Journal of Biological Physics

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 161–182 | Cite as

Numerical Simulation of Physiological Blood Flow in 2-way Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts



The Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) yields excellent results and remains the modern standard of care for treatment of occlusive disease in the cardiovascular system. However, the development of anastomotic Intimal Hyperplasia (IH) and restenosis can compromise the medium-and-long term effects of the CABG. This problem can be correlated with the geometric configuration and hemodynamics of the bypass graft. A novel geometric configuration was proposed for the CABG with two symmetrically implanted grafts for the purpose of improving the hemodynamics. Physiological blood flows in two models of bypass grafts were simulated using numerical methods. One model was for the conventional bypass configuration with a single graft (1-way model); the other model was for the proposed bypass configuration with two grafts (2-way model). The temporal and spatial distributions of hemodynamics, such as flow patterns and Wall Shear Stress (WSS) in the vicinity of the distal anastomoses, were analyzed and compared. Calculation results showed that the 2-way model possessed favorable hemodynamics with uniform longitudinal flow patterns and WSS distributions, which could decrease the probability of restenosis and improve the effect of the surgical treatment. Concerning the limitations of the 2-way bypass grafts, it is necessary to perform animal experiments to verify the viability of this novel idea for the CABG.


anastomosis CABG cardiovascular system geometric configuration hemodynamics intimal hyperplasia restenosis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Hartman, C.W., Kong, Y. and Margolis, J.R.: Aortocoronary Bypass Surgery: Correlation of Angiographic, Symptomatic and Functional Improvement at 1 year, Am. J. carodiol. 37 (1976), 352–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hofer, M., Rappitsch, G., Perktold, K., Trubel, W. and Schima, H.: Numerical Study of Wall Mechanics and Fluid Dynamics in End-to-Side Anastomosis and Correlation to Intimal Hyperplasia, J. Biomech. 29 (1996), 1297–1308.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ojha, M.: Wall Shear Stress Temporal Gradient and Anastomotic Intimal Hyperplasia, Circ. Res. 74 (1994), 1227–1231.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Sottiurai, V.S., Yao, J.S.T., Batson, R.C., Sue, S.L. and Jones, R.: Nakamura YA. Distal anastomotic Intimal Hyperplasia: Histopathologic Character and Biogenesis, Ann. Vasc. Surg. 24 (1989), 711–722.Google Scholar
  5. Hyun, S., Kleinstreuer, C. and Archie, J.P. Jr.: Hemodynamics Analysis of Arterial Expansions with Implications to Thrombosis and Restenosis, Med. Eng. Phys. 22 (2000), 13–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Glagov, S.: Intimal Hyperplasia, Vascular Modeling and the Restenosis Problem, Circulation 89 (1994), 2888–2891.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bertolotti, C., Deplano, V., Fuseri, J. and Dupouy, P.: Numerical and Experimental Models of Post-Operative Realistic Flows in Stenosed Coronary Bypasses, J. Biomech. 34 (2001), 1049–1064.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Buchanan, J.R., Kleinstreuer, C., Truskey, G.A. and Lei, M.: Relation Between Non-Uniform Hemodynamics and sites of Altered Permeability and Lesion Growth at the Rabbit Aorto-Celiac Junction, Atherosclerosis 143 (1999), 27–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Buchanan, J.R. and Kleinstreuer, C.: Simulation of Particle-Hemodynamics in a Partially Occluded Artery Segment with Implications to the Initiation of Microemboli and Secondary Stenoses, J. Biomech. Eng. 120 (1998), 446–454.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Inzoli, F., Migliavacca, F. and Pennati, G.: Numerical Analysis of Steady Flow in Aorto-Coronary Bypass 3-D Model, J. Biomech. Eng. 118 (1996), 172–179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Longest, P.W. and Kleinstreuer, C.: Particle-Hemodynamics Modeling of the Distal End-to-Side Femoral Bypass: Effects of Graft Caliber and Graft-End Cut, Med. Eng. Phys. 25 (2003), 843–858.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Longest, P.W. and Kleinstreuer, C.: Comparison of Blood Particle Deposition Models for Non-Parallel Flow Domains, J. Biomech. 36 (2003), 421–430.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Longest, P.W., Kleinstreuer, C. and Archie, J.P. Jr.: Particle Hemodynamics Analysis of Miller Cuff Arterial Anastomosis, J. Vasc. Surg. 38 (2003), 1353–1362.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Longest, P.W. and Kleinstreuer, C.: Numerical Simulation of Wall Shear Stress Conditions and Platelet Localization in Realistic End-to-Side Arterial Anastomoses, J. Biomech. Eng. 125 (2003), 671–681.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Longest, P.W., Kleinstreuer, C., Truskey, G.A. and Buchanan, J.R.: Relation Between Near-Wall Residence Times of Monocytes and Early Lesion Growth in the Rabbit Aorto-Celiac Junction, Ann. Biomed. Eng. 31 (2003), 53–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Loth, F., Jones, S.A., Zarins, C.K., Giddens, D.P., Nassar, R.F., Glagov, S. and Bassiouny, H.S.: Relative Contribution of Wall Shear Stress and Injury in Experimental Intimal Thickening at PTFE End-to-Side Arterial Anastomoses, J. Biomech. Eng. 124 (2002), 44–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Bassiouny, H.S., White, S., Glagov, S., Choi, E., Giddens, D.P. and Zarins, C.K.: Anastomotic Intimal Hyperplasia: Mechanical Injury or Flow Induced, J. Vasc. Surg. 15 (1992), 708–717.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Wieslander, J.B. and Rausing, A.: A Histologic Comparison of Experimental Microarterial End-in-End (Sleeve) and End-to-End Anastomoses, Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 73 (1984), 279–287.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ku, D.N., Giddens, D.P., Zarins, C.K. and Glagov, S.: Pulsatile Flow and Atherosclerosis in the Human Carotid Bifurcation: Positive Correlation Between Plaque Location and Low and Oscillating Shear Stress, Arteriosclerosis 5 (1985), 293–302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. White, C.R., Haidekker, M., Bao, X. and Frangos, J.A.: Temporal Gradients in Shear, but Not Spatial Gradients, Stimulate Endothelial Cell Proliferation, Circulation 103 (2001), 2508-2513.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Goubergrits, L., Affeld, K., Wellnhofer, E., Zurbrugg, R. and Holmer, T.: Estimation of Wall Shear Stress in Bypass Grafts with Computational Fluid Dynamics Method, Int. J. Artif. Organs. 24 (2001), 145–151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Clowes, A.W., Gown, A.M., Hanson, S.R. and Reidy, M.A.: Mechanisms of Arterial Graft Gailure. 1. Role of Cellular Proliferation in Early Healing of PTFE Prostheses, Am. J. Pathol. 118 (1985), 43–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ojha, M., Ethier, C.R., Johnston, K.W. and Cobbold, R.S.: Steady and Pulsatile Flow Fields in an End-to-Side Arterial Anastomosis Model, J. Vasc. Surg. 12 (1990), 747–753.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lei, M., Kleinstreuer, H.C. and Archie, J.P.: Hemodytnamics Simulations and Computer-Aided Designs of G raft-Artery Junctions, J. Biomech. Eng. 119 (1997), 343–348.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Bertolotti, C. and Deplano, V.: Three-Dimensional Numerical Simulations of Flow Through a Stenosed Coronary Bypass, J. Biomech. 33 (2000), 1011–1022.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Henry, F.S., Collins, M.W. and Hughes, P.E.: Numerical Investigation of Steady Flow in Proximal and Distal End-to-Side Anastomoses, J. Biomech. Eng., 118 (1996), 302–310.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Taylor, R.S., Loh, A., McFarland, R.J., Cox, M. and Chester, J.F.: Improved Technique for Polyterafluoroethylence Bypass Grafting: Long-Term Results Using Anastomotic Vein Patches, Br. J. Surg. 79 (1992), 348–354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Moore, J.A., Steinman, D.A. and Prakash, S.: A numerical Study of Blood Flow Patterns in Anatomically Realistic and Simplified End-to-Side Anastomoses, J. Biomech. Eng. 121 (1999), 265–272.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Perktold, K., Tatzl, H. and Rappitsch, G.: Flow Dynamic Effect of the Anastomotic Angle: A Numerical Study of Pulsatile Flow in Vascular Graft Anastomoses Models, Technol. Health. Care. 1 (1994), 197–207.Google Scholar
  30. Kleinstreuer, C., Lei, M. and Archie, J.P. Jr.: Geometric Design Improvements for Femoral Graft-Artery Junctions Mitigating Restenosis, J. Biomech. 29 (1996), 1605–1614.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Cole, J.S., Watterson, J.K. and O’Reilly, M.J.G.: Numerical Investigation of the Haemodynamics at a Patched Arterial Bypass Anastomosis, Med. Eng. Phys. 24 (2002), 393–401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Miller, J.H., Foreman, R.K., Ferguson, L. and Farris, I.: Interposition Vein Cuff for Anastomosis of Prosthesis to Small Artery, Aust. N. Z. J. Surg. 54 (1984), 283–285.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Bonert, M., Myers, J.G., Fremes, S., Williams, J. and Ethier, C.R.: A Numerical Study of Blood Flow in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Side-to-Side Anastomosis, Ann. Biomed. Eng. 30 (2002), 599–611.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kim, Y.H., Chandran, K.B., Bower, T.J. and Corson, J.D.: Flow Dynamics Across End-to-End Vascular Bypass Graft Anastomoses, Ann. Biomed. Eng. 21 (1993), 311–320.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Sherwin, S.J., Shah, O., Doorly, D.J., Perio, J., Papaharrilaou, Y., Watkins, N., Caro, C.G. and Dumoulin, C.L.: The Influence of Out-of-Plane Geometry on the Flow Within a Distal End-to-Side Anastomosis, J. Biomech. Eng. 122 (2000), 86–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Deplano, V., Bertolotti, C. and Boiron, C.: Numerical Simulations of Unsteady Flows in a Stenosed Coronary Bypass Graft, Med. Biol. Eng. Comp. 39 (2001), 488–499.Google Scholar
  37. Leuprecht, A., Perktold, K., Prosi, M., Berk, T., Trubel, W. and Schima, H.: Numerical Study of Hemodynamics and Wall Mechanics in Distal End-to-Side Anastomosis of Bypass Grafts, J. Biomech. 35 (2002), 225–236.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Hughes, P.E. and How, T.W.: Effects of Geometry and Flow Division on Flow Structures in Models of the Distal End-to-Side Anastomosis, J. Biomech. 29 (1996), 855–872.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Lei, M., Giddens, D.P., Jones, S.A., Loth, F. and Bassiouny, H.: Pulsatile Flow in an End-to-Side Vascular Graft Model: Comparison of Computations with Experimental Data, J. Biomech. Eng. 123 (2001), 80–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Noori, N., Scherer, R., Perktold, K., Czerny, M., Karner, G., Trubel, M., Polterauer, P. and Schima, H.: Blood Flow in Distal End-to-Side Anastomoses with PTFE and a Venous Patch: Results of an in vitro Flow Visualisation Study, Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 18 (1999), 191–200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Liu, Y., Qiao, A. and Gao, S.: Physiological Flow Simulation Of Coronary Bypass Graft. Proceedings of the World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Aug 24–29, 2003, Sydney, Australia, [CD-ROM] ISBN 1877040142, Paper No. 1840.Google Scholar
  42. Liu, Y., Qiao, A. and Zhu, H.: Haemodynamics Simulation for Carotid Bifurcation, Chinese J. Biomed. Eng. 12 (2003), 17–24.Google Scholar
  43. Qiao, A.K., Zeng, Y.J. and Xu, X.H.: Numerical Simulations of Stenosed Femoral Artery with Symmetric 2-Way Bypass Graft, Bio-Med. Mater. Eng. 14 (2004), 167–174.Google Scholar
  44. Perktold, K. and Rappitsch, G.: Computer Simulation of Local Blood Flow and Vessel Mechanics in a Compliant Carotid Artery Biffercation Model, J. Biomech. 28 (1995), 845-856.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. White, S.S., Zarins, C.K., Giddens, D.P., Bassiouny, H., Loth, F., Jones, S.A. and Glagov, S.: Hemodynamic Patterns in Two Models of End-to-Side Vascular Graft Anastomoses: Effects of Pulsatility, Flow Division, Reynolds Number, and Hood Length, J. Biomech. Eng. 115 (1993), 104–111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Anayiotos, A.S., Pedroso, P.D., Eleftheriou, E.C., Venugopalan, R. and Holman, W.L.: Effect of a Flow-Streamlining Implant at the Distal Anastomosis of a Coronary Artery Bypass Graft, Ann. Biomed. Eng. 30 (2002), 917–926.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Kute, S.M. and Vorp, D.A.: The Effect of Proximal Artery Flow on the Hemodynamics at the Distal Anastomosis of a Vascular Bypass Graft: Computational Study, J. Biomech. Eng. 123 (2001), 277–283.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Kleinstreuer, C., Lei, M. and Archie, J.P. Jr.: Flow Input Waveform Effects on the Temporal and Spatial Wall Shear Stress Gradients in a Femoral Graft-Artery Connector, J. Biomech. Eng. 118 (1996), 506–510.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Bryan, A.J. and Angelini, G.D.: The Biology of Saphenous Vein Graft Occlusion: Etiology and Strategies for Prevention, Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 9 (1994), 641–649.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Binns, R.L., Ku, D.N., Stewart, M.T., Ansley, J.P. and Coyle, K.A.: Optimal Graft Diameter: Effect of Wall Shear Stress on Vascular Healing, J. Vasc. Surg. 10 (1989), 326–337.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Abbott, W.M., Green, R.M., Matsumato, T., Wheeler, J.R., Miller, N., Veith, F.J., Money, S. and Garrett, H.E.: Prosthetic Above-Knee Femoropopliteal Bypass Grafting: Results of a multi-Center Randomized Prospective Trial, J. Vasc. Surg. 25 (1997), 19–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Qiao, A., Liu, Y. and Guo, Z.: Wall Shear Stresses in Small and Large 2-Way Bypass Grafts, Med. Eng. Phys., in press.Google Scholar
  53. Sanders, R.J., Kempczinski, R.F., Hammond, W. and DiClementi, D.: The Significance of Graft Diameter, Surgery 88 (1980), 856–866.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Ballyk, P., Steinman, D.A. and Ethier, C.R.: Simulation of Non-Newtonian Blood Flow in an End-to-Side Anastomosis, Biorheology 31 (1994), 565–586.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Beijing University of TechnologyBeijingP. R. China
  2. 2.The 202 HospitalLiaoningP. R. China
  3. 3.Medical CollegeShantou UniversityGuangdongP. R. China

Personalised recommendations