Skip to main content
Log in

The Effect of Induced Positive and Negative Emotion and Openness-to-Feeling in Student’s Consumer Decision Making

  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How do emotional states affect risk-taking and consumer decisions? Serial experiments were conducted to demonstrate and explain the relationships among emotions, risk-taking, and consumer decisions. Study 1 showed that participants whose emotional condition was negative were more likely to systematically engage in risk-taking behavior than those exhibiting positive emotions, and the emotional effects were moderated by openness to feeling (OF) as a function of individual personality. Studies 2–5 were mainly to examine the effects of emotional conditions on consumer decision. The results of studies 2–5 substantiated our prediction that participants in positive emotional states were less likely to respond to puffer advertising and sales promotion, thus increasing the share of an option that is “average” in all dimensions, and more likely to have a compromise effect than in those in a negative emotional condition. Studies 2–5 also found that the emotional effects were moderated by individuals’ openness to their own feelings. The effects are discussed in relation to the literature on emotions, risk-taking, and consumer decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alba, W. J., Marmorstein, H., & Chattopadhyay, A. (1992). Transitions in preference over time: The effects of memory on message persuasiveness. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 406–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arkes, H. R., Herren, L. T., & Isen, A. M., (1988). The role of potential loss in the influence of affect on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 181–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, L., Jaffee, S., Jo, E., & Troccoli, B. T. (2000). On the correction of feeling induced judgmental biases. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 131–152). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (1998). Constructive consumer choice process. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 187–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blattberg, R. C., & Neslin, S. A. (1990). Sales promotion: Concept, methods, and strategies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blattberg, R. C., & Wisniewski, K. J. (1989). Price-induced patterns of competition. Marketing Science, 8, 291–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bless, H., & Forgas, J. P. (2000). Mood and the use of general knowledge structures. In L. L. Martin & G. L. Clore (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user’s guidebook (pp. 9–26). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129–148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ciarrochi, J. V., & Forgas, J. P. (1999). On being tense yet tolerant: The paradoxical effects of trait anxiety and aversive mood on intergroup judgments. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3, 227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clore, G. L., Schwarz, N., & Conway, M. (1994). Affective causes and consequences of social information processing. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., Vol. 1. pp. 323–419). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCras, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa. FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhar, R., Nowlis, S. M., & Sherman, S. J. (2000). Trying hard or hardly trying: An analysis of context effects in choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9, 189–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhar, R., & Simonson, I. (2003). The effect of forced choice on choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 40, 146–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erber, R., & Erber, M. (1994). Beyond mood and social judgment: Mood incongruent recall and mood regulation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 79–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1964). Conflict, decision and dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forgas, J. P. (1990). Affective influences on individual and group judgments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 441–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forgas, J. P. (1991). Mood effects on partner choice: Role of affect in social decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 708–720.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forgas, J. P. (1998). Happy and mistaken? Mood effects on the fundamental attribution error. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 318–331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forgas, J. P., & Ciarrochi, J. (2001). On being happy and possessive: The interactive effects of mood and personality on consumer judgments. Psychology & Marketing, 18, 239–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, T. B., & Catterjee, S. (1995). Asymmetric decoy effects on lower-quality versus higher-quality brands: Meta-analytic and experimental evidence. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 268–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockey, G. R. J., Maule, A. J., Clough, P. J., & Bdzola, L. (2000). Effects of negative mood states on risk in everyday decision making. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 823–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, J., & Puto, C. (1983). Market boundaries and product choice: Illustrating attraction and substitution effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., & Patrick, R. (1983). The effects of positive affect on risk-taking: When the chips are down. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 31, 194–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuvaas, B., & Kaufmann, G. (2004). Impact of mood, framing, and need for cognition and decision makers’ recall and confidence. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17, 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mano, H. (1992). Judgment under distress: Assessing the role of unpleasantness and arousal in judgment formation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 216–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mano, H. (1994). Risk-taking, framing effect, and affect. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 38–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. L. (2000). Moods don’t convey information: Moods in context do. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittal, V., & Ross Jr., W. T. (1998). The impact of positive and negative affect and issue framing on issue interpretation and risk taking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 298–324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J. H., & Reynolds, W. H. (1967). Consumer behavior and marketing management. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusting, C. L. (1998). Personality, mood and cognitive processing of emotional information: Three conceptual frameworks. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 165–196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rusting, C. L., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1998). Regulating responses to anger effects of rumination and distraction on an angry mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 790–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E. T. Higgins & R. Sorrention (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 521–561). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (2001). Feelings as information: Implications for affective influences on information processing. In L. L. Martin & G. L. Clore (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user’s guidebook (pp. 159–176). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 512–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1988). How do I feel about it? The informative function affective states. In K. Fiedler & J. Forgas (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and social behavior (pp. 44–62). New York: Hogrefe.

  • Shafir, E. (1993). Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others. Memory & Cognition, 21, 546–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonson, I. (1989). Choosing based on reason: The case of attraction and compromise effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 158–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonson, I., & Nowlis S. M. (2000). The role of explanations and need for uniqueness in consumer decision making: Unconventional choices based on reasons. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 49–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonson, I., & Tversky A. (1992). Choice in context: Tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 281–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813–838.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stuteville, J. R. (1968). The buyer as a salesman. Journal of Marketing, 32, 14–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors like to thank George A. Neuman as well as the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shih-Chieh Chuang.

Appendix

Appendix

Hospital Parking

You have to visit a close relative in the hospital, and you manage to get away from work for an hour at a busy time. As usual, the small visitors’ car park opposite the hospital is full, and you know from experience that you will probably have to wait 15 min or so at this time for a space. You could drive into the staff car park, but this is occasionally patrolled by hospital security staff, and you know that cars have been clamped.

You wonder where you should park:

(A) Use staff car park (B) Use visitors’ car park

Pub Visit

You have been in a new job for a week and enjoy it. On the Friday, you overhear people talking about visiting a pub together at the end of work. You would like to get to know your colleagues better, but you have not received an invitation to go along with them. You are unsure whether this is just an oversight or a deliberate snub. On your way home you pass the pub where everyone is meeting and consider whether you should go straight home or call in. They may be very pleased to see you, but it may be embarrassing and make future work less enjoyable.

You wonder what you should do:

(A) Go straight home (B) Call in to the pub

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chuang, SC., Lin, HM. The Effect of Induced Positive and Negative Emotion and Openness-to-Feeling in Student’s Consumer Decision Making. J Bus Psychol 22, 65–78 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-007-9049-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-007-9049-6

Keywords

Navigation