Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding stress reports in daily life: a coordinated analysis of factors associated with the frequency of reporting stress

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although stress is a common experience in everyday life, a clear understanding of how often an individual experiences and reports stress is lacking. Notably, there is little information regarding factors that may influence how frequently stress is reported, including which stress dimension is measured (i.e., stressors—did an event happen, subjective stress—how stressed do you feel, conditional stress—how stressful a stressor was) and the temporal features of that assessment (i.e., time of day, day of study, weekday vs. weekend day). The purpose of the present study was to conduct a coordinated analysis of five independent ecological momentary assessment studies utilizing varied stress reporting dimensions and temporal features. Results indicated that, within days, stress was reported at different frequencies depending on the stress dimension. Stressors were reported on 15–32% of momentary reports made within a day; across days, the frequency ranged from 42 to 76% of days. Depending on the cutoff, subjective stress was reported more frequently ranging about 8–56% of all moments within days, and 40–90% of days. Likewise, conditional stress ranged from just 3% of moments to 22%, and 11–69% of days. For the temporal features, stress was reported more frequently on weekdays (compared to weekend days) and on days earlier in the study (relative to days later in the study); time of day was inconsistently related to stress reports. In sum, stress report frequency depends in part on how stress is assessed. As such, researchers may wish to measure stress in multiple ways and, in the case of subjective and conditional stress with multiple operational definitions, to thoroughly characterize the frequency of stress reporting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almeida, D. M., Wethington, E., & Kessler, R. C. (2002). The daily inventory of stressful events: An interview-based approach for measuring daily stressors. Assessment, 9, 41–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barta, W. D., Tennen, H., & Litt, M. D. (2012). Measurement reactivity in diary research. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 108–123). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosschot, J. F., Gerin, W., & Thayer, J. F. (2006). The perseverative cognition hypothesis: A review of worry, prolong stress-related physiological activation, and health. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 60, 113–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Budczies, J., Klauschen, F., Sinn, B. V., Győrffy, B., Schmitt, W. D., Darb-Esfahani, S., et al. (2012). Cutoff Finder: A comprehensive and straightforward Web application enabling rapid biomarker cutoff optimization. PLoS ONE, 7, e51862.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2014). American time use survey technical note. Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/atus.tn.htm. Accessed 26 Dec 2018.

  • Cohen, S., Janicki-Deverts, D., & Miller, G. E. (2007). Psychological stress and disease. Journal of the American Medical Association, 298, 1685–1687.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., Murphy, M. L., & Prather, A. A. (2018). Ten surprising facts about stressful life events and disease risk. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 7.1–7.21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (2014). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. In M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.), Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 35–54). Amsterdam: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damaske, S., Smyth, J. M., & Zawadzki, M. J. (2014). Has work replaced home as a haven? Re-examining Arlie Hochschild’s time bind proposition with objective stress data. Social Science and Medicine, 115, 130–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeCoster, J., Iselin, A. M. R., & Gallucci, M. (2009). A conceptual and empirical examination of justifications for dichotomization. Psychological Methods, 14, 349–366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dockray, S., Grant, N., Stone, A. A., Kahneman, D., Wardle, J., & Steptoe, A. (2010). A comparison of affect ratings obtained with ecological momentary assessment and the day reconstruction method. Social Indicators Research, 99, 269–283.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Epel, E. S., Crosswell, A. D., Mayer, S. E., Prather, A. A., Slavich, G. M., Puterman, E., et al. (2018). More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 49, 146–169.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, V., & Brown, D. K. (2016). Green exercise in the workplace. In J. Barton, R. Bragg, C. Wood, & J. Pretty (Eds.), Green exercise: Linking nature, health and well-being (pp. 139–149). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grzywacz, J. G. (2000). Work-family spillover and health during midlife: Is managing conflict everything? American Journal of Health Promotion, 14, 236–243.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, S. M., & Piccinin, A. M. (2009). Integrative data analysis through coordination of measurement and analysis protocol across independent longitudinal studies. Psychological Methods, 14, 150–164.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Isaacowitz, D. M., Allard, E. S., Murphy, N. A., & Schlangel, M. (2009). The time course of age-related preferences toward positive and negative stimuli. Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 64, 188–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., Kikuchi, H., & Yamamoto, Y. (2013). Systematic comparison between ecological momentary assessment and day reconstruction method for fatigue and mood states in healthy adults. British Journal of Health Psychology, 18, 155–167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klatt, M., Norre, C., Reader, B., Yodice, L., & White, S. (2017). Mindfulness in motion: A mindfulness-based intervention to reduce stress and enhance quality of sleep in Scandinavian employees. Mindfulness, 8, 481–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leger, K. A., Charles, S. T., Turiano, N. A., & Almeida, D. M. (2016). Personality and stressor-related affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 917–928.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Li, R., Dziak, J. J., Tan, X., Huang, L., Wagner, A. T., & Yang, J. (2015). TVEM (time-varying effect model) SAS macro users’ guide (Version 3.1.0). University Park: The Methodology Center, Penn State. Retrieved from http://methodology.psu.edu. Accessed 26 Dec 2018.

  • Lutz, R. S., Stults-Kolehmainen, M. A., & Bartholomew, J. B. (2010). Exercise caution when stressed: Stages of change and the stress–exercise participation relationship. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11, 560–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7, 19–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McEwen, B. S. (1998). Stress, adaptation, and disease: Allostasis and allostatic load. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 840, 33–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mogle, J., Muñoz, E., Hill, N. L., Smyth, J. M., & Sliwinski, M. J. (2019). Daily memory lapses in adults: Characterization and influence on affect. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 74, 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahum-Shani, I., Smith, S. N., Spring, B. J., Collins, L. M., Witkiewitz, K., Tewari, A., et al. (2018). Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) in mobile health: Key components and design principles for ongoing health behavior support. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 52, 446–462.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reyna, V. F., Nelson, W. L., Han, P. K., & Dieckmann, N. F. (2009). How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 943–973.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, P. J., Cofta-Woerpel, L., Mazas, C. A., Vidrine, J. I., Reitzel, L. R., Cinciripini, P. M., et al. (2007). Evaluating reactivity to ecological momentary assessment during smoking cessation. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 15, 382–389.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, J. M., Taylor, D. J., Uchino, B. N., Smith, T. W., Allison, M., Ahn, C., et al. (2017). Evaluating the longitudinal risk of social vigilance on atherosclerosis: Study protocol for the North Texas Heart Study. British Medical Journal Open, 7, e017345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., Bernstein, J. H., & Brown, K. W. (2010). Weekends, work, and well-being: Psychological need satisfactions and day of the week effects on mood, vitality, and physical symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29, 95–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarker, H., Tyburski, M., Rahman, M. M., Hovsepian, K., Sharmin, M., Epstein, D. H., et al. (2016). Finding significant stress episodes in a discontinuous time series of rapidly varying mobile sensor data. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 4489–4501). New York, NY: ACM.

  • Scott, S. B., Graham-Engeland, J. E., Engeland, C. G., Smyth, J. M., Almeida, D. M., Katz, M. J., et al. (2015). The effects of stress on cognitive aging, physiology and emotion (ESCAPE) project. BMC Psychiatry, 15, 146.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Selye, H. (1956/1978). The stress of life. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

  • Shrout, P. E., Stadler, G., Lane, S. P., McClure, M. J., Jackson, G. L., Clavél, F. D., et al. (2018). Initial elevation bias in subjective reports. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, E15–E23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. M., & Heron, K. E. (2012). Health psychology. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 569–584). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. & Heron, K. (2016). Is providing mobile interventions “just-in-time” helpful? An experimental proof of concept study of just-in-time intervention for stress management. In 2016 IEEE Wireless Health (WH) (pp. 1–7). Bethesda, MD: IEEE.

  • Smyth, J. M., Juth, V., Ma, J., & Sliwinski, M. (2017). A slice of life: Ecologically valid methods for research on social relationships and health across the life span. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2017, e12356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. M., Sliwinski, M. J., Zawadzki, M. J., Scott, S. B., Conroy, D. E., Lanza, S. T., et al. (2018). Everyday stress response targets in the science of behavior change. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 101, 20–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. M., & Stone, A. A. (2003). Ecological momentary assessment research in behavioral medicine. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. M., Wonderlich, S. A., Heron, K. E., Sliwinski, M. J., Crosby, R. D., Mitchell, J. E., et al. (2007). Daily and momentary mood and stress are associated with binge eating and vomiting in bulimia nervosa patients in the natural environment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 629–638.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J., Zawadzki, M., & Gerin, W. (2013). Stress and disease: A structural and functional analysis. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 217–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. M., Zawadzki, M. J., Juth, V., & Sciamanna, C. N. (2016). Global life satisfaction predicts ambulatory affect, stress, and cortisol in daily life in working adults. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 40, 320–331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. M., Zawadzki, M. J., Santuzzi, A. M., & Filipkowski, K. B. (2014). Examining the effects of perceived social support on momentary mood and symptom reports in asthma and arthritis patients. Psychology & Health, 29, 813–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, A. A., Schwartz, J. E., Neale, J. M., Shiffman, S., Marco, C. A., Hickcox, M., et al. (1998). A comparison of coping assessed by ecological momentary assessment and retrospective recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1670–1680.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, A. A., & Shiffman, S. (2002). Capturing momentary, self-report data: A proposal for reporting guidelines. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 236–243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stults-Kolehmainen, M. A., & Sinha, R. (2014). The effects of stress on physical activity and exercise. Sports Medicine, 44, 81–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • The Workplace and Health. (2016). The workplace and health. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. http://www.rwjf.org/en/library/research/2016/07/the-workplace-and-health.html. Accessed 26 Dec 2018.

  • TVEM SAS Macro (Version 3.1.0) [Software]. (2015). University Park: The Methodology Center, Penn State. http://methodology.psu.edu. Accessed 26 Dec 2018.

  • Ursin, H., & Eriksen, H. R. (2004). The cognitive activation theory of stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29, 567–592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wheaton, B., & Montazer, S. (2010). Stressors, stress, and distress. In T. L. Scheid & T. N. Brown (Eds.), A handbook for the study of mental health: Social contexts, theories, and systems (2nd ed., pp. 171–199). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zawadzki, M. J., Smyth, J. M., & Costigan, H. J. (2015). Real-time associations between engaging in leisure and daily health and well-being. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 49, 605–615.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health Science of Behavior Change Common Fund Program through an award administered by the National Institutes of Aging (UH2-AG052167). Additional information on this project, including ongoing updates on results and technical details, can be found at the project page hosted on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/njpbj/) as they become available. Support for the individual datasets was provided by the following sources. For ESCAPE, this work was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), the Leonard and Sylvia Marx Foundation, the Czap Foundation, and the National Institute on Aging (R01 AG039409, R01 AG042595, P01 AG03949, CTSA 1UL1TR001073). For SAWM, this work was supported by the National Institute on Aging (R01 AG026728). For SHADE, this work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL067990). For WDL, this work was supported by the Gallup Organization. For NTHS, this work was supported by the Basic Behavioral and Social Sciences Research Opportunity Network (OppNet) and by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL109340).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Matthew J. Zawadzki or Joshua M. Smyth.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Matthew J. Zawadzki, Stacey B. Scott, David M. Almeida, Stephanie T. Lanza, David E. Conroy, Martin J. Sliwinski, Jinhyuk Kim, David Marcusson-Clavertz, Robert S. Stawski, Paige M. Green, Christopher N. Sciamanna, Jillian A. Johnson and Joshua M. Smyth declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and animal rights and Informed consent

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zawadzki, M.J., Scott, S.B., Almeida, D.M. et al. Understanding stress reports in daily life: a coordinated analysis of factors associated with the frequency of reporting stress. J Behav Med 42, 545–560 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-018-00008-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-018-00008-x

Keywords

Navigation