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  39. Thomas, D. C., Ravlin, E. C., & Wallace, A. W. (1996). Effect of cultural diversity in work groups. In P. A. Bamberger, M. Erez, & S. B. Bacharach (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 14, pp. 1–33). London: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  40. Tsui, A. S., & Gutek, B. A. (1999). Demographic differences in organizations: Current research and future directions. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  41. Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & O’Reilly, C. A., III (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Turner, J., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: B. Blackwell.Google Scholar
  43. van Knippenberg, D., & Haslam, S. A. (2003). Realizing the diversity dividend: Exploring the subtle interplay between identity, ideology, and reality. In S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 61–80). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  44. van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008–1022.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wesolowski, M. A., & Mossholder, K. W. (1997). Relational demography in supervisor-subordinate dyads: Impact on subordinate job satisfaction, burnout, and perceived procedural justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly, C. A., III (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 77–140). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  47. Wilson, G., Sakura-Lemessy, I., & West, J. P. (1999). Reaching the top: Racial differences in the mobility paths to upper-tier occupations. Work and Occupations, 26, 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business, LCC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory for Diversity in Sport, Department of Health and KinesiologyTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations