Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 599–620 | Cite as




This paper examines the contribution of perceived procedural and distributive justice to satisfaction with benefits. A study of 237 employees in two manufacturing organizations shows that procedural justice is generally a better predictor of benefits satisfaction than distributive. However, for employees in an open culture, distributive justice is a significant predictor of benefits satisfaction, especially in relation to satisfaction with benefits cost. The results indicate that it is important to consider culture’s role in determining the importance of procedural or distributive justice.


satisfaction justice fairness employee benefits. 


  1. Adams J. S., (1965). Inequity in social exchange In: L. Berkowitz, (Eds). Advances in experimental social psychology New York Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambrose M. L., Schminke M., (2003). Organization structure as a moderator of the relationship between procedural justice, interactional justice, perceived organizational support, and supervisory trust Journal of Applied Psychology, 88:295–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambrose M. L., Schminke M., (2001). Are flexible organizations the death knell for the future of procedural justice? In: R. Cropanzano, (Eds). Justice in the workplace II: From theory to practice Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum (pp. 229–244)Google Scholar
  4. Barkema H. G., Vermeulen F., (1997). What differences in the cultural backgrounds of partners are detrimental for international joint ventures? Journal of International Business Studies 28:845–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cate R. M., Lloyd S. A., Henton J. M., Larson J. H., (1982). Justice and reward level as predictors of relationship satisfaction Social Psychology Quarterly 45:177–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Colquitt J. A., (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure Journal of Applied Psychology 86:386–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Danehower C., Celuch K., Lust J., (1994) Benefits management and communication: A marketing orientation Human Resource Management Review 4:177–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis E., Ward E., (1995). Health benefit satisfaction in the public and private sectors: The role of distributive and procedural justice Public Personnel Management 24:255–271Google Scholar
  9. Deutsch M., (1985). Distributive justice New Haven and London Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Dubinsky A. J., Levy M., (1989). Influences of organizational justice on work outcomes of retail salespeople Journal of Retailing 65:221–249Google Scholar
  11. Edwards J. R., (1993). Problems with the use of profile similarity indices in the study of congruence in organizational research Personnel Psychology, 46(Fall):641–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Edwards J. R., (1994). The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: critique and proposed alternative Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 58(April):51–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Folger R., Cropanzano R., (1998). Organizational justice and human resource management Thousand Oaks Sage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  14. Folger R., Greenberg J., (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management 13:141–183Google Scholar
  15. Folger R., Martin C. L., (1986). Relative deprivation and referent cognitions: distributive and procedural justice effects Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 22:531–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gebert D., Boerner S., (1999). The open and closed corporation as conflicting forms of organization The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 35:341–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geisel J., (2002). Health care costs rising unabated Business Insurance 49:1–18Google Scholar
  18. Gomez-Mejia L. R., Balkin D. B., (1992). Determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective Academy of Management Journal 35:921–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greenberg J., (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow Journal of Management 16:399–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hegtvedt K. A., (1990). The effects of relationship structure on emotional responses to inequity Social Psychology Quarterly 53:214–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hofstede G., (1998). Attitudes, values and organizational culture: Disentangling the concepts Organization Studies 19:477–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hofstede G., Neuijen B., Ohayv D., Sanders G., (1990). Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases Administrative Science Quarterly 35:286–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. James L. R., (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement Journal of Applied Psychology 67:219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnston J., (1984). Econometric methods3rd ed New York McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  25. Kulik C. T., Ambrose M. L., (1992). Personal and situational determinants of referent choice Academy of Management Review 17:212–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kumar N., Scheer L., Steenkamp J. B., (1995). The effects of supplier justice on vulnerable resellers Journal of Marketing Research 32:348–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lambert S., (2000). Added benefits: The link between work-life benefits and organizational citizenship behavior Academy of Management Journal 43:801–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Landy F., Barnes-Farrell J., Cleveland J., (1980). Perceived justice and accuracy of performance evaluation: A follow-up Journal of Applied Psychology 65:355–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lerner M., (1974). The justice motive: Equity and justice among children Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 20:127–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leventhal G. S., Karuza J., Fry W. R., (1980). Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences In: G. Mikula, (Eds) Justice and social interaction New York Springer-Verlag (pp. 167–213)Google Scholar
  31. Lindle M. K., Whitney D. J., (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs Journal of Applied Psychology 86:114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Livingstone L. P., Roberts J. A., Chonko L. B., (1995). Perceptions of internal and external equity as predictors of outside salespeople’s job satisfaction Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management 15:33–46Google Scholar
  33. Lust, J., Danehower, C., (1992). The dimensionality of employee benefit satisfaction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Las Vegas, NVGoogle Scholar
  34. Martin C. L., Bennett N., (1996). The role of justice judgements in explaining the relationship between job satisfaction and organizational commitment Group & Organization Management 21:84–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martin C. L., Nagao D., (1989). Some behavioral consequences of computerized interviewing Journal of Applied Psychology 79:72–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McNeilly K. M., Lawson M. B., (1999). Navigating through rough waters: The importance of trust in managing sales representatives in times of change Industrial Marketing Management 28:37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moorman R., (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do justice perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology 76:845–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Netemeyer R. G., Boles J. S., McKee D. O., McMurrian R., (1997). An investigation into the antecedents of organizational citizenship behaviors in a personal selling context Journal of Marketing 61:85–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Podsakoff P. M., Organ D. W., (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects Journal of Management 12:531–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sager J., Yi J., Futrell C. M., (1998). A model depicting salespeople’s perceptions Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management 18:1–22Google Scholar
  41. Sampson E. E., (1975). On justice as equality Journal of Social Issues 31:45–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Scheer L., Kumar N., Steenkamp J. B., (2003). Divergent reactions of U. S. and Dutch dealers to perceived inequity in channel relationships Academy of Management Journal, 46:303–316Google Scholar
  43. Steenkamp J. B., Baumgartner H., (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research Journal of Consumer Research 25:78–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tax S. S., Brown S. W., Chandrashekaran M., (1998). Customer evaluations of service complaint experiences: Implications for relationship marketing Journal of Marketing 62:60–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tremblay M., Sire B., Balkin D., (2000). The role of organizational justice in pay and employee benefit satisfaction, and its effects on work attitudes Group and Organization Management, 25:269–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tremblay M., Sire B., Pelchet A., (1998). The role of organizational justice in pay and employee benefit satisfaction, and its effects on work attitudes Group & Organization Management 25:269–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tyler T., Lind E., (1992). A relational model of authority in groups Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 25:115–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tyler T., Rasinski K., McGraw K., (1985). The influence of perceived injustice on the endorsement of political leaders Journal of Applied Social Psychology 15:700–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Walster E., Berscheid E., Walster G., (1973). New directions in equity research Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35:151–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Walster E., Walster G., Berscheid E., (1978). Equity: Theory and research Boston Allyn & BaconGoogle Scholar
  51. Williams M., (1995). Antecedents of employee benefit level satisfaction: A test of a model Journal of Management 21:1097–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Williams M., Malos S., Palmer D., (2002). Benefit system and benefit level satisfaction: An expanded model of antecedents and consequences Journal of Management 28:195–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Business AdministrationOklahoma State UniversityStillwaterUSA
  2. 2.School of BusinessRutgers UniversityCamdenUSA
  3. 3.College of Business AdministrationOklahoma State UniversityStillwaterUSA

Personalised recommendations