An integrated model of skin cancer risk in sexual minority males
Sexual minority males are an at-risk group for developing skin cancer. Elevated rates of skin cancer among this population are thought to be driven by excess indoor tanning; however, motivations to indoor tan among this population are unknown. Theoretically, appearance-based and affect regulation motives may be proximal predictors of increased indoor tanning in this population. The current study tests an integrated biopsychosocial model of indoor tanning behaviors and future intentions among a sample of sexual minority males. Participants were 231 sexual minority males, between the age of 14 and 35 years, residing in San Diego County, California, who completed a battery of self-report questionnaires online. Constructs assessed included skin tone, perceived susceptibility to skin cancer, sociocultural pressures to tan, appearance-based motives to tan, affect regulation in regard to indoor tanning, indoor tanning behaviors over the previous 3 months, and future intentions to indoor tan. The three proposed proximal predictors of indoor tanning all displayed significant pathways; however, results varied depending upon the specific outcome measure modeled. Affect regulation was significantly associated with increased odds of indoor tanning, and future intentions to indoor tan. Increased appearance reasons to tan were significantly associated with future intentions to indoor tan, while increased appearance reasons not to tan were significantly associated with fewer number of indoor tanning sessions. Results underscore the unique pathways of affect regulation and appearance-based motives in indoor tanning behaviors. Skin cancer prevention programs focusing on sexual minority males may wish to address affect and appearance concerns.
KeywordsSkin cancer Indoor tanning Sexual minority Males Appearance Affect
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Aaron J. Blashill, Benjamin M. Rooney, and Kristen J. Wells declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Human and animal rights and Informed consent
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- American Cancer Society (2013). Cancer facts and figures. http://www.cancer.org/research/cancerfactsfigures/cancerfactsfigures/cancer-facts-figures-2013
- American Cancer Society (2016). Cancer Facts and Figures. http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@research/documents/document/acspc-047079.pdf
- Cafri, G., Thompson, J. K., Roehrig, M., van den Berg, P., Jacobsen, P. B., & Stark, S. (2006). An investigation of appearance motives for tanning: The development and evaluation of the Physical Appearance Reasons For Tanning Scale (PARTS) and its relation to sunbathing and indoor tanning intentions. Body Image, 3, 199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2006.05.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Janz, N. K., Champion, V. L., & Strecher, V. J. (2008). The health belief model. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & F. M. Lewis (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research and practice (3rd ed., pp. 45–66). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Magin, P., Pond, D., Smith, W., Goode, S., & Paterson, N. (2012). Reliability of skin-type self-assessment: Agreement of adolescents’ repeated Fitzpatrick skin phototype classification ratings during a cohort study. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 26, 1396–1399. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04298.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mustanski, B., Van Wagenen, A., Birkett, M., Eyster, S., & Corliss, H. L. (2014). Identifying sexual orientation health disparities in adolescents: Analysis of pooled data from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, 2005 and 2007. American Journal of Public Health, 104, 211–217. doi: 10.2105/APJH.2013.301748 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2001). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables [computer software]. Los Angeles: Author.Google Scholar
- O’Riordan, D. L., Field, A. E., Geller, A. C., Brooks, D. R., Aweh, G., Colditz, G. A., et al. (2006). Frequent tanning bed use, weight concerns, and other health risk behaviors in adolescent females (United States). Cancer Causes and Control, 17, 679–686. doi: 10.1007/s10552-005-0453-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Riggle, E. D., Rostosky, S. S., Black, W. W., & Rosenkrantz, D. E. (2017). Outness, concealment, and authenticity: Associations with LGB individuals’ psychological distress and well-being. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 4, 54–62. doi: 10.1037/sgd0000202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ródenas, J. M., Delgado-Rodríguez, M., Herranz, M. T., Tercedor, J., & Serrano, S. (1996). Sun exposure, pigmentary traits, and risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma: A case-control study in a Mediterranean population. Cancer Causes and Control, 7, 275–283. doi: 10.1007/BF00051303 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stapleton, J. L., Manne, S. L., Darabos, K., Greene, K., Ray, A. E., Turner, A. L., et al. (2015). Randomized controlled trial of a web-based indoor tanning intervention: Acceptability and preliminary outcomes. Health Psychology, 34, 1278–1285. doi: 10.1037/hea0000254 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2014). The surgeon general’s call to action to prevent skin cancer. http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/calls/prevent-skin-cancer
- Williams, A. L., Grogan, S., Clark-Carter, D., & Buckley, E. (2013). Appearance-based interventions to reduce ultraviolet exposure and/or increase sun protection intentions and behaviours: A systematic review and meta-analyses. British Journal of Health Psychology, 18, 182–217. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8287.2012.02089.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar